Inhumanity in the treatment of laboratory animals leads to ambiguous and otherwise unsatisfactory results
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
RussellW.M.S. & BurchR.L. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique,xiv + 238pp. London, UK: Methuen.
2.
BallsM. (2009). The origins and early development of the Three Rs concept.ATLA37, 255–265.
3.
BallsM. (2012). The wisdom of Russell and Burch: 1. The concept, sources and incidence of inhumanity and its diminution or removal through implementation of the Three Rs.ATLA40, P15–P16.
4.
BurchR.L. (1995). The progress of humane experimental technique since 1959: A personal view.ATLA23, 776–783. Reprinted in ATLA 37, 269–275, 2009.
5.
SmythD. (1978). Alternatives to Animal Experimentation,218pp. London, UK: Scolar Press.
6.
StephensM. (2006). Remembering William Russell.ATLA34, 474–476.
7.
BallsM., GoldbergA.M., FentemJ.H., BroadheadC.L., BurchR.L., FestingM.F.W., FrazierJ.M., HendriksenC.F.M., JenningsM., van der KampM.D.O., MortonD.B., RowanA.N., RussellC., RussellW.M.S., SpielmannH., StephensM.L., StokesW.S., StraughanD.W., YagerJ.D., ZurloJ. & van ZutphenB.F.M. (1995). The Three Rs: The way forward.ATLA23, 838–866.
8.
Anon. (1999). The Three Rs Declaration of Bologna.ATLA28, 1–5.
9.
JohnstonD. (2009). Keeping the archives at the University of Nottingham.ATLA37, Suppl. 2, 107–111.
10.
CapaldoT. & PeppercornM. (2012). A review of autopsy reports on chimpanzees in or from US laboratories.ATLA40, 259–269.
