Parenting ‘gifted and talented’ children in urban areas

Abstract

International evidence demonstrates the importance of engaging parents in the education of their ‘high-potential’ children, yet limited research has focused on the involvement of parents from differing economic strata/backgrounds. The current study explored the dilemmas of parenting academically high-ability children from economically deprived urban areas in the UK. Data were gathered from a sample of parents whose children attended a university-based sustained intervention programme for designated ‘gifted’ pupils aged 12–16. Parental perceptions were sought in relation to (a) the usefulness/impact of the intervention programme, (b) parents’ aspirations for their children growing up in economically deprived urban areas and (c) parents’ views on the support provided by the extended family, peer groups and the wider community. The findings have significant implications for both policy and practice and, more specifically, for engaging parents in intervention programmes offered by universities and schools to children in order to increase their access to higher education and for enhancing their life chances.

Keywords

Parental perspectives urban economically deprived ‘gifted and talented’United Kingdom

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

(2011) Early intervention: The next steps. An independent report to HM Government. London: Cabinet Office

Blunkett

(2000) Higher education in the 21st century. Speech by the Secretary of State for Education, 15 February, University of Greenwich, UK.

Cabinet Office (2009) Unleashing aspiration: The final report of the panel on fair access to the professions. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/media/227102/fair-access.pdf. (accessed 21 January 2014).

Callahan

(2007) What can we learn from research about promising practice in developing the gifts and talents of low-income students. In: Van Tassel-Baska

Stambaugh

(eds) Overlooked Gems: A National Perspective on Low-income Promising Learners. Washington DC: The National Association for Gifted Children and the Centre for Gifted Education, College of William and Mary USA, pp.53–58.

Campbell

Verma

(2007) Effective parental influence: Academic home climate linked to children’s achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation 13 (6): 501–519.

Casey

Koshy

(2002) Submerged talent and world class recognition. In: Richardson

(ed.) Assessing ‘Gifted and Talented’ Children. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, pp.87–101.

Casey

Koshy

Portman Smith

(2011). Opportunities and challenges of working with ‘gifted and talented’ students in an urban context: A university-based intervention program. The Gifted Child Today 34 (1): 35–43.

DCSF (Department for Children, Schools and Families) (2008) The Impact of Parental Involvement on Children’s Education. Nottingham: Department for Children, Schools and Families.

DCSF (Department for Children, Schools and Families) (2009) Your Child, Your Schools, Our Future: Building a 21st Century School System. Nottingham: Department for Children, Schools and Families.

10.

DfEE (Department for Education and Employment) (1997) Excellence in Schools. London: The Stationery Office.

11.

DfEE (Department for Education and Employment) (1999) Excellence in Cities. The National Evaluation of a Policy to Raise Standards in Urban Schools 2000-2003. London: The Stationery Office.

12.

Desforges

Abouchaar

(2003) The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievement and adjustment: A literature review. London: Department for Education and Skills Research Report 433.

13.

Goodall

Vorhaus

(2011) Review of best practice in parental engagement: Comprehensive literature review on best practice in engagement of parents. Research Report 156 Commissioned by the UK Government. London: Department for Education.

14.

Gorard

(2011) Measuring segregation: beware of the cautionary tale by Johnston and Jones. Environment and Planning 43 (1): 3–7.

15.

Her Majesty’s Inspectorate (1979) Aspects of Secondary Education in England. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.

16.

Her Majesty’s Inspectorate (1992) Education Observed: The Education of Very Able Pupils in Maintained Schools. London: Her Majesty’s Stationary Office.

17.

Koshy

Pinheiro-Torres

Portman- Smith

(2012). The landscape of ‘gifted and talented’ education in England and Wales: How are teachers implementing policy? Research Papers in Education 27 (2): 167–186.

18.

Lampl

(2012) Foreword: Educating the highly able. In: Smithers

Robinson

(eds) Educating the Highly Able. Report Commissioned by the Sutton Trust UK . London: The Sutton Trust.

19.

Moroawska

Sanders

(2009) Parenting ‘gifted and talented’ children: Conceptual and empirical foundations. Gifted Child Quarterly 53 (3): 163–173.

20.

Robinson

Shore

Enersen

(2007) Promising Learners from Low Income Backgrounds. Best Practices in Gifted Education. An Evidence-based Guide. TX: Prufrock Press.

21.

St Clair

Benjamin

(2011) Performing desires: The dilemma of aspirations and educational attainment. British Educational Research Journal 37 (3): 501–517.

22.

Vygotsky

(1978) Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

23.

Westmoreland

Rosenberg

Lopez

. (2009) Seeing is believing: Promising practices for how school districts promote family engagement (Issue Brief). Washington DC: National PTA and Cambridge MA: Harvard Family Research Project.