Chemical respiratory sensitisation is a serious health problem. However, to date, there are no validated test methods available for identifying respiratory sensitisers. The aim of this study was to develop an in vitro sensitisation test by modifying the human cell line activation test (h-CLAT) to detect respiratory sensitisers and distinguish them from skin sensitisers. THP-1 cells were exposed to the test chemicals (two skin sensitisers and six respiratory sensitisers), either as monocultures or as cocultures with air–liquid interface-cultured reconstructed human bronchial epithelium. The responses were analysed by measuring the expression levels of surface markers on THP-1 cells (CD86, CD54 and OX40L) and the concentrations of cytokines in the culture media (interleukin (IL)-8, IL-33 and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP)). The cocultures exhibited increased CD54 expression on THP-1 cells; moreover, in the cocultures but not in the monocultures, exposure to two uronium salts (i.e. respiratory sensitisers) increased CD54 expression on THP-1 cells to levels above the criteria for a positive h-CLAT result. Additionally, exposure to the respiratory sensitiser abietic acid, significantly increased IL-8 concentration in the culture medium, but only in the cocultures. Although further optimisation of the method is needed to distinguish respiratory from skin sensitisers by using these potential markers (OX40L, IL-33 and TSLP), the coculture of THP-1 cells with bronchial epithelial cells offers a potentially useful approach for the detection of respiratory sensitisers.
KimberIWilksMF. Chemical respiratory allergy. Toxicological and occupational health issues. Hum Exp Toxicol1995; 14: 735–736.
2.
QuirosPLAschbergerK. Identification of Substances of Very High Concern (SVHC) under the ‘equivalent level of concern' route (REACH Article 57(f)) — neurotoxicants and immunotoxicants as examples. EUR 27383 2015. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2015, JRC96572.
3.
ArtsJ. How to assess respiratory sensitization of low molecular weight chemicals?Int J Hyg Environ Health2020; 225: 113469.
4.
OECD. Test No. 429: Skin sensitisation: Local lymph node assay, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2010, 20 pp.
5.
KimberIAgiusRBasketterDA, et al.Chemical respiratory allergy: Opportunities for hazard identification and characterisation. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 60. Altern Lab Anim2007; 35: 243–265.
6.
DearmanRJBasketterDAKimberI. Inter-relationships between different classes of chemical allergens. J Appl Toxicol2013; 33: 558–565.
7.
OECD. Test No. 442C: In chemico skin sensitisation: Assays addressing the Adverse Outcome Pathway key event on covalent binding to proteins, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023, 75 pp.
8.
OECD. Test No. 442E: In vitro skin sensitisation: In vitro skin sensitisation assays addressing the Adverse Outcome Pathway key event on activation of dendritic cells, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4.Paris: OECD Publishing, 2023, 95 pp.
9.
OECD. Test No. 442D: In vitro skin sensitisation: ARE-Nrf2 luciferase test method, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4.Paris: OECD Publishing, 2022, 48 pp.
10.
BasketterDPooleAKimberI. Behaviour of chemical respiratory allergens in novel predictive methods for skin sensitisation. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol2017; 86: 101–106.
11.
ThaELCanavezASchuckDC, et al.Beyond dermal exposure: The respiratory tract as a target organ in hazard assessments of cosmetic ingredients. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol2021; 124: 104976.
12.
LalkoJFKimberIGerberickGF, et al.The direct peptide reactivity assay: Selectivity of chemical respiratory allergens. Toxicol Sci2012; 129: 421–431.
13.
UrbischDMehlingAGuthK, et al.Assessing skin sensitization hazard in mice and men using non-animal test methods. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol2015; 71: 337–351.
14.
OhtakeTMaedaYHayashiT, et al.Applicability of an Integrated Testing Strategy consisting of in silico, in chemico and in vitro assays for evaluating the skin sensitization potencies of isocyanates. Toxicology2018; 393: 9–14.
15.
RovidaCMartinSFVivierM, et al.Advanced tests for skin and respiratory sensitization assessment. ALTEX2013; 30: 231–252.
16.
KrutzNLKimberIRyanCA, et al.Critical evaluation of low-molecular weight respiratory sensitizers and their protein reactivity potential toward lysine residues. Toxicol Sci2021; 182: 346–354.
