BallsM., BlaauboerB., BrusickD., FrazierJ., LambD., PembertonM., ReinhardtC., RoberfroidM., RosenkranzH., SchmidB., SpielmannH., StammatiA.L., and WalumE. (1990). Report and recommendations of the CAAT/ERGATT workshop on the validation of toxicity test procedures.ATLA18, 313–337.
2.
BallsM., BlaauboerB.J., FentemJ., BrunerL., CombesR.D., EkwallB., FielderR.J., GuillouzoA., LewisR.W., LovellD.P., ReinhardtC.A., RepettoG., SladowskiD., SpielmannH., and ZuccoF. (1995). Practical aspects of the validation of toxicity test procedures. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 5.ATLA23, 129–147.
3.
CurrenR.D., SoutheeJ.A., SpielmannH., LiebschM., FentemJ., and BallsM. (1995). The role of prevalidation in the development, validation and acceptance of alternative methods.ATLA23, 211–217.
4.
BrunerL., CarrG., ChamberlainM., and CurrenR. (1996). No prediction model, no validation study.ATLA24, 139–142.
5.
FlintO. (1996). Test validation: a learning process.In Vitro Toxicology9, 1–2.
6.
BallsM., BothamP.A., BrunerL.H., and SpielmannH. (1995). The EC/HO international validation study on alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test.Toxicology in Vitro9, 871–929.
7.
SpielmannH., LiebschM., MoldenhauerF., HolzhütterH.G., BagleyD.M., LipmanJ.M., PapeW.J.W., MiltenburgerH., de SilvaO., HoferH., and SteilingW. (1996). IRAG working group 2 report: CAM-based assays.Food and Chemical Toxicology, in press.
8.
Anon. (1992). Eye Irritation: Reference Chemicals Data Bank, ECETOC Technical Report No. 48, 11 pp. & appendix 145 pp. Brussels: ECETOC.
9.
ArcherG. (1996). No statistics, no science — let alone validation studies.ATLA24, 453–456.