BradnerW.T. (1978). New prescreens for antitumour antibiotics.Proc. 10th Int. Congr. Chemother. (in press)
2.
BuskirkH.H. (1969). Assay of cytotoxic agents with L1210 cells.Proc. Tissue Culture Assoc.20, 23
3.
Di MarcoA., ZunioF., and CasazzaA.M. (1978). Comparison of biochemical and biological methods in the evaluation of new anthracycline drugs.Proc. 10th Int. Congr. Chemother. (in press)
4.
EagleH., and FoleyG.E. (1956). The cytotoxic action of carcinolytic agents in tissue culture.Am. J. Med.21, 739–749
5.
FleckW. (1969). E. Coli - Zellum mit intaktem und defektem dunkelreparaturmechanismus für strukturschäden an der DNS als screeni-modell für die suche nach potentiellen carcinostatica.Zeitschr. Allg. Mikrobiol.9, 217–221.
6.
GauseG.F. (1978). Yeast mutants with distorted cell membranes as detection systems for anti tumour antibiotics.Proc. 10th Int. Congr. Chemother. (in press)
7.
GauseG.F., LaikoA.V., and SelesnevaT.I. (1976). Yeast Mutants with distorted cell membranes as tests in the screening for anti tumour antibiotics.Cancer Chemother. Rep.60, 637–638
HankaL.J. (1967). In vitro screen for antimetabolites.Proc. 5th Int. Congr. Chemother. pp 351–35, Vienna
10.
HankaL.J. (1974). Results of in vitro screening for antimetabolites. Proc. 5th Int. Congr. Chemother., DaikosG.K. ed., Vol. 3, pp 118–122, Helenic Society for ChemotherapyAthens
11.
HankaL.J., EvansJ.S., MasonD.J., and DietzA. (1966). Microbiological production of 5-azacytidine. I. Production and biological activity.Antimicrobial Agents & Chemotherapy pp 619–624American Society of MicrobiologyAnn Arbor.
12.
HankaL.J., and DietzA. (1976). U-43, 120: a new anti tumour antibiotic. I. Production, biological activity, microbial assay and taxonomy of the producing micro-organism.J. Antibiot. (Japan) 29, 611–617
13.
HankaL.J. (1978). A multi-end point in vitro system for detection of new anti-tumour drugs.Proc. 10th Int. Congr. Chemother. (in press)
14.
HeinemannB. (1971). Prophage induction in lysogenic bacteria as a method of detecting potential mutagenic, carcinogenic, carcinostatic and teratogenic agents in Chemical Mutagens, HollaenderA., ed., vol. 1, pp 235–266, Plenum PressNew York.
15.
MarksP.A., RifkindR.A., ReubenR., BreslowR., TeradaM., CobbW., and BogdenA.E. (1978). Induction of murine erythroleukemia cells to differentiate: A model for the detection of new antitumour drugs.Proc. 10th Int. Congr. Chemother. (in press)
16.
MartinD.G., HankaL.J., and NeilG.L. (1974). A new anti tumour agent (α 4s, 5r)-α - amino-3-chloro-4-hydroxy-4, 5-dihydro-5-isoacid (NSC - 176324): preliminary evaluation against L1210 mouse leukemia in vivo.Cancer Chemother. Rep.58, 935–937
17.
SmithC.G., LummisW.L., and GradyJ.E. (1959). An improved tissue culture assay. I. Methodology & cytotoxicity of antitumour agents.Cancer Res.19, 843–846
18.
UmezawaH. (1978). Enzymic screening methods for microbial products enhancing cancer immunity and therapeutic effect of antitumour agents.Proc. 10th Int. Congr. Chemother. (in press)