FlintO.P. (1992). In vitro test validation: a house built on sand.ATLA20, 196–198.
2.
BallsM., BlaauboerB., BrusickD., FrazierJ., LambD., PembertonM., ReinhardtC, RoberfroidM., RosenkrantzH., SchmidB., SpielmannH., StammatiA-L., & WalumE. (1990). Report and recommendations of the CAAT ERGATT workshop on the validation of toxicity test procedures.ATLA18, 313–336.
3.
BallsM., & FentemJ H. (1992). The use of basal cytotoxicity and target organ toxicity tests in hazard identification and risk assessment.ATLA20, 368–388.
4.
MillerS.K. (1992). Monkey with HIV gives chimps a break.New Scientist (London), 1,827.
5.
BallsM. (1992). The validation and acceptance of in vitro toxicity tests. In In Vitro Methods in Toxicology (ed. JollesG.), pp. 511–519. London: Academic Press.
6.
KruszewskiF.H., HearnL.H., SmithK.T., TealJ.J., GordonV.C., and DickensM.S. (1992). Application of the EYTEX™ system to the evaluation of cosmetic products and their ingredients.ATLA20, 146–163.
7.
Anon. (1991). Animals and Alternatives in Toxicology: Present Status and Future Prospects (The Second Report of the FRAME Toxicity Committee).ATLA19, 116–138.
