BerggrenE., AmcoffP., BenigniR., BlackburnK., CarneyE., CroninM., DeluykerH., GautierF., JudsonR.S., KassG.E.N., KellerD., KnightD., LilienblumW., MahonyC., RusynI., SchultzT., SchwarzM., SchüürmannG., WhiteA., BurtonJ., LostiaA.M., MunnS. & WorthA. (2015). Chemical safety assessment using read-across: Assessing the use of novel testing methods to strengthen the evidence base for decision making. Environmental Health Perspectives, E-pub ahead of print [doi: 10.1289/ ehp.1409342].
4.
WorthA., BarrosoJ., BremerS., BurtonJ., CasatiS., CoeckeS., CorviR., DesprezB., DumontC., GouliarmouV., GoumenouM., GräpelR., GriesingerC., HalderM., Janusch RoiA., KienzlerA., MadiaF., MunnS., NepelskaM., PainiA., PriceA., PrietoP., RolakiA., SchäfferM., TriebeJ., WhelanM., WittwehrC. & ZuangV. (2014). Alternative Methods for Regulatory Toxicology – A State-of-the-art review. Report EUR 26797 EN, 461pp. Ispra, Italy: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Health and Consumer Protection. Available at: http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13634/echa_jrc_sla_report_en.pdf (Accessed 11.11.15).
5.
CroninM.T., MaddenJ., EnochS.J., & RobertsD.W. (2013). Chemical Toxicity Prediction: Category Formation and Read-across, 191pp. London, UK: Royal Society of Chemistry.
Anon. (2007). Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Official Journal of the European Union L136, 29.05.2007, 3-280.
9.
ECHA (2014). The Use of Alternatives to Testing on Animals for the REACH Regulation: Second Report under Article 117(3) of the REACH Regulation [ECHA-14-A-07-EN], 131pp. Helsinki, Finland: European Chemicals Agency. Available at: http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13639/alternatives_test_animals_2014_en.pdf (Accessed 11.11.15).
10.
BallN., BartelsM., BudinskyR., KlapaczJ., HaysS., KirmanC. & PatlewiczG. (2014). The challenge of using read-across within the EU REACH regulatory framework; how much uncertainty is too much? Dipropylene glycol methyl ether acetate, an exemplary case study. Regulatory Toxicolology & Pharmacology68, 212-221.
11.
SchultzT.W., AmcoffP., BerggrenE., GautierF., KlaricM., KnightD.J., MahonyC., SchwarzM., WhiteA. & CroninM.T.D. (2015). A strategy for structuring and reporting a read-across prediction of toxicity. Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology72, 586-601.
12.
van RavenzwaayB., HeroldM., KampH., KappM.D., FabianE., LooserR., KrennrichG., MellertW., ProkoudineA., StraussV., WalkT. & WiemerJ. (2012). Metabolomics: A tool for early detection of toxicological effects and an opportunity for biology based grouping of chemicals – from QSAR to QBAR. Mutation Research746, 144-150.
13.
HagenM., PabelU., LandsiedelR., BartschI., FalanyC.N., & GlattH. (1998). Expression of human estrogen sulfotransferase in Salmonella typhimurium: Differences between hHST and hEST in the enantioselective activation of 1-hydroxyethylpyrene to a mutagen. Chemico-Biological Interactions109, 249-253.
RobertsD.W., AptulaA.O., PatlewiczG., & PeaseC. (2008). Chemical reactivity indices and mechanism-based read-across for non-animal based assessment of skin sensitisation potential. Journal of Applied Toxicology28, 443-454.
16.
TeubnerW., MehlingA., SchusterP.X., GuthK., WorthA., BurtonJ., van RavenzwaayB. & LandsiedelR. (2013). Computer models versus reality: How well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance. Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology67, 468-485.
17.
UrbischD., MehlingA., GuthK., RamirezT., HonarvarN., KolleS., LandsiedelR., JaworskaJ., KernP.S., GerberickF., NatschA., EmterR., AshikagaT., MiyazawaM. & SakaguchiH. (2015). Assessing skin sensitization hazard in mice and men using non-animal test methods. Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology71, 337-351.
18.
HendrenC.O., LowryG.V., UnrineJ.M., & WiesnerM.R. (2015). A functional assay-based strategy for nanomaterial risk forecasting. Science of the Total Environment536, 1029-1037.
19.
ArtsJ.H., HadiM., IrfanM.A., KeeneA.M., KreilingR., LyonD., MaierM., MichelK., PetryT., SauerU.G., WarheitD., WienchK., WohllebenW. & LandsiedelR. (2015). A decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping). Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology71, Suppl. 2, S1-S27.
20.
OomenA.G., BosP.M., FernandesT.F., Hund-RinkeK., BoraschiD., ByrneH.J., AschbergerK., GottardoS., von der KammerF., KühnelD., HristozovD., MarcominiA., MiglioreL., Scott-FordsmandJ., WickP. & Land siedelR. (2014). Concern-driven integrated approaches to nanomaterial testing and assessment – Report of the NanoSafety Cluster Working Group 10. Nanotoxicology8, 334–348.
PatlewiczG., BallN., BeckerR.A., BoothE.D., CroninM.T., KroeseD., SteupD., van RavenzwaayB. & HartungT. (2014). Food for Thought: Read-across approaches – misconceptions, promises and challenges ahead. ALTEX31, 387-396.
25.
PatlewiczG., BallN., BoogaardP.J., BeckerR.A. & HubeschB. (2015). Building scientific confidence in the development and evaluation of read-across. Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology72, 117-133.
OECD (2014). Series on Testing and Assessment No. 194: Guidance on Grouping of Chemicals, 2nd edition, ENV/JM/MONO(2014)4, 141pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation & Development.
29.
ECHA (undated). Registered substances. Helsinki, Finland: European Chemicals Agency. Available at: http://echa. europa.eu/information-on-chemicals/registered-substances (Accessed 12.11.15).
30.
SEURAT (undated). Welcome to the SEURAT-1 website. Available at: http://www.seurat-1.eu/ (Accessed 11.11. 15).