BallsM. (1995). On keeping your eyes on the prize: Dorothy Hegarty and acceptance of the concept of replacement alternatives in research, education and testing.ATLA23, 756–774.
2.
BallsM., GoldbergA.M., FentemJ.H., BroadheadC.L., BurchB.L., FestingM.F.W., FrazierJ.M., HendriksenC.F.M., JenningsM., van der KampM.D.O., MortonD.B., RowanA.N., RussellC., RussellW.M.S., SpielmannH., StephensM.L., StokesW.S., StraughanD.W., YagerJ.D., ZurloJ., & van ZutphenB.F.M. (1995). The Three Rs: The Way Forward. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 11.ATLA23, 838–866.
3.
RussellW.M.S., and BurchR.L. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique., 238 pp. London: Methuen. Facsimile edition (1992). Potters Bar, Herts., UK: UFAW.
4.
BallsM. (1995). Acceptance of the Three Rs concept — a battle won.ATLA23, 1–3.
5.
LandsellH. (1993). The Three Rs: a restrictive and refutable rigmarole.Ethics & Behavior3, 177–185.
6.
RussellW.M.S. (1995). The development of the Three Rs concept.ATLA23, 298–304.