Who is the Best Teacher? Do Different Kinds of Students Have Different Preference?

Abstract

As students have the closest relationship with teachers and are observers of teacher's methods and strategies on a daily basis, it is important to understand and value their views (Beishuizen et al., 2001). Yet, relatively few studies have surveyed the views of students regarding their perceptions of essential teacher attributes (Pang, 2000).

In a study conducted in Australia (Vialle, 2002), investigating the qualities of effective teachers from the perspective of gifted students, it was found that the personal / social qualities of the teachers were more highly valued than their intellectual qualities.

Similar results were found in studies conducted in the U.S.A (Abel & Karnes, 1994; Dorhout, 1983; Krumboltz & Farquhr, 1957; Lewis, 1982), while the Israeli study (Milgram, 1979) came to contrasting findings. In her study, Milgram added the dimension of teacher creativity. The subjects in that study demonstrated a strong preference for the intellectual qualities of the teacher above the other two dimensions. Yet, it is important to note, that while using the same instruments as Milgram did, Maddux (Maddux et al, 1985) found a preference of the personal I social characteristics of the teachers over the intellectual and creativity ones.

In a previous study (1998), Vialle used semi-structured interviews and found that gifted children, aged 5–6 years, regarded personal qualities as highly as academic ones. Understanding and helpfulness were rated as the key qualities in their ideal teacher. A sense of humor, creativity, and curiosity were highly valued as well as the ability to make the work interesting and structured.

The basic goal of the present study (conducted in Israel) is similar to that of Vialle's, yet it consists of a few independent variables: giftedness; religion; the quality of extraversion / introversion of the students (which was meant to explain the preference of the social qualities). As in the former studies, the gender and socioeconomic status were taken into account.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abel

Karnes

F.A.

(1994). Teacher preferences among the lower socioeconomic rural and suburban advantaged gifted students. Rœper Review, 17, n. 1 p. 52–57.

Alterniatt

E. R.

Pomerantz

E.M.

(2003). The development of competence-related and motivational beliefs: An investigation of similarity and influence among friends. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, n. 1, p. 111–123.

Assor

, (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours predicting students' engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72 p. 261–278.

Amko

(2002). Relationship between children's social competence, learning motivation and school achievement. Educational Psychology, 22, p. 317–330.

Beishuizen

J. J.

, (2001). Students' and teachers' cognition about good teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, p. 185–201.

Brown

Holtzman

(1953). Survey of study habits and attitudes. New York: Psychological Corporation.

Busato

V.V.

, (1999). The relation between learning styles, the Big Five Personality Traits and achievement motivation in higher education. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, n. 1, p. 129–140.

Costa

P. T.

McCrae

R.R.

(2000) In Molfese

V.J.

Molfese

(Eds.), Temperament and Personality Development across the Life Span (p. 235–252, Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum

Dorhout

, (1983). Student and teacher perceptions of preferred teacher behaviors among the academically gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 27, n. 3, p. 122–125.

10.

Eccles

(1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviours. In Spence

J. T.

(Ed.) Achievement and Achievement Motives: Psychological and Sociological Approaches (p. 75–146). New York: Freeman.

11.

Eysenck

H.J.

(1976) Personality Questionnaire.

12.

Feldman

K.A.

(1986). The perceived Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as related to their personality and attitudinal characteristics. Research in Higher Education, 24, P. 139–175.

13.

Fisher

, , (1998). Relationship between teacher-student interpersonal behaviour and teacher personality. School Psychology International, 19, p. 99–119.

14.

Flaitz

(1987), Non-academic Indicators of Teacher Effectiveness: A Review of the Literature, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Mobile, AL (November) (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 289 848).

15.

Francis

L. F.

Montgomery

S. A.

(1993). Personality and school-related attitudes among 11 to 16 year old girls. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, n. 5, p. 647–654.

16.

Gage

N.L.

Leavitt

G.S.

Stone

G.C.

