Teacher Nomination: German Version of the Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students

Abstract

Teacher nomination is often used as one criterion of a multidimensional approach towards identifying students with high abilities. Multiple criteria can be useful to identify students for gifted programs who may be overlooked using traditional methods. The teacher rating scales discussed in this study have been extensively used in the United States and have been translated into twelve other languages for use in identification of talented students in other countries. The purpose of this study was to develop teacher-rating scales for schools in the German speaking part of Switzerland. Therefore, the Scales for Rating the Behavioral Characteristics of Superior Students revised (SRBCSS-R) were translated from English into German and data were collected from certified teachers in public schools in Switzerland. Factor analysis confirmed the original four-factor structure from the American SRBCSS-R with a comparative fit index (CFI) of .89 and a root mean square residual of .07. Alpha reliability coefficients ranged between a = .86 and a = .96, providing support for the internal consistency of the instrument. Use of these scales is recommended as one criterion for identifying students with high abilities in Swiss schools and the evaluation of its appropriateness for other German speaking schools is encouraged. As more schools implement the Schoolwide Enrichment Model, the use of the SRBCSS-R will become more widespread.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dahme

Eggers

(1988). Lehrerkriterien zur Identifikation hochbegabter Schüler: Freie Beschreibung vs. vorgegebene Beurteilungsskalen. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 35, 88–201.

Davis

G.A.

Rimm

S.B.

(1997). Education of the gifted and talented (4th Ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Gagné

(1990). Toward a differentiated model of giftedness and talent. In Colangelo

Davis

(Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 65–81). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Gardner

(1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.

Gardner

(1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Books.

Bentler

P. M.

(1995). Evaluating model fit. In Hoyle

R. H.

(Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

Perleth

Ch.

Sierwald

Heller

K.A.

(1993). Selected results of the Munich longitudinal study of giftedness: The Multidimensional/Typological giftedness model. Roeper Review, 15, 149–155.

Reis

S.M.

(1981). An analysis of the productivity of gifted students participating in programs using the Revolving Door Identification Model. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Storrs, CT, University of Connecticut.

10.

Renzulli

J. S.

(1978). What makes giftedness? Phi Delta Kappan, 60 (3), 180–184, 261.

11.

Renzulli

J.S.

(1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In Sternberg

R.J.

Davidson

J.E.

(Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53–92). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

12.

Renzulli

J.S.

Reis

S. M.

(1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence (2nd ed.). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

13.

Renzulli

J. S.

Reis

S. M.

Smith

L H.

(1981). The revolving door identification model Masfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.

14.

Renzulli

J. S.

Reis

S. M.

Stedtnitz

(2001a). Das Schulische Enrichment Modell SEM: Begabungsförderung ohne Elitebildung. Aarau, Schweiz: Sauerländer Verlag.

15.

Renzulli

J. S.

Reis

S. M.

Stedtnitz

(2001b). Begleitband zum Schulischen Enrichment Modell SEM: Trainingsaktivitäten, Vorlagen, Unterrichtsmaterialien. Aarau, Schweiz: Sauerländer Verlag.

16.

Renzulli

J. S.

Smith

L. H.

White

A.J.

Callahan

C. M.

Hartman

R. K.

Westberg

K. L.

(2002). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students: Technical and administration manual (revised edition). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, Inc.

17.

Saccuzzo

D.P.

, (1994). Use of the Raven Progressive Matrices test in an ethnically diverse gifted population. In Saccuzzo

D.P.

et al., Identifying underrepresented disadvantaged gifted and talented children: A multifaceted approach. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 368 096)

18.

Stamm

(2000). Die Langzeitwirkung von Frühlesen und Frührechnen: Ein besonderer Blick auf das Phänomen Hochbegabung. Unveröffentlichter Artikel.

19.

Sternberg

R. J.

(1986). A triarchic theory of intellectual giftedness. In Sternberg

R.J.

Davidson

J.E.

(Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 223–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

20.

Sternberg

R. J.

(1996). Successful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligence determine success in life. New York: Simon & Schuster.