This article reports on the key findings of a recent study undertaken by Aya Shibata, exploring teachers' and counsellors' perceptions of gifted children and of gifted education policy in New Zealand and Japan. The study took the form of qualitative, comparative case studies, and involved semi-structured interviews with teachers and school counsellors in New Zealand and Japan. Key findings highlight a lack of official support for gifted education in Japan, while acknowledging the place of out-of-school, private programmes as a form of gifted education. The study offers insight into Japanese cultural concepts relevant to gifted and talented education, and suggests directions for future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bevan-BrownJ. (1999). Special abilities: A Maori perspective. Implications of catering for gifted students from minority cultures. Gifted Education International, 14(1), 86–96,
2.
Bevan-BrownJ. (2005). Providing a culturally responsive environment for gifted Maori learners. International Education Journal, 6(2), 150–155.
3.
BraggettE.MoltzenR. (2000). Programs and practices for identifying and nurturing giftedness and talent in Australia and New Zealand. In HellerK.MonksF.SubotnikR.SternbergR. (Eds). International handbook of giftedness and talent. (2nd ed). (pp.779–797). New York: Elsevier Science.
4.
CooperE. (1999). A reflection: The Japanese approach to gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Today, 22(2), 18–21.
5.
FettermanD.M. (1988). Excellence and equality. New York: State University of New York.
6.
JenkinsH. (2002). Culturally relevant pedagogy: Embracing Maori giftedness. Unpublished Masters thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
7.
MacleodR. (2004). Educational provision: Secondary schools. In McAlpineD.MoltzenR. (Eds). Gifted and talented: New Zealand perspectives. (2nd ed). (pp. 239–262). Palmerston North: Kanuka Grove Press.
8.
McAlpineD. (2004). What do we mean by gifted and talented? Concepts and definitions. In McAlpineD.MoltzenR. (Eds). Gifted and talented: New Zealand perspectives, (2nd ed). (pp. 33–65). Palmerston North: Kanuka Grove Press.
9.
MoltzenR. (2004). Historical perspective. In McAlpineD.MoltzenR. (Eds). Gifted and talented: New Zealand perspectives. (2nd ed), (pp. 1–32). Palmerston North: Kanuka Grove Press.
10.
ShibataA. (2006). Teachers'and counsellors'perspectives on gifted children and gifted education: New Zealand and Japan. Unpublished Masters Dissertation, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
11.
StevensonWH. (1998). Cultural interpretations of giftedness: The case of East Asia. In FriedmanR.C.RogersK.B. (Eds). Talent in context: Historical and social perspectives on giftedness. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
12.
TownsendM. (2004). Acceleration and enrichment: A union rather than a choice. In McAlpineD.MoltzenR. (Eds). Gifted and talented: New Zealand perspectives. (2nd ed). (pp. 289–308). Palmerston North: Kanuka Grove Press.
13.
WuT.W.ChoS.MunandarU. (2000). Programs and practices for identifying and nurturing giftedness and talent in Asia (outside the Mainland of China), In HellerK.MonksF.SubotnikR.SternbergR. (Eds). International handbook of giftedness and talent. (2nd ed). (pp. 765–777). New York: Elsevier Science.
