AshtonR., De WeverB., FuchsH.W., GaçaM., HillE., KrulC., PothA. & RoggenE.L. (2014). State of the art on alternative methods to animal testing from an industrial point of view: Ready for regulation?ALTEX31, 357–363.
5.
PoundP., EbrahimS., SandercockP., BrackenM.B. & RobertsI. (2004). Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans?British Medical Journal328, 514–517.
6.
KasteM. (2005). Use of animal models has not contributed to development of acute stroke therapies: Pro. Stroke36, 2323–2324.
7.
PippinJ.J. (2005). The Need for Revision of PreMarket Testing: The Failure of Animal Tests of COX-2 Inhibitors, 23pp. Washington, DC, USA: The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine. Available at: pcrm.org/pdfs/research/testing/exp/COX2Report.pdf (Accessed 04.11.14).
8.
HackamD.G. & RedelmeierD.A. (2006). Translation of research evidence from animals to humans. Journal of the American Medical Association296, 1731–1732.
9.
KnightA. (2008). Systematic reviews of animal experiments demonstrate poor contributions towards human healthcare. Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials3, 89–96.
10.
MatthewsR.A.J. (2008). Medical progress depends on animal models – doesn't it?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine101, 95–98.
11.
SeokJ., WarrenH.S., CuencaA.G., MindrinosM.N., BakerH.V., XuW., RichardsD.R., McDonald-SmithG.P., GaoH., HennessyL., FinnertyC.C., LópezC.M., HonariS., MooreE.E., MineiJ.P., CuschieriJ., BankeyP.E., JohnsonJ.L., SperryJ., NathensA.B., BilliarT.R., WestM.A., JeschkeM.G., KleinM.B., GamelliR.L., GibranN.S., BrownsteinB.H., Miller-GrazianoC., CalvanoS.E., MasonP.H., CobbJ.P., RahmeL.G., LowryS.F., MaierR.V., MoldawerL.L., HerndonD.N., DavisR.W., XiaoW., TompkinsR.G. & Inflammation and Host Response to Injury, Large Scale Collaborative Research Program (2013). Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA110, 3507–3512.
12.
LiA.P. (2004). Accurate prediction of human drug toxicity: A major challenge in drug development. Chemico-biological Interactions150, 3–7.
13.
ArnardottirA.H., Haaijer-RuskampF.M., StrausS.M., EichlerH.G., de GraeffP.A. & MolP.G. (2011). Additional safety risk to exceptionally approved drugs in Europe?British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology72, 490–499.
14.
van MeerP.J., KooijmanM., Gispen-de WiedC.C., MoorsE.H. & SchellekensH. (2012). The ability of animal studies to detect serious post marketing adverse events is limited. Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology64, 345–349.
FourchesD., BarnesJ.C., DayN.C., BradleyP., ReedJ.Z. & TropshaA. (2010). Cheminformatics analysis of assertions mined from literature that describe drug-induced liver injury in different species. Chemical Research in Toxicology23, 171–183.
17.
BaileyJ., ThewM. & BallsM. (2013). An analysis of the use of dogs in predicting human toxicology and drug safety. ATLA41, 335–350.
18.
BaileyJ., ThewM. & BallsM. (2014). An analysis of the use of animal models in predicting human toxicology and drug safety. ATLA42, 181–199.
19.
AltmanD.G. & BlandJ.M. (1994). Diagnostic tests 2: Predictive values. British Medical Journal309, 102.
20.
BrookerP. (2014). The use of second species in toxicology testing. ATLA42, 147–149.
21.
BaileyJ. (2014). A response to the ABPI's Letter to the Editor on the use of dogs in predicting drug toxicity in humans. ATLA42, 149–153.