RussellW.M.S, & BurchR.L. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, 238 pp. London: Methuen.
3.
RussellW.M.S, & BurchR.L. (1992). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, 238 pp. Potters Bar, Herts., UK: UFAW.
4.
RussellW.M.S. (1995). The development of the Three Rs concept.ATLA23, 298–304.
5.
Anon. (1957). UFAW Symposium on Humane Technique in the Laboratory.Collected Papers of the Laboratory Animals Bureau6, 5–81.
6.
HumeC.W. (1962). The vivisection controversy in Britain. In Man and Beast (ed. HumeC.W.), pp. 57–70. Potters Bar, Herts, UK: UFAW.
7.
AnnettB.H. (1995). The Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments (FRAME): the first 25 years.ATLA23, 19–32.
8.
Anon. (1876). An Act to Amend the Law Relating to Cruelty to Animals, 8 pp. London: HMSO.
9.
HollandsC. (1995). Achieving the unachievable: a review of animals in politics.ATLA23, 33–38.
10.
SmythD. (1978). Alternatives to Animal Experiments, 218 pp. London: Scolar Press.
11.
Anon. (1986). European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes, 51 pp. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
12.
Anon. (1986). Council Directive of 24 November 1986 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes.Official Journal of the European CommunitiesL358, 1–29.
13.
Anon. (1983). Animal Experimentation in the United Kingdom: Proposals Submitted to the Home Secretary by the BVA, CRAE and FRAME, 8 pp. Edinburgh: CRAE.
14.
Anon. (1983). Scientific Procedures on Living Animals, 34 pp. Cmnd. 8883. London: HMSO.
15.
Anon. (1985). Scientific Procedures on Living Animals, 25 pp. Cmnd. 9521. London: HMSO.
FrazierJ.M., and GoldbergA.M. (1990). Alternatives to and reduction of animal use in biomedical research, education and testing.ATLA18, 65–74.
18.
GoldbergA.M., FrazierJ.M., BrusickD., DickensM.S., FlintO., GettingsS.D., HillR.N., LipnickR.L., RenskersK.J., BradlawJ.A., ScalaR.A., VeronesiB., GreenS., WilcoxN.L., and CurrenR.D. (1993). Report of the Validation and Technology Transfer Committee of the Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing. Framework for validation and implementation of in vitro toxicity tests.Xenobiotica23, 563–572.
19.
Anon. (1986). Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.30 pp. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services.
20.
Anon. (1986). Alternatives to Animal Use in Research, Testing and Education, 441 pp. Washington, DC: US Congress Office of Technology Assessment.
21.
Howard-JonesN. (1985). A CIOMS ethical code for animal experimentation.WHO Chronicle39(2), 51–56.
22.
GoldbergA.M., & van ZutphenL.F.M. Eds., (1995). Alternative Methods in Toxicology and the Life Sciences, Vol. 11, The World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences: Education, Research, Testing, 738 pp. New York: Mary Ann Liebert.
23.
Anon. (1995). Great Britain — animal numbers.The Alternatives Report7(2), 1–2.
24.
Anon. (1993). Zo Doende 1993. Animal Numbers — The Netherlands, 28 pp. Rijswijk, The Netherlands: Veterinary Public Health Inspectorate.
25.
RowanA.N., LoewF.M., and WeerJ. (1995). The Animal Research Controversy. Protest, Process and Public Policy; An Analysis of Strategic Issues, 210 pp. North Grafton, MA, USA: Tufts Center for Animals & Public Policy.
26.
StokesW.S., and JensenD.J. (1995). Guidelines for Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees: consideration of alternatives.Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science34(3), 51–60.
27.
SmithJ.A., and BoydK.M. Eds., (1991). Lives in the Balance: The Ethics of Using Animals in Biomedical Research, 352 pp. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28.
StraughanD.W. (1995). The role of the Home Office Inspector.ATLA23, 39–49.
29.
