The aim of the CADASTER project (CAse Studies on the Development and Application of in SilicoTechniques for Environmental Hazard and Risk Assessment) was to exemplify REACH-related hazard assessments for four classes of chemical compound, namely, polybrominated diphenylethers, per and polyfluorinated compounds, (benzo)triazoles, and musks and fragrances. The QSPR-THESAURUS website (http://qspr-thesaurus.eu) was established as the project's online platform to upload, store, apply, and also create, models within the project. We overview the main features of the website, such as model upload, experimental design and hazard assessment to support risk assessment, and integration with other web tools, all of which are essential parts of the QSPR-THESAURUS.
European Parliament (2006). Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Official Journal of the European Union L396, 30.12.2006, 1–849.
2.
PeijnenburgW. & TetkoI.V. (2013). Exemplification of the implementation of alternatives to experimental testing in chemical risk assessment — case studies from within the CADASTER project. ATLA41, 13–17.
3.
CADASTER (undated). QSPR-THESAURUS Online Platform. Available at: http://qspr-thesaurus.eu/ (Accessed 04.01.14).
4.
SushkoI., NovotarskyiS., KörnerR., PandeyA.K., RuppM., TeetzW., BrandmaierS., AbdelazizA., ProkopenkoV.V., TanchukV.Y., TodeschiniR., VarnekA., MarcouG., ErtlP., PotemkinV., GrishinaM., GasteigerJ., SchwabC., BaskinI.I., PalyulinV.A., RadchenkoE.V., WelshW.J., KholodovychV., ChekmarevD., CherkasovA., Aires-de-SousaJ., ZhangQ.Y., BenderA., NigschF., PatinyL., WilliamsA., TkachenkoV. & TetkoI.V. (2011). Online Chemical Modeling Environment (OCHEM): Web platform for data storage, model development and publishing of chemical information. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design25, 533–554.
5.
AldenbergT. & RorijeE. (2013). Species sensitivity distribution estimation from uncertain (QSAR-based) effects data. ATLA41, 19–31.
6.
BrandmaierS., SahlinU., TetkoI.V. & ÖbergT. (2012). PLS-Optimal: A stepwise D-optimal design based on latent variables. Journal of Chemical Information & Modeling52, 975–983.
7.
BrandmaierS., TetkoI.V. & ÖbergT. (2012). An evaluation of experimental design in QSAR modelling utilizing the K-medoid clustering. Journal of Chemometrics26, 509–517.
8.
BrandmaierS. & TetkoI.V. (2013). Robustness in experimental design: A study on the reliability of selection approaches. Computational & Structural Biotechnology Journal7.
CADASTER (undated). Tutorial on Model Upload to QSPR-THESAURUS Web Using JRC Models. Available at: http://www.cadaster.eu/node/118 (Accessed 05.01.14).
11.
JRC (undated). (Q)SAR Model Reporting Format Inventory. Available at: http://qsardb.jrc.it/qmrf/ (Accessed 05.01.14).
SushkoI., NovotarskyiS., KörnerR., PandeyA.K., KovalishynV.V., ProkopenkoV.V. & TetkoI.V. (2010). Applicability domain for in silico models to achieve accuracy of experimental measurements. Journal of Chemometrics24, 202-208.
14.
TetkoI.V., SushkoI., PandeyA.K., ZhuH., TropshaA., PapaE., ObergT., TodeschiniR., FourchesD. & VarnekA. (2008). Critical assessment of QSAR models of environmental toxicity against Tetrahymena pyriformis: Focusing on applicability domain and overfitting by variable selection. Journal of Chemical Information & Modeling48, 1733-1746.
15.
TetkoI.V., BruneauP., MewesH-W., RohrerD.C. & PodaG.I. (2006). Can we estimate the accuracy of ADME-Tox predictions?Drug Discovery Today11, 700-707.
16.
RoyP.P., KovarichS. & GramaticaP. (2011). QSAR model reproducibility and applicability: A case study of rate constants of hydroxyl radical reaction models applied to polybrominated diphenyl ethers and (benzo-)triazoles. Journal of Computational Chemistry32, 2386-2396.
17.
