HendriksenC.F.M. (1998). A call for a European prohibition of monoclonal antibody production by the ascites procedure in laboratory animals. ATLA26, 523–540.
5.
MarxU., EmbletonM.J., FischerR., GruberF.P., HanssonU., HeuerJ., de LeeuwW.A., LogtenbergT., MerzW., PortetelleD., RometteJ-L., & StraughanD.W. (1997). Monoclonal antibody production. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 23. ATLA25, 121–137.
6.
MasseyE., AufderheideM., KochW., LoddingH., PohlmannG., WindtH., JarckP., & KnebelJ.W. (1998). Micronucleus induction in V79 cells after direct exposure to whole cigarette smoke. Mutagenesis13, 145–149.
7.
JenningsM. ed. (1998). Lay Members and the Ethical Review Process.Horsham, West Sussex, UK: RSPCA.
BoisvertD.P.J. (1997). Editorial policies and animal welfare. In Animal Alternatives, Welfare and Ethics (ed. van ZutphenL.F.M., & BallsM.), pp. 399–404. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
10.
MephamT.B., CombesR.D., BallsM., BarbieriO., BlokhuisH.J., CostaP., CrillyR.E., de Cock BuningT., DelpireV.C., O'HareM., HoudebineL-M., van KreijlC.F., van der MeerM., ReinhardtC.A., WolfE., & van ZellerA-M. (1998). Use of transgenic animals in the European Union. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 28. ATLA26, 21–43.
11.
FestingM.F.W., BaumansV., CombesR.D., HalderM., HendriksenC.F.M., HowardB.R., LovellD., MooreG.J., OverendP., & WilsonM.S. (1998). Reducing the use of laboratory animals in biomedical research: problems and possible solutions. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 29. ATLA26, 283–301.
12.
JohnstonN.E., & RuscheB. (1997). Ethics committees: how do they contribute to the Three Rs? Synopsis of the workshop. In Animal Alternatives, Welfare and Ethics (ed. van ZutphenL.F.M., & BallsM.), pp. 391–395. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
13.
JenningsM. (1994). Ethics Committees for Laboratory Animals: A Basis for Their Composition and Function.Horsham, West Sussex, UK: RSPCA.
14.
SmithJ.A., & BoydK.M. (1991). The assessment and “weighing” of costs and benefits. In Lives in the Balance: The Ethics of Using Animals in Biomedical Research, pp. 138–147. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
15.
TheuneE.P., & de Cock BuningT. (1993). Assessing interests. An operational approach. In Science and the Human–Animal Relationship (ed. HicksE.K.), pp. 143–160. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: SISWO
16.
BoisvertD.P., & PorterD.G. (1995). Ethical scoring systems. In Alternative Methods in Toxicology and the Life Sciences, Vol. 11, The World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences: Education, Research, Testing (ed. GoldbergA., & van ZutphenL.F.M.), pp. 637–641. New York, USA: Mary Ann Liebert.
17.
MatfieldM. (1995). The public debate about animal experimentation. ATLA23, 312–316.
18.
MortonD.B. (1995). Advances in refinement in animal experimentation over the past 25 years. ATLA23, 812–822.
19.
PooleT. (1996). Happy animals make good science. Laboratory Animals31, 116–124.
20.
WemelsfelderF. (1995). Animal boredom: consequences for housing and feeding conditions. In Alternative Methods in Toxicology and the Life Sciences, Vol. 11, The World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences: Education, Research, Testing (ed. GoldbergA., & van ZutphenL.F.M.), pp. 607–612. New York, USA: Mary-Ann Liebert.
21.
HurstJ.L., BarnardC.J., HareR., WheeldonE.B., & WestC.D. (1996). Housing and welfare in laboratory rats: time-budgeting and pathophysiology in single-sex groups. Animal Behaviour52, 335–360.
22.
Patterson-KaneE.G., HuntM., & HarperD. (1999). Behavioural indices of laboratory rat welfare. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare, in press.
23.
JenningsM., MooreG., & HowardB. (1998). The Ethical Review Process in Academia. A Laboratory Animal Science Association Roundtable Discussion to Assist in Setting Up An Effective System.Tamworth, Staffordshire, UK: LASA.
24.
BallsM., GoldbergA.M., FentemJ.H., BroadheadC.L., BurchR.L., FestingM.F.W., FrazierJ.M., HendriksenC.F.M., JenningsM., van der KampM.D.O., MortonD.B., RowanA.N., RussellC., RussellW.M.S., SpielmannH., StephensM.L., StokesW.S., StraughanD.W., YagerJ.D., ZurloJ., & van ZutphenB.F.M. (1995). The Three Rs: the way forward. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 11. ATLA23, 838–866.