Anon. (1989). US Department of Agriculture; Animal Welfare; Final Rules: Code of Federal Regulations Parts 1, 2, and 3.Federal Register54(168), 36,112–36,163.
30.
Anon. (1988). Use of Laboratory Animals in Biomedical and Behavioral Research., 102 pp. Washington, DC: National Academy Press (National Research Council).
31.
FestingM.F.W. (1979). Inbred Strains in Biomedical Research, 483 pp. London: Macmillan.
32.
HendriksenC.F.M., SlobW., van der GunJ.W., WestendorpJ.H.L., den BiemenM., HespA., & van ZutphenL.F.M. (1994). Immunogenicity testing of diphtheria and tetanus vaccines by using isogenic mice with possible implications for potency testing.Laboratory Animals28, 121–129.
33.
FoxM.W. (1986). Laboratory Animal Husbandry: Ethology, Welfare and Experimental Variables, 267 pp. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
34.
FabianR., FetrowN., GreenerY., ZelingerD., OlsonH., and DeanJ. (1993). Reduction of animal use with improved procedure for acute tolerance assessment.Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology18, 206–213.
35.
MullerK.E., BartonC.N., and BenignusV.A. (1984). Recommendations for appropriate statistical practice in toxicological experiments.Neurotoxicology5, 113–126.
36.
FestingM.F.W. (1992). The scope for improving the design of laboratory animal experiments.Laboratory Animals26, 256–267.
37.
FestingM.F.W. (1994). Reduction of animal use: experimental design and quality of experiments.Laboratory Animals28, 212–221.
38.
FestingM.F.W.Are animal experiments in toxicological research the “right” size? In Statistics in Toxicology (ed. MorganB.J.T.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, in press.
39.
FestingM.F.W. (1995). Reduction in animal use 35 years after Russell & Burch's Principles of Humane Experimental Technique.ATLA23, 51–60.
40.
AltaianD.G. (1982). Misuse of statistics is unethical. In Statistics in Practice (ed. GoreS.M., AltmanD.G.), pp. 1–2. London: British Medical Association.
41.
AltmanD.G. (1982). Statistics in medical journals.Statistics in Medicine1, 59–71.
42.
CoxG.M. (1958). Planning Experiments, 208 pp. New York: John Wiley.
43.
CochranW.G., and CoxG.M. (1957). Experimental Designs, 611 pp. New York: John Wiley.
44.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences, 2nd edn, 567 pp. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45.
AltmanD.G. (1991). Practical Statistics for Medical Research, 611 pp. London: Chapman & Hall.
46.
MeadR., and CurnowR.N. (1983). Statistical Methods in Agriculture and Experimental Biology, 335 pp. London: Chapman & Hall.
47.
MullerK.E., and BenignusV.A. (1992). Increasing scientific power with statistical power.Neurotoxicology and Teratology14, 211–219.
48.
SnedecorW.G., and CochranW.G. (1980). Statistical Methods, 507 pp. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University Press.
49.
Anon. (1992). Recognition and Alleviation of Pain and Distress in Laboratory Animals, 137 pp. Washington, DC: National Academy Press (Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources).
50.
MortonD.B.How we can measure animal pain and suffering. In Proceedings of the Animals in Science Conference, 19–21 April 1995, Monash UniversityClayton, Australia, in press.
51.
RowanA. (1995). The third R: refinement.ATLA23, 332–346.
52.
FlecknellP.A. (1994). Refinement of animal use — assessment and alleviation of pain and distress.Laboratory Animals28, 222–231.
53.
ManserC.E. (1992). The Assessment of Stress in Laboratory Animals, 208 pp. Horsham, UK: RSPCA.'
54.
ZimmermanM. (1983). Ethical guidelines for investigations of experimental pain in conscious animals.Pain16, 109–110.
55.
Anon. (1988). UKCCCR guidelines for the welfare of animals in experimental neoplasia.Laboratory Animals22, 195–201.