SushkoI., NovotarskyiS., KörnerR., PandeyA.K., CherkasovA., LiJ., GramaticaP., HansenK., SchroeterT., MüllerK-R., XiL., LiuH., YaoX., ÖbergT., HormozdiariF., DaoP., SahinalpC., TodeschiniR., PolishchukP., ArtemenkoA., Kuz'minV., MartinT.M., YoungD.M., FourchesD., MuratovE., TropshaA., BaskinI., HorvathD., MarcouG., MullerC., VarnekA., ProkopenkoV.V. & TetkoI.V. (2010). Applicability domains for classification problems: Benchmarking of distance to models for Ames mutagenicity set. Journal of Chemical Information & Modeling50, 2094-2111.
18.
GramaticaP., CassaniS., RoyP.P., KovarichS., YapC.W. & PapaE. (2012). QSAR modeling is not ‘push a button and find a correlation': A case study of toxicity of (benzo-)triazoles on algae. Molecular Informatics31, 817–835.
19.
OECD (2004). OECD Principles for the Validation, for Regulatory Purposes, of (Quantitative) Structure–Activity Relationship Models, 2pp. Paris, France: 37th Joint Meeting of the Chemicals Committee and Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/37/37849783.pdf (Accessed 05.01.14).
PosthumaL., TraasT.P. & SuterG.W.I. (2002). Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology, 616pp. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Lewis Publishers.
24.
AldenbergT. & SlobW. (1993). Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data. Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety25, 48–63.
25.
SahlinU. (2013). Uncertainty in QSAR predictions. ATLA41, 111–125.
26.
SahlinU., GolsteijnL., IqbalM.S. & PeijnenburgW. (2013). Arguments for considering QSAR uncertainty in hazard and risk assessments. ATLA41, 91–110.
27.
AldenbergT. & JaworskaJ.S. (2000). Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions. Ecotoxicology & Environmental Safety46, 1–18.
28.
TetkoI.V., SopasakisP., KunwarP., BrandmaierS., NovotarskyiS., CharochkinaL., ProkopenkoV. & PeijnenburgW.J.G.M. (2013). Prioritisation of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) by using the QSPR-THESAURUS web tool. ATLA41, 127–135.
29.
CassaniS., KovarichS., PapaE., RoyP.P., RahmbergM., NilssonS., SahlinU., JeliazkovaN., KochevN., PukalovO., TetkoI., BrandmaierS., DurjavaM.K., KolarB., PeijnenburgW. & GramaticaP. (2013). Evaluation of CADASTER QSAR models for the aquatic toxicity of (benzo)triazoles and prioritisation by consensus prediction. ATLA41, 49–64.
30.
CassaniS., KovarichS., PapaE., RoyP.P., van der WalL. & GramaticaP. (2013). Daphnia and fish toxicity of (benzo)triazoles: Validated QSAR models, and interspecies Quantitative Activity–Activity modelling. Journal of Hazardous Materials258–259, 50–60.
31.
Den HollanderH., Van EijkerenJ. & Van de MeentD. (2004). SimpleBox 3.0: Multimedia Mass Balance Model for Evaluating the Fate of Chemicals in the Environment. Report No. 601200003, 155pp. Bilthoven, The Netherlands: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM).
DingG-H., FrömelT., van den BrandhofE-J., BaerselmanR. & PeijnenburgW.J.G.M. (2012). Acute toxicity of poly- and perfluorinated compounds to two cladocerans, Daphnia magna and Chydorus sphaericus. Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry31, 605–610.
36.
DingG., WouterseM., BaerselmanR. & PeijnenburgW.J.G.M. (2012). Toxicity of polyfluorinated and perfluorinated compounds to lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and green algae (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata). Archives of Environmental Contamination & Toxicology62, 49–55.
37.
DingG. & PeijnenburgW.J.G.M. (2013). Physico-chemical properties and aquatic toxicity of poly- and perfluorinated compounds. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science & Technology43, 598–678.
38.
MansouriK., ConsonniV., DurjavaM.K., KolarB., ÖbergT. & TodeschiniR. (2012). Assessing bioaccumulation of polybrominated diphenyl ethers for aquatic species by QSAR modeling. Chemosphere89, 433–444.
39.
