Creating Effective Citizens: Unique Opportunities for Gifted Education Through the Social Studies

Abstract

Social studies is dedicated to creating the next generation of effective citizens. To this aim, social studies educators embrace curricular goals that include civic competence, higher-order thinking, discipline integration, real-world applications, leadership skills, cooperative learning, research skills, content knowledge, and an understanding of the changing world. An ideal way to meet these curricular goals is through the implementation of service learning within the social studies curriculum. Service learning is particularly appropriate for the gifted student, as it meets both the students' cognitive and affective needs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Carnegie Corporation & CIRCLE. (2003). The civic mission of schools. Retrieved March 1, 2008, from HYPERLINK “http://www.civicmissionofschools.org/site/campaign/cms_report.html” http://www.civicmissionofschools.org/site/campaign/cms_report.html .

Clark

(1992). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school (4th ed.). New York: Merrill.

Delisle

J.R.

(1991). Gifted students and social studies. In Shaver

J. P.

(Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 175–182). New York: National Council for the Social Studies.

Duplass

J. A.

(2006). Middle and high school teaching: Methods, standards, & best practices. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Duplass

J. A.

(2008). Teaching elementary social studies: Strategies, standards, and Internet resources. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Fountain

(2003). Service learning: A promising practice. Basic Education, 47(4), 15–20.

Hahn

C. L.

(2001). Democratic understanding: Cross-national perspectives. Theory Into Practice, 40(1), 14–22.

Hartsell

(2006). Teaching toward compassion: Environmental values education for secondary students. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(4), 265–271.

Hirsch

E. D.

(2008). Plugging the hole in state standards. American Educator, 12(7), 8–12.

10.

Johnson

(2001). Integrating an affective component in the curriculum for the gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Today, 24(4), 14–18.

11.

Kaplan

S. N.

(2002). Awakening and elaborating differentiation in social studies content and instruction. Gifted Child Today, 25(3), 18–23.

12.

Lewis

B. A.

(1996). Serving others hooks student on learning. Educational Leadership, 53(5), 70–74.

13.

Morris

R. V.

(1997). The gifted and talented profit from the social studies. Southern Social Studies Journal, 23(1), 19–29.

14.

National Commission on Service-Learning. (2002). Learning in deed. Retrieved March 10, from HYPERLINK “http://www.learningindeed.org/slcommission/learningindeed.pdf” http://www.learningindeed.org/slcommission/learningindeed.pdf .

15.

National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Expectations of excellence: Curriculum standards for the social studies, Bulletin 89. Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies.

16.

National Council for the Social Studies. (2000). Service-learning: An essential component of citizenship education. Retrieved April 11, 2008, HYPERLINK “http://www.socialstudies.org/positions/servicelearning/” http://www.socialstudies.org/positions/servicelearning/ .

17.

National Council for the Social Studies. (2001). Creating effective citizens. Retrieved March 12, 2008, from HYPERLINK “http://www.socialstudies.org/positions/effectivecitizens/” http://www.socialstudies.org/positions/effectivecitizens/ .

18.

National Council for the Social Studies. (2007). National assessment of educational progress- 2006 history and civics results. Retrieved April 14, 2008, from HYPERLINK “http://www.ncss.org/issues/naep2006” http://www.ncss.org/issues/naep2006 .

19.

Pfeiffer

S. I.

(2003). Challenges and opportunities for students who are gifted: What the experts say. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 161–169.

20.

Reis

S. M.

Renzulli

J. S.

(1985). The secondary triad model: A practical plan for implementing gifted programs at the junior and senior high school level. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, Inc.

21.

Reising

(2005). Service learning: Service through oral history projects. The Clearing House, 79(2), 69–70.

22.

Renzulli

J. S.

(1977) The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, Inc.

23.

Robinson

N. M.

Reis

S. M.

Neihart

Moon

S. M.

(2002). Social and emotional issues facing gifted and talented students: What have we learned and what should we don now? In Neihart

Reis

S. M.

Robinson

N. M.

Moon

S. M.

(Eds.), The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know? (p. 267–288). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press, Inc.

24.

Silverman

L. K.

(1994). The moral sensitivity of gifted children and the evolution of society. Roeper Review, 17(2), 110–116.

25.

Terry

A. W.

(2003). Effects of service learning on young, gifted adolescents and their community. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(4), 295–308.

26.

Terry

A. W.

Bohnenberger

J. E.

(2004). Blueprint for incorporating service learning: A basic, developmental, K-12 service learning typology. Journal of Experiential Education, 27(1), 15–31.

27.

Tomlinson

C.A.

(1992). Gifted learners: The boomerang kids of middle school? Roeper Review, 16(3), 177–182.

28.

Van Tassel-Baska

(1986). Effective curriculum and instructional models for talented students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 30(4), 164–169.

29.

VantLeven

(2008). Service learning, boys, and fish tanks. Middle Ground, 11(4), 27–28.

30.

Wade

(2000). Beyond charity: Service learning for social justice. Social Education, 12(4), 6–9

31.

Wade

(2001). Social action in the social studies: From the ideal to the real. Theory into Practice, 40(1), 23–28.

32.

Winebrenner

(2001) Teaching gifted kids in the regular classroom (Rev. ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Free Spirit Publishing Inc.