56.
Anon. (1992). Antibody production — advice on protocols for minimal severity. In Report of the Animal Procedures Committee for 1991, Appendix II, 37 pp. Cmnd 2048. London: HMSO.
57.
AcredP., HennesseyT.D., MacArthur–ClarkJ.A., MerrikinD.J., RyanD.M., SmuldersH.C., TrokeP.F., WilsonR.G., and StraughanD.W. (1994). Guidelines for the welfare of animals in rodent protection tests. A report from the Rodent Protection Test Working Party.Laboratory Animals28, 13–18.
58.
MortonD.B., and GriffithsP.H.M. (1985). Guidelines on the recognition of pain, distress and discomfort in experimental animals and an hypothesis for assessment.Veterinary Record116, 431–436.
59.
MortonD.B. (1986). 2nd BVA Animal Welfare Foundation Symposium: The Recognition of Pain, Distress and Discomfort in Small Laboratory Mammals and its Assessment:London: BVA.
60.
BarclayR.J., HerbertW.J., and PooleT.B. Eds., (1988). The Disturbance Index: a Behavioural Method of Assessing the Severity of Common Laboratory Procedures on Rodents, 36 pp. Potters Bar, Herts., UK: UFAW.
61.
MortonD.B., AbbotD., BarclayR., CloseB.S., EwbankR., GaskD., HeathM., MatticS., PooleT., SeamerJ., SoutheeJ., ThompsonA., TrussellB., WestC., and JenningsM. (1993). First report of the BVA/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement: removal of blood from laboratory mammals and birds.Laboratory Animals27, 1–22.
62.
MortonD.B., JenningsM., BatchelorG.R., BellD., BirkeL., DaviesK., EveleighJ.R., GunnD., HeathM., HowardB., KoderP., PhillipsJ., PooleT., SainsburyA.W., SalesG.D., SmithD.J.A., StauffacherM., and TurnerR.J. (1993). Refinements in rabbit husbandry. Second report of the BVAAWF/FRAME/RSPCA/UFAW Joint Working Group on Refinement.Laboratory Animals27, 301–329.
63.
MortonD.B. (1992). A fair press for animals.New Scientist1816, 28–30.
64.
ChanceM.R.A. (1957). The contribution of environment to uniformity; variance control, refinement in pharmacology.Collected Papers of the Laboratory Animals Bureau6, 59–74.
65.
ReeseE.P. (1991). The role of husbandry in promoting welfare of laboratory animals. In Replacement, Reduction and Refinement: Present Possibilities and Future Prospects (ed. HendriksenC.F.M., & KoëterH.B.W.M.), pp. 155–192. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
66.
BroomD.M., and JohnsonK.G. (1993). Stress and Animal Welfare, 211 pp. London: Chapman & Hall.
67.
NiemiS.M., and WillsonJ.E. Eds (1993). Refinement and Reduction in Animal Testing, 138 pp. Bethesda, MD, USA: Scientists Center for Animal Welfare.
68.
ClaassenV. (1994). Neglected Factors in Pharmacology and Neuroscience Research, 486 pp. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
69.
GardnerB.T., and GardnerR.A. (1989). What banner shall we fly?PsyETA Bulletin8(2), 5–7.
70.
BallsM. (1994). Replacement of animal procedures: alternatives in research, education and testing.Laboratory Animals28, 193–211.
71.
StephensM.L. (1989). Replacing animal experiments. In Animal Experimentation: the Consensus Changes (ed. LangleyG.), pp. 144–168. London: Macmillan.
72.
BallsM. (1993). How far advanced is the replacement of animal experimentation?In Vitro Toxicology6, 149–161.
73.
BallsM., BlaauboerB.J., FentemJ.H., BrunerL., CombesR.D., EkwallB., FielderR.J., GuillouzoA., LewisR.W., LovellD.P., ReinhardtC.A., RepettoG., SladowskiD., SpielmannH., and ZuccoF. (1995). Practical aspects of the validation of toxicity test procedures. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 5.ATLA23, 129–147.
