The Use of Artificial Intelligence for the Fast and Effective Identification of Three Rs-based Literature

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kennedy

. The dark matter of the bibliome. Neuroinformatics 2015; 13: 387–389.

Searls

. Mining the bibliome. Pharmacogenomics J 2001; 1: 88–89.

European Comission . Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Off J Euro Union 2010; L276: 33–77.

European Comission . Regulation (EU) 2019/1010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on the alignment of reporting obligations in the field of legislation related to the environment, and amending Regulations (EC) No 166/2006 and (EU) No 995/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 2002/49/EC, 2004/35/EC, 2007/2/EC, 2009/147/EC and 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Regulations (EC) No 338/97 and (EC) No 2173/2005, and Council Directive 86/278/EEC. Off J Euro Union 2019; L170: 115–127.

Russell

WMS

Burch

. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. London: Methuen, 1959, 238 pp.

van Luijk

Cuijpers

van der Vaart

, et al. Assessing the application of the 3Rs: A survey among animal welfare officers in The Netherlands. Lab Anim 2013; 47: 210–219.

van Luijk

. The next steps towards responsible animal-based research. Nijmegen: SYRCLE, Radboud University, 2017, 195 pp.

Norecopa . About Norecopa, https://norecopa.no/about-norecopa (2016, accessed 6 August 2021).

Utrecht University . 3Rs-Centre, https://www.uu.nl/en/organisation/3rs-centre-uls (undated, accessed 6 August 2021).

10.

Joint Research Centre . Inventory of the 3Rs Knowledge Sources, https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/dataset/jrc-eurl-ecvam-eurl-ecvam-3rs (undated, accessed 6 August 2021).

11.

European Commission . Animals Used for Scientific Purposes, https://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab_animals/3r/key_resources/databases_en.htm (undated, accessed 6 August 2021).

12.

van Luijk

Cuijpers

van der Vaart

, et al. Assessing the search for information on Three Rs methods, and their subsequent implementation: A national survey among scientists in the Netherlands. Altern Lab Anim 2011; 39: 429–447.

13.

de Vries

Whaley

. In Vitro Critical Appraisal Tool (IV-CAT): Tool development protocol (1.0.0). Zenodo 2018, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1493498.

14.

Zhang

Chen

Yang

, et al. BioWordVec, improving biomedical word embeddings with subword information and MeSH. Sci Data 2019; 6: 52.

15.

O'Mara-Eves

Thomas

McNaught

, et al. Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: A systematic review of current approaches. Syst Rev 2015; 4: 5.

16.

Thomas

Noel-Storr

Marshall

, et al. Living systematic reviews: 2. Combining human and machine effort. J Clin Epidemiol 2017; 91: 31–37.

17.

Pistollato

Madia

Corvi

, et al. Current EU regulatory requirements for the assessment of chemicals and cosmetic products: Challenges and opportunities for introducing new approach methodologies. Arch Toxicol 2021; 95: 1867–1897.