Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study asked the question “Why am I doing a research project for Expo 2005?” The sample of respondents comprised 155 aspirant young scientists and technologists who exhibited their projects in the 2005 Cape Town Science Talent Quest (Expo) competition for schools. They commenced their participation in the Expo judging session by responding to eleven literature-derived reasons or motivations for commencing research investigations. These items were presented in a hikert-scale format, and included a novel source of motivation framed uniquely in the local South African context. Subsequently, open-ended questions and interviews were conducted in more depth with selected students who offered amplified responses and explanations. It was found that the Expo students gave higher ratings to reasons that were intrinsic (such as personal interest, skills development, personal challenge and ambition) than to reasons that were externally controlled (such as emulating somebody else's example, or meeting other people's expectations). The students' self-reported levels of enjoyment of their research projects correlated highest with the strength of their commitment to enhancing social emancipation in South Africa through their chosen research projects.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alderson

(2000). Children as researchers. In Christensen

James

(Eds.), Research with children: perspectives and practice, pp. 241–257. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Bickman

Rog

D.A.

(Eds.) (1997). Handbook of applied social research methods. Sage Publications.

Brown

McDowell

Race

(1995). 500 tips for research students, pp. 8–9. London: Kogan Page.

Christensen

Prout

(2002). Working with ethical symmetry in social research with children. Childhood, 9 (4), 477–497.

Colangelo

Assouline

S.G.

Kerr

Huesman

Johnson

(1993). Mechanical inventiveness: a three-phase study. In: Bock

G.R.

Ackrill

(Eds.), The origins and development of high ability, pp. 162–163. Ciba Foundation Symposium. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.

Department of Education, Pretoria (2002). Revised National Curriculum Statement Grades R-9 (Schools) Policy: Natural Sciences, Gazette No. 23406, Vol. 443.

Diezmann

C. M.

(2003). Australian Science Teachers Journal, 49 (3), 46.

Fort

D.C.

(1990). Science and math events: connecting and competing. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers' Association.

Fraser

(2004). Some educational implications for spiritual giftedness. Gifted Education International, 18, 258.

10.

Gliner

J.A.

Morgan

G.A.

(2000). Research methods in applied settings: an integrated approach to design and analysis, p.60. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

11.

Greenfield

T.A.

(1995). An exploration of gender participation patterns in science competitions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32 (7), 735–748.

12.

Kellett

(2005). How to develop children as researchers: a step-by-step guide to teaching the research process. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

13.

Lawrence

(1988). Enhancing self esteem in the classroom. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

14.

Mayall

(2000). Conversations with children: working with generational. In Christensen

James

(Eds.), Research with children: perspectives and practices, pp. 120–135. London: Routledge Falmer.

15.

McDermott

K.J.

Machotka

(2006). Reflections on final year project work in engineering programmes. In Pudlowski

Z.J.

(Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th UICEE Annual Conference on Engineering Education, Muscat, Oman, 11–15 February, pp.175–179. Monash University: UNESCO International Centre for Engineering Education.

16.

Rahn

(1986). Jugend forscht. Göttingen: Hogrefe.

17.

Rasool

(2005). SA needs a highly skilled workforce to grow economy. Cape Times Business Report, 23 November, 2.

18.

Rochford

(1998). “Challenged, ambitious, fascinated and inspired”. A characteristic profile of elite, award-winning S-E-T students in the Exposcience Internationale. In Pudlowski

Z.J.

(Ed.), Proceedings of the Global Congress on Engineering Education, Cracow, Poland, 6–11 September, pp. 342–345. Monash University: UNESCO International Centre for Engineering Education.

19.

Siegler

R.S.

Kotovsky

(1986). Two levels of giftedness: shall ever the twain meet? In Sternberg

R.J.

Davidson

J.E.

(Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 417–435). New York: Cambridge University Press. Quoted in P. Brandwein and A.H. Passow (Eds.) 1988, Gifted young in science: potential through performance, p.88. Washington: National Science Teachers Association.

20.

Subotnik

R.F.

Steiner

C.L.

(1993). Adult manifestations of adolescent talent in science. Roeper Review, 15, 164–169.

21.

Subotnik

R. F.

Duschl

R. A.

Selmon

E. H.

(1993). Retention and attrition of science talent: a longitudinal study of Westinghouse Science Talent Search winners. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 61–72.

22.

Tytler

Swatton

(1992). A critique of Attainment Target 1 based on case studies of students' investigations. School Science Review, 74 (266), 21–35.

23.

Wallace

(2004a). Editorial, Gifted Education International, 18, 240.

24.

Wallace

(2004b). Editorial policy, Fronticepiece, Gifted Education International, 18, 236.

Responses of South African Science Talent Quest Students to the Question “Why Am I Doing a Research Project for Expo 2005?”

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References