LeenaarsMSavenijeBNagtegaalA, et al. Assessing the search for and implementation of the Three Rs: A survey among scientists. Altern Lab Anim2009; 37: 297–303.
2.
CombesRDBallsM. The Three Rs — Opportunities for improving animal welfare and the quality of scientific research. Altern Lab Anim2014; 42: 245–259.
3.
SmithAHawkinsP.Good Science, good Sense and good Sensibilities: The Three Ss of Carol Newton. Animals2016; 6: 70.
COST (European Cooperation in Science and Technology). Homepage, https://www.cost.eu/ (accessed 31 July 2024).
6.
BegleyCGIoannidisJPA. Reproducibility in science. Circ Res2015; 116: 116–126.
7.
SmithAJCluttonRELilleyE, et al.PREPARE: Guidelines for planning animal research and testing. Lab Anim2018; 52: 135–141.
8.
SmithAJLilleyE. The role of the Three Rs in improving the planning and reproducibility of animal experiments. Animals2019; 9: 1–8.
9.
GrahamMLPrescottMJ. The multifactorial role of the 3Rs in shifting the harm–benefit analysis in animal models of disease. Eur J Pharmacol2015; 759: 19–29.
10.
CarboneLAustinJ. Pain and laboratory animals: Publication practices for better data reproducibility and better animal welfare. PLoS One2016; 11: e0155001.
11.
ArchibaldKTsaiounKKennaJG, et al.Better science for safer medicines: The human imperative. J R Soc Med2018; 111: 433–438.
12.
MacArthurClark J. The 3Rs in research: A contemporary approach to replacement, reduction and refinement. Br J Nutr2018; 120: S1–S7.
13.
PamiesDLeistMCoeckeS, et al.Guidance document on Good Cell and Tissue Culture Practice 2.0 (GCCP 2.0). ALTEX2022; 39: 30–70.
14.
European Commission. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. 2019 Report on the statistics on the use of animals for scientific purposes in the Member States of the European Union in 2015–2017. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020.
KitsaraMRevetGVartanian-GrimaldiJ-S, et al.Cyto- and bio-compatibility assessment of plasma-treated polyvinylidene fluoride scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering. Front Bioeng Biotechnol2022; 10: 1008436.
17.
KitsaraMKontziampasisDAgbulutO, et al.Heart on a chip: Micro-nanofabrication and microfluidics steering the future of cardiac tissue engineering. Microelectron Eng2019; 203–204: 44–62.
18.
FiskumVSandvigASandvigI. Silencing of activity during hypoxia improves functional outcomes in motor neuron networks in vitro. Front Integr Neurosci2021; 15: 15:792863.
19.
HanssenKSWinter-HjelmNNiethammerSN, et al.Reverse engineering of feedforward cortical-hippocampal microcircuits for modelling neural network function and dysfunction. bioRxiv2024; 2023.06.26.546556.
20.
NeuhausW. Consensus statement from the European Network of 3R centres (EU3Rnet). ALTEX2021; 138–139.
21.
NeuhausWReininger-GutmannBRinnerB, et al.The current status and work of Three Rs centres and platforms in Europe. Altern Lab Anim2022; 50: 381–413.
22.
MagliaroCAhluwaliaA. Biomedical research on substances of abuse: The Italian case study. Altern Lab Anim2022; 50: 423–436.
23.
PrescottMJLidsterK. Improving quality of science through better animal welfare: The NC3Rs strategy. Lab Anim (NY)2017; 46: 152–156.
24.
NeuhausWReininger-GutmannBRinnerB, et al.The rise of Three Rs centres and platforms in Europe. Altern Lab Anim2022; 50: 90–120.
