By considering reduction before refinement, we risk allowing some animals to experience greater pain and distress. A variety of approaches can help balance reduction and refinement while promoting the welfare of individual animals
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RussellW.M.S., & BurchR.L. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, 238 pp. London, UK: Methuen.
2.
OlssonI.A.S., FrancoN.H., WearyD.M., & SandøeP. (2012). The 3Rs principle — mind the ethical gap. ALTEX Proceedings1/12, 333–336.
3.
HansenA.K., SandøeP., SvendsenO., ForsmanB., & ThomsenP. (1999). The need to refine the notion of reduction. In Humane Endpoint in Animal Experiments for Biomedical Research, pp. 139–144. London, UK: Laboratory Animals Ltd. Available at: http://www.lal.org.uk/publications/this-is-a-test-subject/humane-endpoints/ (Accessed 15.05.13).
4.
De BooM.J., RennieA.E., Buchanan-SmithH.M., & HendriksenC.F.M. (2005). The interplay between replacement, reduction and refinement: Considerations where the Three Rs interact. Animal Welfare14, 327–332.
5.
OlssonI.A.S., RobinsonP., & SandøeP. (2010). Ethics of animal research. In Handbook of Laboratory Science, Vol. 1, Third Edition: Essential Principles and Practices (ed. HauJ., & SchapiroS.J.), pp. 21–38. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
6.
HMSO (1986). Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. 1986 Chapter 14: An Act to make new provision for the protection of animals used for experimental or other scientific purposes [20th May 1986].London, UK: Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/14 (Accessed 16.07.13).
7.
RoseM., EverittJ., HedrichH., SchofieldJ., DennisM., ScottE., & GriffinG. (2013). ICLAS Working Group on Harmonisation: International guidance concerning the production care and use of genetically-altered animals. Laboratory Animals47, 146–152.
8.
USDA (2011). Policy #14: Major Survival Surgery Dealers Selling Surgically-Altered Animals to Research. Animal Care Resources Guide.Washington, DC, USA: United States Department of Agriculture. Available at: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/animal_welfare/policy.php?policy=14 (Accessed 06.06.13).
9.
SchuppliC.A., & FraserD. (2005). The interpretation and application of the Three Rs by animal ethics committee members. ATLA33, 487–500.
10.
BallsM., GoldbergA.M., FentemJ.H., BroadheadC.L., BurchR.L., FestingM.F.W., & van ZutphenB.F.M. (1995). The Three Rs: The way forward. ECVAM Workshop Report 11. ATLA23, 838–866.
11.
CCAC (2013). Three Rs Microsite.Montreal, Canada: Canadian Council on Animal Care Available at: http://3rs.ccac.ca/en/ (Accessed 15.05.13).
12.
NC3Rs (2013). What are the 3Rs?London, UK: National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement & Reduction of Animals in Research. Available at: http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/page.asp?id=7 (Accessed 15.05.13).
13.
CarboneL. (2011). Pain in laboratory animals: The ethical and regulatory imperatives. PLoS ONE6, (9): e21578 [doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021578].
14.
BaumansV., & Van LooP.L.P. (2013). How to improve housing conditions of laboratory animals: The possibilities of environmental refinement. The Veterinary Journal195, 24–32.
15.
JenningsM., BatchelorG.R., BrainP.F., DickA., ElliottH., FrancisR.J., HubrechtR.C., HurstJ.L., MortonD.B., PetersA.G., RaymondR., SalesG.D., SherwinC.M., & WestC. (1998). Refining rodent husbandry: The mouse. Report of the Rodent Refinement Working Party. Laboratory Animals32, 233–259.
16.
Fentner van VlissingenJ.M. (1999). The re-use of animals for research — a humane endpoint? In Humane Endpoints in Animal Experiments for Biomedical Research, pp. 145–147. London, UK: Laboratory Animals Ltd. Available at: http://www.lal.org.uk/publications/this-is-a-test-subject/humane-endpoints/ (Accessed 15.05.13).
17.
BeaulieuM., Ropert-CoudertY., Le MahoY., & AncelA. (2010). Is abdominal implantation of devices a good alternative to external attachment? A comparative study in Adélie penguins. Journal of Ornithology151, 579–586.
18.
CattetM., BoulangerJ., StenhouseG., PowellR.A., & Reynolds-HoglandM.J. (2008). An evaluation of long-term capture effects in ursids: Implications for wildlife welfare and research. Journal of Mammalogy89, 973–990.
19.
LéchenneM.S., ArnemoJ.M., BröjerC., AndrénH., & ÅgrenE.O. (2012). Mortalities due to constipation and dystocia caused by intraperitoneal radio-transmitters in Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx). European Journal of Wildlife Research58, 503–506.
20.
Anon. (2010). Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European UnionL276, 20.10.2010, 33–79.
21.
HonessP., & WolfensohnS. (2010). The extended welfare assessment grid: A matrix for the assessment of welfare and cumulative suffering in experimental animals. ATLA38, 205–212.
22.
WearyD.M. (2012). A good life for laboratory animals – how far must refinement go?ALTEX Proceedings1/12, 11–13.
