FDA. FDA’s predictive toxicology roadmap. Silver Spring, MD: US Food and Drug Administration, 2017, 13 pp.
3.
FDA. Advancing new alternative methodologies at FDA. Silver Spring, MD: US Food and Drug Administration, 2021, 31 pp.
4.
BasketterDAClewellHKimberI, et al.A roadmap for the development of alternative (non-animal) methods for systemic toxicity testing. ALTEX2012; 29: 3–91.
5.
National Research Council; Committee on Toxicity and Assessment of Environmental Agents. Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2007, 216 pp.
BiagioliM. Watch out for cheats in citation game. Nature2016; 535: 201.
12.
VaesenKKatzavJ. How much would each researcher receive if competitive government research funding were distributed equally among researchers. PLoS One2017; 12: e0183967.
SmaldinoPEMcElreathR. The natural selection of bad science. R Soc Open Sci2016; 3: 160384.
15.
IoannidisJP. More time for research: fund people not projects. Nature2011; 477: 529–531.
16.
CharltonBGAndrasP. The future of ‘pure’ medical science: the need for a new specialist professional research system. Med Hypotheses2005; 65: 419–425.
17.
BaileyJBallsM. Clinical impact of high-profile animal-based research reported in the UK national press. BMJ Open Science2020; 4: e100039.
18.
PippinJJCavanaughSEPistollatoF. Animal research for Alzheimer disease: failures of science and ethics. In: HerrmannKJayneK (eds) Animal experimentation: working towards a paradigm change. Boston, MA: Brill, 2019, pp. 480–516.
19.
PistollatoFOhayonELLamA, et al.Alzheimer disease research in the 21st century: past and current failures, new perspectives and funding priorities. Oncotarget2016; 7: 38999–39016.
20.
PediaditakisIKodellaKRManatakisDV, et al.Modeling alpha-synuclein pathology in a human brain-chip to assess blood–brain barrier disruption in Parkinson’s disease. bioRxiv2020; 2020.07.22.207340.
21.
RõlovaTLehtonenŠGoldsteinsG, et al.Metabolic and immune dysfunction of glia in neurodegenerative disorders: focus on iPSC models. Stem Cells2020; 39: 256–265.
22.
BaileyJTaylorK. Non-human primates in neuroscience research: the case against its scientific necessity. Altern Lab Anim2016; 44: 43–69.
23.
CorviRMadiaFGuytonKZ, et al.Moving forward in carcinogenicity assessment: report of an EURL ECVAM/ESTIV workshop. Toxicol In Vitro2017; 45: 278–286.
24.
JacobsMNColacciACorviR, et al.Chemical carcinogen safety testing: OECD expert group international consensus on the development of an integrated approach for the testing and assessment of chemical non-genotoxic carcinogens. Arch Toxicol2020; 94: 2899–2923.
25.
BaileyJBallsM. Recent efforts to elucidate the scientific validity of animal-based drug tests by the pharmaceutical industry, pro-testing lobby groups, and animal welfare organisations. BMC Med Ethics2019; 20: 16.
26.
GoyalNABerryJDWindebankA, et al.Addressing heterogeneity in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis clinical trials. Muscle Nerve2020; 62: 156–166.
BaileyJ. An assessment of the role of chimpanzees in AIDS vaccine research. Altern Lab Anim2008; 36: 381–428.
29.
BaileyJ. Translatability of NHP research and testing to the development of HIV/AIDS vaccines. Sci Rep2021[In press].
30.
SeokJWarrenHSCuencaAG, et al.Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA2013; 110: 3507–3512.
31.
StevensML. Medical philanthropy pays dividends: the impact of philanthropic funding of basic and clinical research goes beyond mere finances by reshaping the whole research enterprise. EMBO Rep2019; 20: e48173.
32.
SchekmanRRileyEA. Coordinating a new approach to basic research into Parkinson’s disease. Elife2019; 8: e51167.