Reduction,Refinement and Replacement: The End of an Era,New Beginnings,and New Challenges

Balls M. (1995). On keeping your eyes on the prize: Dorothy Hegarty and acceptance of the concept of replacement alternatives in research, education and testing. ATLA 23, 756–774.

Balls M. , Goldberg A.M. , Fentem J.H. , Broadhead C.L. , Burch B.L. , Festing M.F.W. , Frazier J.M. , Hendriksen C.F.M. , Jennings M. , van der Kamp M.D.O. , Morton D.B. , Rowan A.N. , Russell C. , Russell W.M.S. , Spielmann H. , Stephens M.L. , Stokes W.S. , Straughan D.W. , Yager J.D. , Zurlo J. , & van Zutphen B.F.M. (1995). The Three Rs: The Way Forward. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 11. ATLA 23, 838–866.

Russell W.M.S. , and Burch R.L. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique., 238 pp. London: Methuen. Facsimile edition (1992). Potters Bar, Herts., UK: UFAW.

Balls M. (1995). Acceptance of the Three Rs concept — a battle won. ATLA 23, 1–3.

Landsell H. (1993). The Three Rs: a restrictive and refutable rigmarole. Ethics & Behavior 3, 177–185.

Russell W.M.S. (1995). The development of the Three Rs concept. ATLA 23, 298–304.