(1955). Teachers' understanding of their pupils and pupils' ratings of their teachers. Psychological Monographs, 69, n. 21, p.17–19.

17.

Gronlick

W. S.

, (1991). Inner resources for school achievement motivational mediators of children's perceptions of their parents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, n. 4, p. 508–517.

18.

Hebrew Encyclopaedia 2 P. 940-1 Introversion/ Extroversion.

19.

Husén

Postlethnaite

T.N.

(eds.) (1994), The International Encyclopedia of Education: Elsevier Science Ltd. p. 28–32.

20.

Jung

C.G.

(1971). Psychological Types, ( Hull

R.F.C.

, Revision of Trans. By H.G. Baynes). Princeton, N.J.: Princeton Univ. Press (original work published 1921).

21.

Kaniel

, (1975). Introversion/Extroversion, Vigilance task, and number of non-signals. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement of Master degree in the School of Education, Bar — Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.

22.

Krumboltz

Farquhar

(1957). The Effect of three teaching methods on achievement and motivational outcomes in a how-to-study course. Psychological Monographs, 71 n. 14, p. 1–26.

23.

Levy

, Perceptions of interpersonal teacher behaviour, In Wubbles

Levy

(Eds.) Do You Know What You Look Like? Interpersonal Relationships in Education, p. 29–45, London: Falmer Press.

24.

Lewis

J.F.

(1982 May/June). Bulldozers or chairs? gifted students describe their ideal teacher. The Gifted Child Today, p.16–19.

25.

McCrae

, (2002). Personality trait development from age 12 to age 18: Longitudinal cross sectional and cross cultural analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, n.6, p. 1456–1468.

26.

Maddux

C.D.

, , (1985). Preferences of gifted students for selected teacher characteristics. Gifted Child Quarterly, 29, n. 4, p.160–163.

27.

Marchant

G.J.

, (1995). The Road to School Success: Students' Perceptions of Parenting, Teaching, and School. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

28.

Milgram

R. M.

(1971). Perception of teacher behaviour in gifted and Non-gifted Children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, n. 1 p. 125–128.

29.

Moos

(1978). A typology of junior high and high school classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 15, p. 53–66.

30.

Nolen

S. B.

Nicholas

J. G.

(1993). Elementary school pupils' beliefs about practices for motivating pupils in mathematics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, p. 414–430.

31.

Oakland

, (2000). Temperament-based learning styles of identified gifted and non gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, n. 3, p. 183–189.

32.

Pang

M.F.

(2000). Supporting gifted students in Hong Kong secondary schools: School policies and student' perspectives. Gifted Education International, 15, p. 80–96.

33.

Paulson

, (1998). Patterns of parenting and teaching. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18, n. 1 p.5–26.

34.

Ross

, (2003). Competition and cooperation in the Five Factor Model: Individual differences in achievement orientation. The Journal of Psychology, 37, n. 4, p. 323–337.

35.

Ryan

R.M.

Grolnick

W.S.

(1986). Origins and pawns in the classroom: self reports and projective assessments of individual differences in children's perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, p. 550–558.

36.

Ryan

R.M.

, (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, p. 226–249.

37.

Schunk

D. H.

Meece

J.L.

(Eds.) (1992). Student Perception in the Classroom. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

38.

Trapanier-Street

(2005). Teachers-Mentors of children. Childhood Education, 8, n. 2, p. 66–76.

39.

Tsui

Y.K.C.

(1993). Gifted students: Their life problems and perceptions of class environment. In Winter

(Ed.), Special Students in Mainstream Schools (p. 97–115. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Education.

40.

Vialle

, (1998). Unpublished raw data.

41.

Vialle

Quigley

(2002). Does the teacher of the gifted need to be gifted? Gifted and Talented International, 17, p. 85–90.

42.

Yuen

Westwood

(2004). Expected competencies of teachers of gifted learners: Perspectives from Chinese teachers and students. Gifted and Talented International, 19, n. 1, p. 7–14.