This paper provides a critical review of recently published work that suggests that the precision of hazardous concentration estimates from Species Sensitivity Distributions (SSDs) is improved when the uncertainty in the input data is taken into account. Our review confirms that this counter-intuitive result is indeed incorrect.
AldenbergT. & RorijeE. (2013). Species sensitivity distribution estimation from uncertain (QSAR-based) effects data. ATLA41, 19–31.
2.
FoxD.R. (2010). A Bayesian approach for determining the no effect concentration and hazardous concentration in ecotoxicology. Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety73, 123–131.
3.
FoxD.R. & BurgmanM.A. (2008). Ecological risk assessment. In Encyclopedia of Quantitative Risk Assessment and Analysis (ed. MelnickE. & EverittB.), pp. 1600–1603. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
4.
BayarriM.J. & BergerJ.O. (2004). The interplay of Bayesian and Frequentist analysis. Statistical Science19, 58–80.
5.
MeekG., CeyhunO. & DunningK.A. (2007). Small F-ratios: Red flags in the linear model. Journal of Data Science5, 199–215.
6.
MeekG. & TurnerS. (1983). Statistical Analysis for Business Decisions, 783pp. Boston, MA, USA: Houghton Mifflin.
GuentherW.C. (1972). Tolerance intervals for univariate distributions. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly19, 309–333.
9.
GuentherW.C., PatilS.A. & UppuluriV.R.R. (1976). One-sided β-content tolerance factors for the two-parameter exponential distribution. Technometrics18, 333–340.
10.
KrishnamoorthyK. (2009). Statistical Tolerance Regions: Theory, Applications, and Computation, 512pp. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
11.
AldenbergT. (2014). HC5 estimation in SSDs revisited. Workshop Programme: Estimating toxicity thresholds for aquatic ecological communities from sensitivity distributions. 11–13 February 2014, Amsterdam. European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals.