17.
SmitKSchuurAG. Overview of legislation on sensitisers: With focus on consumer products. Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu RIVM, 2015, 68 pp.
18.
NorthCMEzendamJHotchkissJA, et al.Developing a framework for assessing chemical respiratory sensitization: A workshop report. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol2016; 80: 295–309.
19.
SullivanKMEnochSJEzendamJ, et al.An adverse outcome pathway for sensitization of the respiratory tract by low-molecular-weight chemicals: Building evidence to support the utility of in vitro and in silico methods in a regulatory context. Appl In Vitro Toxicol2017; 3: 213–226.
20.
KimberIPooleABasketterDA. Skin and respiratory chemical allergy: Confluence and divergence in a hybrid adverse outcome pathway. Toxicol Res (Camb)2018; 7: 586–605.
21.
DearmanRJMoussaviAKemenyDM, et al.Contribution of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocyte subsets to the cytokine secretion patterns induced in mice during sensitization to contact and respiratory chemical allergens. Immunology1996; 89: 502–510.
22.
Van OchFMMVan LoverenHDe JongWH, et al.Cytokine production induced by low-molecular-weight chemicals as a function of the stimulation index in a modified local lymph node assay: An approach to discriminate contact sensitizers from respiratory sensitizers. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol2002; 184: 46–56.
23.
KimberIBasketterDAGerberickGF, et al.Chemical allergy: Translating biology into hazard characterization. Toxicol Sci2011; 120(Suppl 1): S238–S268.
24.
BartemesKRKitaH. Dynamic role of epithelium-derived cytokines in asthma. Clin Immunol2012; 143: 222–235.
25.
SamuchiwalSKBoyceJA. Role of lipid mediators and control of lymphocyte responses in type 2 immunopathology. J Allergy Clin Immunol2018; 141: 1182–1190.
26.
GandhiVDVliagoftisH. Airway epithelium interactions with aeroallergens: Role of secreted cytokines and chemokines in innate immunity. Front Immunol2015; 6: 147.
27.
KaurDBrightlingC. OX40/OX40 ligand interactions in T-cell regulation and asthma. Chest2012; 141: 494–499.
28.
AshikagaTYoshidaYHirotaM, et al.Development of an in vitro skin sensitization test using human cell lines: The human Cell Line Activation Test (h-CLAT). I. Optimization of the h-CLAT protocol. Toxicol In Vitro2006; 20: 767–773.
29.
AshikagaTSakaguchiHSonoS, et al.A comparative evaluation of in vitro skin sensitisation tests: The human cell-line activation test (h-CLAT) versus the local lymph node assay (LLNA). Altern Lab Anim2010; 38: 275–284.
30.
GruenertDCFinkbeinerWEWiddicombeJH. Culture and transformation of human airway epithelial cells. Am J Physiol1995; 268: L347–L360.
31.
GrayTEGuzmanKDavisCW, et al.Mucociliary differentiation of serially passaged normal human tracheobronchial epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol1996; 14: 104–112.
32.
BedfordRPerkinsEClementsJ, et al.Recent advancements and application of in vitro models for predicting inhalation toxicity in humans. Toxicol In Vitro2022; 79: 105299.
33.
BierkandtFSLeibrockLWagenerS, et al.The impact of nanomaterial characteristics on inhalation toxicity. Toxicol Res (Camb)2018; 7: 321–346.
34.
EdmondsonRBroglieJJAdcockAF, et al.Three-dimensional cell culture systems and their applications in drug discovery and cell-based biosensors. Assay Drug Dev Technol2014; 12: 207–218.
35.
YingSO'ConnorBRatoffJ, et al.Thymic stromal lymphopoietin expression is increased in asthmatic airways and correlates with expression of Th2-attracting chemokines and disease severity. J Immunol2005; 174: 8183–8190.
36.
MizoguchiIOhashiMChibaY, et al.Prediction of chemical respiratory and contact sensitizers by OX40L expression in dendritic cells using a novel 3D coculture system. Front Immunol2017; 8: 929.
37.
NaritaKOkutomiHSuitH, et al.Behavior of chemical respiratory sensitizers in in vitro methods for skin sensitization. AATEX2021; 26: 9–18.
