Countries that have discontinued routine mouse bioassay testing might gain a market advantage in domestic and export seafood products over countries that continue to use the mouse test
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
StewartI. & McLeodC. (2014). The laboratory mouse in routine food safety testing for marine algal biotoxins and harmful algal bloom toxin research: Past, present and future. Journal of AOAC International97, 356–372.
2.
AOAC International (2012). Method 2005.06 In Official Methods of Analysis. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International. Available at: http://www.eoma.aoac.org/ (Accessed 25.10.14).
3.
AOAC International (2012). Method 2011.02 In Official Methods of Analysis. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International. Available at: http://www.eoma.aoac.org/ (Accessed 25.10.14).
4.
EU-RL-MB & AESAN (2011). EU-Harmonised Standard Operating Procedure for Determination of Lipophilic Marine Biotoxins in Molluscs by LC-MS/MS, 31 pp. Vigo, Spain: European Union Reference Laboratory for Marine Biotoxins & Agencia Española de Seguridad Alimentaria y Nutrición.
5.
AOAC International (2012). Method 2011.27 In Official Methods of Analysis. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International. Available at: http://www.eoma.aoac.org/ (Accessed 25.10.14).
6.
Codex Alimentarius Commission (2014). Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme: Codex Alimentarius Commission. Report of the Thirty-third Session of the Codex Committee on Fish and Fishery Products, Bergen, Norway, 17–21 February 2014, vi + 64 pp. Rome, Italy: Codex Alimentarius Commission.
7.
Codex Alimentarius Commission (2014). Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme: Codex Committee on Fish and Fishery Products, 32nd Session, Bali, Indonesia, 8 pp. Rome, Italy: Codex Alimentarius Commission.
8.
DosmanD.M., AdamowiczW.L. & HrudeyS.E. (2001). Socioeconomic determinants of health- and food safety-related risk perceptions. Risk Analysis21, 307–317.
