BallsM., BlaauboerB., BrusickD., FrazierJ., LambD., PembertonM., ReinhardtC., RoberfroidM., RosenkranzH., SchmidB., SpielmannH., StammatiA.L., and WalumE. (1990). Report and recommendations of the CAAT/ERGATT workshop on the validation of toxicity test procedures.ATLA18, 313–337.
3.
BallsM. (1992). In vitro test validation: high hurdling but not pole vaulting.ATLA20, 355–357.
4.
BallsM., BothamP., CordierA., FumeroS., KayserD., KoëterH., KoundakjianP., LindquistN.G., MeyerO., PiodaL., ReinhardtC., RozemondH., SmyrniotisT., SpielmannH., Van LooyH., van der VenneM.T., and WalumE. (1990). Report and recommendations of an international workshop on promotion of the regulatory acceptance of validated non-animal toxicity test procedures.ATLA18, 339–344.
5.
EkwallB. (1992). Validation of in vitro cytotoxicity tests. In In Vitro Alternatives to Animal Pharmaco-toxicology (ed. CastellJ.V., & Gómez-LechónM.J.), pp. 361–390. Madrid, Spain: Farmaindustria.
6.
EkwallB., BondessonI., HellbergS., HögbergJ., RomertL., StenbergK., and WalumE. (1991). Validation of in vitro cytotoxicity tests — past and present strategies.ATLA19, 226–233.
7.
FlintO. (1992). In vitro test validation: a house built on sand.ATLA20, 196–198.
8.
WalumE., ClemedsonC., and EkwallB. (1994). Principles for the validation of in vitro toxicology test methods.Toxicology in Vitro8, 807–812.
9.
GoldbergA.M., FrazierJ.M., BrusickD., DickensM.S., FlintO., GettingsS.D., HillR.N., LipnickR.L., RenskersK.J., BradlawJ.A., ScalaR.A., VeronesiB., GreenS., WilcoxN.L., and CurrenR.D. (1993). Report of the Validation and Technology Transfer Committee of the Johns Hopkins Center for Alternatives to Animal Testing. Framework for validation and implementation of in vitro toxicity tests.Xenobiotica23, 563–572.
10.
FrazierJ.F. ed. (1993). CAAT Technical Report No. 5: Report on the CAAT/TCA Workshop on the International Status of Validation of In Vitro Toxicity Tests.Baltimore, USA: CAAT.
11.
OhnoY., KanekoT., KobayashiT., InoueT., KuroiwaY., YoshidaT., MommaJ., HayashiM., AkiyamaJ., AtsumiT., ChibaK., EndoT., FujiiA., KakishimaH., KojimaH., MasamotoK., MasudaM., MatsukawaS., OhkoshiK., OkadaJ., SakamotoK., TakanoK., and TakanakaA. (1994). First-phase validation of the in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients.In Vitro Toxicology7, 89–101.
12.
FrazierJ.F. (1994). The role of mechanistic toxicology in test method validation.Toxicology in Vitro8, 787–791.
13.
BasketterD.A., ScholesE.W., KimberI., BothamP.A., HiltonJ., MillerK., RobbinsM.C., HarrisonP.T.C., and WaiteS.J. (1991). Interlaboratory evaluation of the local lymph node assay with 25 chemicals and comparison with guinea-pig test data.Toxicology Methods1, 30–43.
14.
van den HeuvelM.J., ClarkD.C., FielderR.J., KoundakjianP.P., OliverG.J.A., PellingD., TomlinsonN.J., and WalkerA.P. (1990). The international validation of a fixed dose procedure as an alternative to the classical LD50 test.Food and Chemical Toxicology28, 469–482.
15.
BlaauboerB.J., BallsM., BianchiV., BolcsfoldiG., GuillouzoA., MooreG.A., OdlandL., ReinhardtC.A., SpielmannH., and WalumE. (1994). The ECITTS integrated toxicity testing scheme: the application of in vitro test systems to the hazard assessment of chemicals.Toxicology in Vitro8, 845–846.
16.
WalumE., BallsM., BianchiV., BlaauboerB., BolcsfoldiG., GuillouzoA., MooreG.A., OdlandL., ReinhardtC., and SpielmannH. (1992). ECITTS: an integrated approach to the application of in vitro test systems to the hazard assessment of chemicals.ATLA20, 406–428.
17.
KoëterH.B.W.M. (1994). Principles for a pragmatic approach to the regulatory acceptance of alternative tests.Toxicology in Vitro8, 925–930.
18.
UngarK. (1993). INVITTOX: promoting in vitro methods for toxicity testing.AATEX2, 37–43.
19.
Anon. (1992). Environment Monograph No. 45: The OECD Principles of Good Laboratory Practice 1, 29 pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
20.
Anon. (1981). The OECD Principles of Good Laboratory Practice: Annex II of the decision of the Council concerning the mutual acceptance of data in the assessment of chemicals [C(81) 30 (Final)], 25 pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
21.
Anon. (1981). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals.Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
22.
BagleyD.M., BothamP.A., GardnerJ.R., HollandG., KreilingR., LewisR.W., StringerD.A., and WalkerA.P. (1992). Eye irritation: reference chemicals data bank.Toxicology in Vitro6, 487–491.
23.
SpielmannH., LovellW.W., HölzleE., JohnsonB.E., MaurerT., MirandaM.A., PapeW.J.W., SaporaO., and SladowskiD. (1994). In vitro phototoxicity testing. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 2.ATLA22, 314–348.
24.
PurchaseI.F.H. (1990). An international reference chemical data bank would accelerate the development, validation and regulatory acceptance of alternative toxicology tests.ATLA18, 345–348.
25.
SnedecorG.W., and CochranW.G. (1980). Statistical Methods, 7th edn.Iowa, USA: Iowa State University Press.