DeardenJ.C., BarrattM.D., BenigniR., BristolD.W., CombesR.D., CroninM.T.D., JudsonP.N., PayneM.P., RichardA.M., TichyM., WorthA.P., & YourickJ.J. (1997). The development and validation of expert systems for predicting toxicity. The report and recommendations of an ECVAM/ECB workshop (ECVAM workshop 24).ATLA25, 223–252.
2.
BallsM., BlaauboerB., BrusickD., FrazierJ., LambD., PembertonM., ReinhardtC., RoberfroidM., RosenkranzH., SchmidB., SpielmannH., StammatiA-L., & WalumE. (1990). Report and recommendations of the CAAT/ERGATT workshop on the validation of toxicity test procedures.ATLA18, 313–337.
3.
FentemJ.H., & BallsM. (1997). The ECVAM approach to validation. In Developments in Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Vol. 27, Animal Alternatives, Welfare and Ethics (ed. van ZutphenL.F.M., & BallsM.), pp. 1083–1089. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
4.
BallsM., BothamP., CordierA., FumeroS., KayserD., KoëterH., KoundakjianP., LindquistN.G., MeyerO., PiodaL., ReinhardtC., RozemondH., SmyrniotisT., SpielmannH., Van LooyH., van der VenneM.T., & WalumE. (1990). Report and recommendations of an international workshop on promotion of the regulatory acceptance of validated non-animal toxicity test procedures.ATLA18, 339–344.
5.
BallsM., BlaauboerB.J., FentemJ.H., BrunerL., CombesR.D., EkwallB., FielderR.J., GuillouzoA., LewisR.W., LovellD.P., ReinhardtC.A., RepettoG., SladowskiD., SpielmannH., & ZuccoF. (1995). Practical aspects of the validation of toxicity test procedures. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 5.ATLA23, 129–147.
6.
BallsM., & KarcherW. (1995). The validation of alternative test methods.ATLA23, 884–886.
7.
Anon. (1996). Use of (quantitative) structure-activity relationships (Q)SARs in risk assessment. In Technical Guidance Documents in Support of the Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for New Notified Substances and the Commission Regulation (EC) 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for Existing Substances, pp. 517–526. Luxembourg: CEC.
ToplissJ.G., & CostelloR.J. (1972). Chance correlations in structure-activity studies using multiple regression analysis.Journal of Medicinal Chemistry15, 1066–1068.
10.
KubinyiH. (1994). Variable selection in QSAR studies. I. An evolutionary algorithm.Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships13, 285–294.
11.
BlaauboerB.J., BaylissM.K., CastellJ.V., EveloC.T.A., FrazierJ.M., GroenK., GuldenM., GuillouzoA., HissinkA.M., HoustonJ.B., JohansonG., de JonghJ., KedderisG.L., ReinhardtC.A., van de SandtJ.J.M., & SeminoG. (1996). The use of biokinetics and in vitro methods in toxicological risk evaluation. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 15 ATLA24, 473–497.
12.
ArcherG., BallsM., BrunerL., CurrenR.C., FentemJ.H., HolzhutterH-G., LiebschM., LovellD., & SoutheeJ. (1997). The validation of toxicological prediction models.ATLA25505–516.
13.
ChatfieldC. (1995). Model uncertainty, data mining and statistical inference.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A158, 419–466.