The EpiOcular™ Eye Irritation Test is the Method of Choice for the In Vitro Eye Irritation Testing of Agrochemical Formulations: Correlation Analysis of EpiOcular Eye Irritation Test and BCOP Test Data According to the UN GHS,US EPA and Brazil ANVISA Classification Schemes

Abstract

The Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) test is commonly used for the identification of severe ocular irritants (GHS Category 1), but it is not recommended for the identification of ocular irritants (GHS Category 2). The incorporation of human reconstructed tissue model-based tests into a tiered test strategy to identify ocular non-irritants and replace the Draize rabbit eye irritation test has been suggested (OECD TG 405). The value of the EpiOcular™ Eye Irritation Test (EIT) for the prediction of ocular non-irritants (GHS No Category) has been demonstrated, and an OECD Test Guideline (TG) was drafted in 2014. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the BCOP test, in conjunction with corneal histopathology (as suggested for the evaluation of the depth of the injury) and/or the EpiOcular-EIT, could be used to predict the eye irritation potential of agrochemical formulations according to the UN GHS, US EPA and Brazil ANVISA classification schemes. We have assessed opacity, permeability and histopathology in the BCOP assay, and relative tissue viability in the EpiOcular-EIT, for 97 agrochemical formulations with available in vivo eye irritation data. By using the OECD TG 437 protocol for liquids, the BCOP test did not result in sufficient correct predictions of severe ocular irritants for any of the three classification schemes. The lack of sensitivity could be improved somewhat by the inclusion of corneal histopathology, but the relative viability in the EpiOcular-EIT clearly outperformed the BCOP test for all three classification schemes. The predictive capacity of the EpiOcular-EIT for ocular non-irritants (UN GHS No Category) for the 97 agrochemical formulations tested (91% sensitivity, 72% specificity and 82% accuracy for UN GHS classification) was comparable to that obtained in the formal validation exercise underlying the OECD draft TG. We therefore conclude that the EpiOcular-EIT is currently the best in vitro method for the prediction of the eye irritation potential of liquid agrochemical formulations.

Keywords

agrochemical formulations BCOP Draize test EIT EpiOcular eye irritation in vitro testing

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

OECD (2002). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, No. 405: Acute Eye Irritation/Corrosion, 14pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Curren

R.D.

& Harbell

J.W.

(2002). Ocular safety: A silent (in vitro) success story. ATLA 30, Suppl. 2, 69–74.

OECD (2013). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Test No. 437: Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage, 27pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

OECD (2013). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Test No. 438: Isolated Chicken Eye Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage, 20pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

OECD (2014). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Draft Proposal for a New Test Guideline: Reconstructed Human Cornea-like Epithelium (RhCE) Test Method for Identifying Chemicals Not Requiring Classification and Labelling for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage, 25pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

UN (2011). Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS): Fourth Revised Edition. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.

Kolle

S.N.

, Kandárová

, Wareing

, van Ravenzwaay

& Landsiedel

(2011). In-house validation of the EpiOcular™ eye irritation test and its combination with the bovine corneal opacity and permeability test for the assessment of ocular irritation. ATLA 39, 365–387.

Schrage

, Kolle

S.N.

, Moreno

M.C.

, Norman

, Raabe

, Curren

, van Ravenzwaay

& Landsiedel

(2011). The bovine corneal opacity and permeability test in routine ocular irritation testing and its improvement within the limits of OECD test guideline 437. ATLA 39, 37–53.

Prinsen

M.K.

(1996). The chicken enucleated eye test (CEET): A practical (pre)screen for the assessment of eye irritation/corrosion potential of test materials. Food & Chemical Toxicology 34, 291–296.

10.

ICCVAM (2006). ICCVAM Test Method Evaluation Report: In Vitro Test Methods for Detecting Ocular Corrosives and Severe Irritants, 484pp. Bethesda, MA, USA: National Institutes of Health.

11.

Schrage

, Gamer

A.O.

, van Ravenzwaay

& Landsiedel

(2010). Experience with the HET-CAM method in the routine testing of a broad variety of chemicals and formulations. ATLA 38, 39–52.

12.

UN (2013). Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) Fifth Revised Edition. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.

13.

EPA (1996). Label Review Manual 2nd Edition, 168pp. Washington, DC, USA: Environmental Protection Agency.

14.

Anon. (1992). Portaria N° 03/MS/SNVS, de 16 de Janeiro de 1992. Brasília, DF, Brazil: Imprensa Nacional.

15.

OECD (2008). OECD Guidance for Country Data Review Reports on Plant Protection Products and their Active Substances (OECD Monograph Guidance), 32pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

16.

Draize

J.H.

, Woodard

& Calvery

H.O.

(1944). Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. Journal of Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics 82, 377–390.

17.

Gautheron

, Dukic

, Alix

& Sina

J.F.

(1992). Bovine corneal opacity and permeability test: An in vitro assay of ocular irritancy. Fundamental & Applied Toxicology 18, 442–449.

18.

OECD (2011). Series on Testing and Assessment No. 160: Guidance Document on the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) and Isolated Chicken Eye (ICE) Test Methods: Collection of Tissues for Histological Evaluation and Collection of Data on Non-Severe Irritants, 63pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

19.

Jester

J.V.

, Petroll

W.M.

, Bean

, Parker

R.D.

, Carr

G.J.

, Cavanagh

H.D.

& Maurer

J.K.

(1998). Area and depth of surfactant-induced corneal injury predicts extent of subsequent ocular responses. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 39, 2610–2625.

20.

Jester

J.V.

(2006). Extent of corneal injury as a biomarker for hazard assessment and the development of alternative models to the Draize rabbit eye test. Cutaneous & Ocular Toxicology 25, 41–54.

21.

Maurer

J.K.

, Parker

R.D.

& Jester

J.V.

(2002). Extent of initial corneal injury as the mechanistic basis for ocular irritation: Key findings and recommendations for the development of alternative assays. Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology 36, 106–117.

22.

Kaluzhny

, Kandárová

, Hayden

, Kubilus

, d'Argembeau-Thornton

& Klausner

(2011). Development of the EpiOcular™ eye irritation test for hazard identification and labelling of eye irritating chemicals in response to the requirements of the EU cosmetics directive and REACH legislation. ATLA 39, 339–364.

23.

Adriaens

, Barroso

, Eskes

, Hoffmann

, McNamee

, Alepee

, Bessou-Touya

, De Smedt

, De Wever

, Pfannenbecker

, Tailhardat

& Zuang

(2014). Retrospective analysis of the Draize test for serious eye damage/eye irritation: Importance of understanding the in vivo endpoints under UN GHS/EU CLP for the development and evaluation of in vitro test methods. Archives of Toxicology 88, 701–723.

24.

Scott

, Eskes

, Hoffmann

, Adriaens

, Alepee

, Bufo

, Clothier

, Facchini

, Faller

, Guest

, Harbell

, Hartung

, Kamp

, Varlet

B.L.

, Meloni

, McNamee

, Osborne

, Pape

, Pfannenbecker

, Prinsen

, Seaman

, Spielmann

, Stokes

, Trouba

, Berghe

C.V.

, Goethem

F.V.

, Vassallo

, Vinardell

& Zuang

(2010). A proposed eye irritation testing strategy to reduce and replace in vivo studies using Bottom-Up and Top-Down approaches. Toxicology in Vitro 24, 1–9.

25.

EPA (2013). Use of an Alternate Testing Framwork for Classification of Eye Irritation Potential of EPA Pesticide Products, 39pp. Washington, DC, USA: Environmental Protection Agency.