DurjavaM.K., KolarB., ArnusL., PapaE., KovarichS., SahlinU. & PeijnenburgW. (2013). Experimental assessment of the environmental fate and effects of triazoles and benzotriazole. ATLA41, 65–75.
BhhataraiB. & GramaticaP. (2010). Per- and polyfluoro toxicity (LC50 inhalation) study in rat and mouse using QSAR modeling. Chemical Research in Toxicology23, 528–539.
42.
BhhataraiB., TeetzW., LiuT., ÖbergT., JeliazkovaN., KochevN., PukalovO., TetkoI.V., KovarichS., PapaE. & GramaticaP. (2011). CADASTER QSPR models for predictions of melting and boiling points of perfluorinated chemicals. Molecular Informatics30, 189–204.
43.
BhhataraiB. & GramaticaP. (2011). Prediction of aqueous solubility, vapor pressure and critical micelle concentration for aquatic partitioning of perfluorinated chemicals. Environmental Science & Technology45, 8120–8128.
44.
BhhataraiB. & GramaticaP. (2011). Modelling physico-chemical properties of (benzo)triazoles, and screening for environmental partitioning. Water Research45, 1463–1471.
45.
BhhataraiB. & GramaticaP. (2011). Oral LD50 toxicity modeling and prediction of per- and polyfluorinated chemicals on rat and mouse. Molecular Diversity15, 467–476.
46.
PapaE., KovarichS. & GramaticaP. (2009). Development, validation and inspection of the applicability domain of QSPR models for physico-chemical properties of polybrominated diphenyl ethers. QSAR & Combinatorial Science28, 790–796.
47.
PapaE., KovarichS. & GramaticaP. (2011). On the use of local and global QSPRs for the prediction of physico-chemical properties of polybrominated diphenyl ethers. Molecular Informatics30, 232–240.
48.
ÖbergT. & LiuT. (2011). Extension of a prediction model to estimate vapor pressures of perfluorinated compounds (PFCs). Chemometrics & Intelligent Laboratory Systems107, 59–64.
49.
PapaE., KovarichS. & GramaticaP. (2010). QSAR modeling and prediction of the endocrine-disrupting potencies of brominated flame retardants. Chemical Research in Toxicology23, 946–954.
50.
KovarichS., PapaE. & GramaticaP. (2011). QSAR classification models for the prediction of endocrine disrupting activity of brominated flame retardants. Journal of Hazardous Materials190, 106–112.
51.
KovarichS., PapaE., LiJ. & GramaticaP. (2012). QSAR classification models for the screening of the endocrine-disrupting activity of perfluorinated compounds. SAR & QSAR in Environmental Research23, 207–220.
52.
PapaE., LuiniM. & GramaticaP. (2009). Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship modelling of oral acute toxicity and cytotoxic activity of fragrance materials in rodents. SAR & QSAR in Environmental Research20, 767–779.
53.
PapaE., KovarichS. & GramaticaP. (2013). QSAR prediction of the competitive interaction of emerging halogenated pollutants with human transthyretin. SAR & QSAR in Environmental Research24, 333–349.
54.
ChiricoN. & GramaticaP. (2011). Real external predictivity of QSAR models: How to evaluate it? Comparison of different validation criteria and proposal of using the concordance correlation coefficient. Journal of Chemical Information & Modeling51, 2320–2335.
55.
ChiricoN. & GramaticaP. (2012). Real external predictivity of QSAR models. Part 2. New intercomparable thresholds for different validation criteria and the need for scatter plot inspection. Journal of Chemical Information & Modeling52, 2044–2058.
AndersonD.P. (2004). BOINC: A System for Public-resource Computing and Storage. Proceedings Fifth IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Grid Computing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, pp. 4–10.
59.
StewartJ.J.P. (1990). MOPAC: A semiempirical molecular orbital program. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design4, 1–103.
60.
BrandmaierS., NovotarskyiS., SushkoY. & TetkoI.V. (2013). From descriptors to predicted properties: Experimental design by using applicability domain estimation. ATLA41, 33–47.
61.
BirnbaumL. & StaskalD. (2004). Brominated flame retardants: Cause for concern?Environmental Health Perspectives112, 9–17.
62.
TetkoI. (2012). The perspectives of computational chemistry modeling. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design26, 135–136.
