Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

In vitro evaluation of ocular irritation requires the use of a battery of tests, for example cell culture assays and the HET-CAM test. In order to check the field applications of the different methods and their complementation, we have studied the EYTEX™ physicochemical model in an internal validation study.

In this study, we compared the EYTEX™ results with the in vitro ocular irritation potencies of 52 formulations and 49 chemicals. The in vivo/in vitro correlation was highly significant, p < 0.01%, K = 0.8 (Kappa method). On the other hand, the concordance, sensitivity and specificity of this method were, 85%, 89% and 83% respectively. The compatability of 98% obtained showed the kit to be applicable to cosmetic formulations.

The EYTEX™ system has also been evaluated during a comparative study of EYTEX™ human clinical tests, performed on 12 finished products; we have observed a concordance equal to 92%, indicating an excellent correlation between the two methodologies.

These results suggest that the EYTEX™ test could be a reliable in vitro prescreening system for determining the eye irritation potential of cosmetic formulations, and that it should be accepted as a component of our battery of alternative methods.

Keywords

ocular irritation alternative methods complementation EYTEX™human clinical test prescreening system

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Shopsis

, and Sathe

(1984). Uridine uptake inhibition as a cytotoxicity test: correlation with the Draize test. Toxicology 29, 195–206.

North-Root

, Yackovich

, Demetrulias

, Gacula

, and Heinze

J.E.

(1985). Prediction of the eye irritation potential of shampoos using the in vitro SIRC cell toxicity test. Food and Chemical Toxicology 23, 271–273.

Luepke

N.P.

(1985). Hen's egg chorio-allantoic membrane test for irritation potential. Food and Chemical Toxicology 23, 287–291.

O'Brien

K.A.F.

, Jones

D.A.

, and Rockley

(1990). Evaluation of an agarose overlay assay to determine the eye irritation potential of detergent based products. Toxicology in Vitro 4, 311–313.

Gordon

V.C.

, and Bergman

H.C.

(1987). EYTEX™: an in vitro method for evaluation of ocular irritancy. In Alternative Methods in Toxicology, Vol 5, Approaches to Validation. (ed. Goldberg

A.M.

), pp. 293–302. New York: Mary Ann Liebert.

Draize

, Woodward

, and Calvery

H.O.

(1944). Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 82, 377–389.

Fledman

J.B.

(1948). Practical application of surface active drugs in ophthalmology. Archives of Ophthalmology 40, 668–679.

Marsh

R.J.

(1971). Influence of non-ionic detergents and other surfactants on human corneal permeability. Experimental Eye Research 11, 43–48.

Koch (1982). Evaluation of possible drug side-effects on the eye in human volunteers. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde 180, 70–74.

10.

Rein (1977). Toxicological testing on cornea, conjunctiva and tears. Arzneimittel nebein wirkungen An Ange, 216–258.

11.

Liotet

(1982). Diagnostic biologique des conjonctivites. In Encyclopedic medico chirurgicale, opthalmologie. Paris: Editions Techniques.

12.

Mancini

, Carbonara

A.O.

, and Heremans

J.F.

(1965). Immunochemical quantitation of antigens by single radical immunodiffusion. Immunochemisty 2, 235–254.

Evaluation of the EYTEX™ System as a Screening Method for Ocular Tolerance: Application to Raw Materials and Finished Products

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References