74.
ClarkD.G. (1994). Barriers to the acceptance of in vitro alternatives.Toxicology in Vitro8, 907–909.
75.
BallsM. (1992). In vitro test validation: high hurdling but not pole vaulting.ATLA20, 355–357.
76.
BallsM., BlaauboerB., BrusickD., FrazierJ., LambD., PembertonM., ReinhardtC., RoberfroidM., RosenkranzH., SchmidB., SpielmannH., StammatiA–L., & WalumE. (1990). Report and recommendations of the CAAT/ERGATT workshop on the validation of toxicity test procedures.ATLA18, 313–337.
77.
PurchaseI.F.H. (1990). An international reference chemical data bank would accelerate the development, validation and regulatory acceptance of alternative toxicology tests.ATLA18, 345–348.
78.
BagleyD.M., BothamP.A., GardnerJ.R., HollandG., KreilingR., LewisR.W., StringerD.A., and WalkerA.P. (1992). Eye irritation: reference chemicals data bank.Toxicology in Vitro6, 487–491.
79.
van ZutphenL.F.M., & vander ValkJ.B.F. (1995). Education and training: a basis for the introduction of the Three Rs alternatives into animal research.ATLA23, 123–127.
80.
Anon. (1995). FELASA recommendations on the education and training of persons working with laboratory animals: categories A and C.Laboratory Animals29, 121–131.
81.
Anon. (1991). Education and Training in the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals: a Guide for Developing Institutional Programs, 139 pp. Washington, DC: National Academy Press (National Research Council).
82.
van ZutphenL.F.M., BaumansV., and BeynenA.C. Eds., (1993). Principles of Laboratory Animal Science. A Contribution to the Humane Use and Care of Animals and to the Quality of Experimental Results, 389 pp. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
83.
RussellW.M.S. (1988). Ethology, conditioning and learning.Behavioral and Brain Sciences11, 464–465.
84.
ChanceM.R.A., and MackintoshJ.H. (1975). A class in the observation of behaviour.Biology and Human Affairs40, 131–136.
85.
FosseR.T. (1995). The role of animals and alternatives in education. In Alternative Methods in Toxicology and the Life Sciences, Vol. 11, The World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences: Education, Research, Testing (ed. GoldbergA.M., & van ZutphenL.F.M.), pp. 23–29. New York: Mary Ann Liebert.
86.
SmithK., SmithA., and FosseR.T. Eds., (1993). NORINA: a Norwegian Inventory of Audiovisuals., Oslo: Norwegian Veterinary College.
87.
StephensM.L. (1987). The significance of alternative techniques in biomedical research: an analysis of Nobel Prize awards. In Advances in Animal Welfare Science 1986/1987 (ed. FoxM.W., MickleyL.D.), pp. 19–31. Boston, MA, USA: Martinus Nijhof.
88.
BlumD. (1995). The Monkey Wars, 306 pp. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DaviesB. (1994). Poster campaign aimed to get people thinking.RDS News (July), 1–2.
91.
ZurloJ., RudacilleD., and GoldbergA.M. (1994). Animals and Alternatives in Testing — History, Science and Ethics, 86 pp. New York: Mary Ann Liebert.
92.
StephensM.L. (1986). Alternatives to Current Uses of Animals in Research, Safety Testing, and Education: A Layman's Guide, 86 pp. Washington, DC: The Humane Society of the United States.
93.
BallsM., FentemJ., and JointE. (1992). Animal Experiments, 16 pp. Cambridge: Hobsons.
94.
FentemJ., BallsM., and RobinsonP. (1993). Developing Alternatives to Animal Experimentation, 20 pp. Cambridge: Hobsons.
95.
