Comparative dermatology has paid little attention to the physiopathology of the stratum corneum. In this study, we investigated the responses of human and canine horny layers to marketed animal wash products by using the corneosurfametry bioassay. Previous work has shown that, with increasing surfactant aggressiveness to the stratum corneum, the colorimetric index of mildness (CIM) decreases, while both the corneosurfametry index (CSMI) and the overall difference in corneosurfametry (ODC) increase. In the present study, stratum corneum reactivity to wash products and inter-individual variability were significantly higher in humans than in dogs. For the three corneosurfametry variables, linear correlations were found between data gathered in the two panel groups. In conclusion, this pilot study suggests that mean stratum corneum reactivity to surfactants is stronger in humans than in dogs. Inter-individual variation, indicative of sensitive skin, also appears to be broader in humans. As a consequence, data gathered from dogs by using the corneosurfametry bioassay cannot be extrapolated to humans. Such variation between species could be important in the assessment of product safety and in supporting claims for mildness.
DraizeJ.H., WoodwardG., & CalveryH.O. (1944). Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics82, 377–389.
2.
WalkerA.P., BasketterD.A., BaverelM., DiembeckW., MatthiesW., MouginD., PayeM., RöthlisbergerR., & DupuisJ. (1996). Test guidelines for assessment of skin compatibility of cosmetic finished products in man. Food and Chemical Toxicology34, 651–660.
3.
PayeM., & PiérardG.E. (1999). Skin care/detergents (cleaning agents/shampoos). In Dermatopharmacology of Topical Preparations. A Product Development-oriented Approach (ed. GabardB., SuberC., TreffelP., & ElsnerP.). Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag, in press.
4.
CurrenR.D., SoutheeJ.A., SpielmannH., LiebschM., FentemJ.H., & BallsM. (1995). The role of prevalidation in the development, validation and acceptance of alternative methods. ATLA23, 211–217.
5.
BallsM., & FentemJ.H. (1997). Progress toward the validation of alternative tests. ATLA25, 33–43.
6.
HarvellJ.D., TsaiY.C., & MaibachH.I. (1994). An in vivo correlation with three in vitro assays to assess skin irritancy potential. Journal of Toxicology — Cutaneous Ocular Toxicology13, 171–183.
7.
ShinD.S., KimD.B., RyuS.R., LeeS.H., KimP.Y., KohJ.S., & ParkW.J. (1996). In vitro alternatives to skin irritation tests. Cosmetics and Toiletries111, 61–64.
8.
Hermanns-LêT., ArreseJ.E., GoffinV., & PiérardG.E. (1999). Podophyllotoxin-induced acantholysis and cytolysis in a skin equivalent model?European Journal of Morphology, 36, 183–187.
9.
EliasP.M. (1996). Stratum corneum architecture, metabolic activity and interactivity with subjacent cell layers. Experimental Dermatology5, 191–201.
10.
PiérardG.E., GoffinV., & Piérard-FranchimontC. (1994). Corneosurfametry: a predictive assessment of the interaction of personal care cleansing products with human stratum corneum. Dermatology189, 152–156.
11.
PiérardG.E., GoffinV., & Piérard-FranchimontC. (1994). Squamometry and corneosurfametry in rating interactions of cleansing products with stratum corneum. Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists45, 269–277.
12.
PiérardG.E., & Piérard-FranchimontC. (1996). Drugs and cosmetics evaluations with skin strippings. In Dermatologic Research Techniques (ed. MaibachH.), pp. 133–148. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.
13.
PiérardG.E., MassonP., RodriguesL., BerardescaE., LévêqueJ.L., LodenM., RogiersV., SauermannG., & SerupJ. (1996). EEMCO guidance to the assessment of dry skin (xerosis) and ichthyosis: evaluation by stratum corneum strippings. Skin Research and Technology2, 3–11.
14.
GoffinV., PayeM., & PiérardG.E. (1995). Comparison of in vitro predictive tests for irritation induced by anionic surfactants. Contact Dermatitis33, 38–41.
15.
PiérardG.E., GoffinV., Hermanns-LêT., ArreseJ.E., & Piérard-FranchimontC. (1995). Surfactant-induced dermatitis: a comparison of corneosurfametry with predictive testing on human and reconstructed skin. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology33, 462–469.
16.
GoffinV., LetaweC., & PiérardG.E. (1996). Temperature-dependent effect of skin-cleansing products on human stratum corneum. Journal of Toxicology — Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology15, 125–130.
17.
GoffinV., Piérard-FranchimontC., & PiérardG.E. (1996). Skin and stratum corneum reactivity to household cleaning products. Contact Dermatitis34, 81–85.
18.
GoffinV., & PiérardG.E. (1996). Corneosurfametry and the compromised atopic stratum corneum. Archives of Dermatological Research288, 489–491.
19.
GoffinV., Piérard-FranchimontC., & PiérardG.E. (1996). Antidandruff shampoos and the stratum corneum. Journal of Dermatological Treatment7, 223–225.
20.
GoffinV., PayeM., & PiérardG.E. (1996). Corneosurfametry as an in vitro predictive test for skin irritation potential: comparison to in vivo data. In Alternatives to Animal Testing (ed. LisanskyS.G., MacMillanR., & DupuisJ.), pp. 296–302. Newbury, Berkshire, UK: CPL Press.
21.
GoffinV., HenryF., Piérard-FranchimontC., & PiérardG.E. (1997). Topical retinol and stratum corneum response to an environmental threat. Skin Pharmacology10, 85–89.
22.
GoffinV., Piérard-FranchimontC., & PiérardG.E. (1997). Microwave corneosurfametry: a minute assessment of the mildness of surfactant-containing products. Skin Research and Technology3, 242–244.
23.
HenryF., GoffinV., MaibachH., & PiérardG.E. (1997). Regional differences in stratum corneum reactivity to surfactants: quantitative assessment using the corneosurfametry bioassay. Contact Dermatitis37, 271–275.
24.
GoffinV., Piérard-FranchimontC., & PiérardG.E. (1988). Shielded corneosurfametry and corneoxenometry: novel bioassays for the assessment of skin barrier products. Dermatology196, 434–437.
25.
SimonP., VeyratS., PiquemalP., MontastierC., GoffinV., & PiérardG.E. (1998). Surfactants and the skin: the revival of sugar esters. Cosmetics and Toiletries113, 69–72.
26.
GrunewaldA.M., GloorM., GehringW., & KleeszP. (1995). Damage to the skin by repetitive washing. Contact Dermatitis32, 225–232.
27.
DykesP. (1998). Surfactants and the skin. International Journal of Cosmetic Science20, 53–61.
28.
KeswickB.H., ErtelK.D., & VisscherM.O. (1992). Comparison of exaggerated and normal use techniques for assessing the mildness of personal cleansers. Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists43, 187–193.
29.
GoffinV., LetawerC., & PiérardG.E. (1997). Effect of organic solvents on normal human stratum corneum: evaluation by the corneoxenometry bioassay. Dermatology195, 321–324.
30.
GoffinV., PiérardG.E., HenryF., LetaweC., & MaibachH. (1997). Sodium hypochlorite, bleaching agents and the stratum corneum. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety37, 199–202.
31.
GoffinV., Piérard-FranchimontC., & PiérardG.E. (1999). Modulation of human stratum corneum properties by salicylic acid and all-trans-retinoic acid. Skin Pharmacology — Applied Skin Physiology, in press.
32.
DaviesR., HarperK.H., & KynochS.R. (1972). Inter-species variation in dermal reactivity. Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists23, 371–381.
