An alternative method is shown to consist of two parts: the test system itself; and a prediction model for converting in vitro endpoints into predictions of in vivo toxicity. For the alternative method to be relevant and reliable, it is important that its prediction model component is of high predictive power and is sufficiently robust against sources of data variability. In other words, the prediction model must be subjected to criticism, leading successful models to the state of confirmation. It is shown that there are certain circumstances in which a new prediction model may be introduced without the necessity to generate new test system data.
BallsM., BlaauboerB.J., BrusickD., FrazierJ., LambD., PembertonM., ReinhardtC., RoberfroidM., RosenkranzH., SchmidB., SpielmannH., StammatiA-L., & WalumE. (1990). Report and recommendations of the CAAT/ERGATT workshop on the validation of toxicity test procedures.ATLA18, 303–337.
2.
BallsM., BlaauboerB., FentemJ.H., BrunerL., CombesR.D., EkwallB., FielderR.J., GuillouzoA., LewisR.W., LovellD.P., ReinhardtC.A., RepettoG., SladowskiD., SpielmannH., and ZuccoF. (1995). Practical aspects of the validation of toxicity test procedures. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 5.ATLA23, 129–147.
3.
BallsM., and FentemJ.H. (1997). Progress toward the validation of alternative tests.ATLA25, 33–43.
4.
BrunerL.H., CarrG.J., ChamberlainM., and CurrenR.D. (1996). Validation of alternative methods for toxicity testing.Toxicology in Vitro10, 479–501.
5.
BoxG.E.P., HunterW.G., and HunterJ.S. (1978). Statistics for Experimenters, 653 pp. New York: John Wiley.
6.
PirsigR.M. (1974). Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, 424 pp. London: Vintage.
7.
HolzhütterH-G., ArcherG., DamiN., LovellD.P., SaltelliA., & SjöströmM. (1996). Recommendations for the application of biostatistical methods during the development and validation of alternative toxicological methods. ECVAM bio-statistics task force report 1.ATLA24, 511–530.
8.
BarrattM.D., DixitM.B., and JonesP.A. (1996). The use of in vitro cytotoxicity measurements in QSAR methods for the prediction of the skin corrosivity potential of acids.Toxicology in Vitro10, 283–290.
9.
BlaauboerB.J., BallsM., BianchiV., BolcsfoldiG., GuillouzoA., MooreG.A., OdlandL., ReinhardtC.A., SpielmannH., and WalumE. (1994). The ECITTS integrated toxicity testing scheme: the application of in vitro test systems to the hazard assessment of chemicals.Toxicology in Vitro8, 845–846.
10.
WalumE., BallsM., BianchiB., BlaauboerB.J., BolcsfoldiG., GuillouzoA., MooreG.A., OdlandL., ReinhardtC., and SpielmannH. (1992). ECITTS: an integrated approach to the application of in vitro test systems to the hazard assessment of chemicals.ATLA20, 406–428.
11.
ZhangP. (1992). Inference after variable selection in linear regression models.Biometrika79, 741–746.
12.
ChatfieldC. (1995). Model uncertainty, data mining and statistical inference (with discussion).Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A158, 419–466.
13.
AnscombeF.J. (1967). Topics in the investigation of linear relations fitted by the method of least squares (with discussion).Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B29, 1–52.
14.
CurrenR.C., SoutheeJ.A., SpielmannH., LiebschM., FentemJ.H., and BallsM. (1995). The role of prevalidation in the development, validation and acceptance of alternative methods.ATLA23, 211–217.
15.
StoneM. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B36, 111–147.