HendriksenC.F.M., GarthoffB., AggerbeckH., BrucknerL., CastleP., CusslerK., DobbelaerR., van de DonkH., van der GunJ., LefrancoisS., MilstienJ., MinorP.D., MougeotH., RombautB., RonnebergerH.D., SpieserJ.M., StolpR., StraughanD.W., TollisM., and ZigtermansG. (1994). Alternatives to animal testing in the quality control of immunobiologicals: current status and future prospects. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 4.ATLA22, 420–434.
96.
van der KampM.D.O. (1994). Ways of Replacing, Reducing or Refining the Use of Animals in the Quality Control of Veterinary Vaccines, 107 pp. Lelystad, The Netherlands: ID–DLO.
97.
HendriksenC.F.M., & van der GunJ. (1995). Animal models and alternatives in the quality control of vaccines: are in vitro methods or in vivo methods the scientific equivalent of the emperor's new clothes?ATLA23, 61–73.
98.
StokesW.S. (1994). Alternative test method development at the National Toxicology Program. In Proceedings of the Toxicology Forum Winter Meeting, pp. 302–312. Washington, DC: Toxicology Forum.
99.
PooleT.B. (1995). Welfare considerations with regard to transgenic animals.Animal Welfare4, 81–85.
100.
van der MeerM., BaumansV., & van ZutphenL.F.M. (1995). Transgenic animals: what about their well–being?Scandinavian Journal of Laboratory Animal Science, in press.
101.
FoxM.W. (1992). Superpigs and Wondercorn, The Brave New World of Biotechnology., 192 pp. New York: Lyons & Burford.
102.
MooreC.J., and MephamT.B. (1995). Transgenesis and animal welfare.ATLA23, 380–397.
103.
BallsM. (1995). On the ethical and scientific need for assessing the potential benefit of research likely to cause suffering to protected animals. In Alternative Methods in Toxicology and the Life Sciences, Vol. 11, The World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences: Education, Research, Testing (ed. GoldbergA.M., & van ZutphenL.F.M.), pp. 575–580. New York: Mary Ann Liebert.
104.
Anon. (1995). Research Involving Animals. A Role for Institutional Ethics Committees?, 9 pp. Edinburgh: The Boyd Group.
105.
de Cock BuningT., and TheuneE. (1994). A comparison of three models for ethical evaluation of propośed animal experiments.Animal Welfare3, 107–128.
106.
PorterD.G. (1992). Ethical scores for animal experiments.Nature356, 101–102.
107.
Anon. (1994). Assessment of benefit and severity. In Report of the Animal Procedures Committee for 1993, Appendix 1, pp. 22–29. Cmnd 2730. London: HMSO.
108.
Anon. (1993). Council Directive 93/35/EEC of 14 June 1993 amending for the sixth time Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products.Official Journal of the European CommunitiesL151, 32–36.
109.
Anon. (1976). Council Directive 76/768/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products.Official Journal of the European CommunitiesL262, 169–172.
110.
BallsM., De KlerckW., BakerF., van BeekM., BouillonC., BrunerL., CarstensenJ., ChamberlainM., CottinM., CurrenR., DupuisJ., FairweatherF., FaureU., FentemJ., FisherC., GalliC., KemperF., KnaapA., LangleyG., LoprienoG., LoprienoN., PapeW., PechovitchG., SpielmannH., UngarK., WhiteI., and ZuangV. (1995). Development and validation of non–animal tests and testing strategies: the identification of a coordinated response to the challenge and the opportunity presented by the Sixth Amendment to the Cosmetics Directive (76/768/EEC). The report and recommendations of an ECVAM/CPS workshop (ECVAM workshop 7).ATLA23, 398–409.
111.
Anon. (1992). Towards Sustainability – A European Community Programme of Policy and Action in Relation to the Environment and Sustainable Development. COM (92) 2.3 final.Official Journal of the European CommunitiesC138, 1–98.
112.
BallsM. (1995). The use of non–human primates as laboratory animals in Europe: moving toward the zero option.ATLA23, 284–286.