38.
CharyAHennenJKleinSG, et al.Respiratory sensitization: toxicological point of view on the available assays. Arch Toxicol2018; 92: 803–822.
39.
ArtsJHde JongWHvan TrielJJ, et al.The respiratory local lymph node assay as a tool to study respiratory sensitizers. Toxicol Sci2008; 106: 423–434.
40.
DearmanRJKimberI. Differential stimulation of immune function by respiratory and contact chemical allergens. Immunology1991; 72: 563–570.
41.
SadekarNBoisleveFDekantW, et al.Identifying a reference list of respiratory sensitizers for the evaluation of novel approaches to study respiratory sensitization. Crit Rev Toxicol2021; 51: 792–804.
42.
TarloSMLemiereC. Occupational asthma. N Engl J Med2014; 370: 640–649.
43.
VandenplasOHerengMPHeymansJ, et al.Respiratory and skin hypersensitivity reactions caused by a peptide coupling reagent. Occup Environ Med2008; 65: 715–716.
44.
KeiraTAizawaYKarubeH, et al.Adverse effects of colophony. Ind Health1997; 35: 1–7.
45.
EnochSJRobertsDWCroninMT. Electrophilic reaction chemistry of low molecular weight respiratory sensitizers. Chem Res Toxicol2009; 22: 1447–1453.
46.
GafvertEShaoLPKarlbergAT, et al.Contact allergy to resin acid hydroperoxides. Hapten binding via free radicals and epoxides. Chem Res Toxicol1994; 7: 260–266.
47.
AyarsGHAltmanLCFrazierCE, et al.The toxicity of constituents of cedar and pine woods to pulmonary epithelium. J Allergy Clin Immunol1989; 83: 610–618.
48.
MoriSIshimoriKMatsumuraK, et al.Donor-to-donor variability of a human three-dimensional bronchial epithelial model: A case study of cigarette smoke exposure. Toxicol In Vitro2022; 82: 105391.
49.
CzekalaLSimmsLStevensonM, et al.Toxicological comparison of cigarette smoke and e-cigarette aerosol using a 3D in vitro human respiratory model. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol2019; 103: 314–324.
50.
OgiKLiuSRamezanpourM, et al.Trimellitic anhydride facilitates transepithelial permeability disrupting tight junctions in sinonasal epithelial cells. Toxicol Lett2021; 353: 27–33.
51.
HopkinsJENaisbittDJKitteringhamNR, et al.Selective haptenation of cellular or extracellular protein by chemical allergens: Association with cytokine polarization. Chem Res Toxicol2005; 18: 375–381.
52.
BernsteinJAGhoshDSublettWJ, et al.Is trimellitic anhydride skin testing a sufficient screening tool for selectively identifying TMA-exposed workers with TMA-specific serum IgE antibodies?J Occup Environ Med2011; 53: 1122–1127.
53.
ZeissCWolkonskyPPruzanskyJ, et al.Clinical and immunologic evaluation of trimellitic anhydride workers in multiple industrial settings. J Allergy Clin Immunol1982; 70: 15–18.
54.
BabaETakahashiYLichtenfeldJ, et al.Functional CD4 T cells after intercellular molecular transfer of 0X40 ligand. J Immunol2001; 167: 875–883.
55.
WangYHLiuYJ. OX40-OX40L interactions: A promising therapeutic target for allergic diseases?J Clin Invest2007; 117: 3655–3657.
56.
Committee for Risk Assessment. Opinion on scientific evaluation of occupational exposure limits for nickel and its compounds, ECHA/RAC/A77-O-0000001412-86-189/F. Helsinki: ECHA, 2018, 14 pp.
57.
SaitoKTakenouchiONukadaY, et al.An in vitro skin sensitization assay termed EpiSensA for broad sets of chemicals including lipophilic chemicals and pre/pro-haptens. Toxicol In Vitro2017; 40: 11–25.
58.
CharyASerchiTMoschiniE, et al.An in vitro coculture system for the detection of sensitization following aerosol exposure. ALTEX2019; 36: 403–418.
59.
MizoguchiIKatahiraYInoueS, et al.A novel coculture system for assessing respiratory sensitizing potential by IL-4 in T cells. ALTEX2023; 40: 204–216.
