The keeping of experimental animals requires housing systems appropriate to the needs and behaviour of each species, as demanded by various supranational and national guidelines. It is questionable whether conventional housing systems for rodents such as mice, rats and guinea-pigs meet this demand. It is suggested that the housing of laboratory rodents should be improved by the use of larger and more appropriate cage types, as well as by reducing the monotony of conventional housing systems.
RussellW.M.S., and BurchR.L. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, 238 pp. London: Methuen.
2.
US Animal Welfare Act Amendments (contained in Food Security Act of 1985). Public Law 99–198. December 1985. Section 1752.
3.
BeaverB.V. (1989). Environmental enrichment for laboratory animals.ILAR News31, 5–11.
4.
NovakM.A., and SuomiS.J. (1989). Psychological well-being of primates in captivity.ILAR News31, 5–15.
5.
ReinhardtV. (1989). Evaluation of the long-term effectiveness of two environmental enrichment objects for singly caged rhesus macaques.Laboratory Animals18, 13–33.
6.
European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrate Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes. Council of Europe, Strasbourg 31.5.85.
7.
Council Directive of 24 November 1986 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes (86/609/EEC). Official Journal of the European Communities No. L358/1–28.
8.
MerkenschlagerM., and WilkW. eds. Gutachten über Tierversuche, Möglichkeiten ihrer Einschränkung und Ersetzbarkeit53 pp. Berlin & Hamburg: Paul Parey.
9.
Tierschutzverordnung der Schweiz vom 27. May 1981.
10.
Anon. (1989). Code of Practice for the Housing and Care of Animals Used in Scientific Procedures, 33 pp. London: HMSO.
11.
Anon. (1968). Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 56 pp. Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
12.
Van den HeuvelM.J., DayanA.D., and ShillakerR.O. (1987). Evaluation of the BTS approach to the testing of substances and preparations for their acute toxicity.Human Toxicology6, 279–291.
13.
FraserA.F. (1989). Animal welfare theory: the keyboard of the maintenance ethosystem.Applied Animal Behaviour Science22, 177–190.
BirbeckA.L. (1988). The welfare of animals: a shared responsibility.Veterinary Record123, 433–436.
16.
PetersA., and FestingM. (1990). Population density and growth rate in laboratory mice.Laboratory Animals24, 273–279.
17.
ArcherJ. (1973). Tests for emotionality in rats and mice: a review.Animal Behaviour21, 205–213.
18.
BarnettA. (1975). The Rat: A Study in Behaviour, 318 pp. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press
19.
ForgaysD.G. (1952). The nature of the effect of free-environmental experience in the rat.Journal of Comparative Physiology and Psychology45, 322–328.
20.
ManosevitzM. (1970). Early environmental enrichment and mouse behaviour.71459–466
21.
ChamoveA.S. (1989). Cage design reduces emotionality in mice.Laboratory Animals23, 215–22.
22.
HendersonN.D. (1970). Brain weight increases resulting from environmental enrichment: a direct dominance in mice.Science169, 776–778.
23.
WhiteW.J., BalkM.W., and LangCM. (1989). Use of cage space by guinea-pigs.Laboratory Animals
24.
GartnerK. (1990). A third component causing random variability beside environment and genotype. A reason for the limited success of a thirty year long effort to standardise laboratory animals?Laboratory Animals24, 71–77.
