In India, animal experiments play an integral role in both undergraduate medical education (UGME) and postgraduate medical education (PGME) in the discipline of Pharmacology. Therefore, we aimed to compare the perceptions of pharmacology faculty members in southern India with regard to the use of animal experiments and alternatives in UGME and in PGME. We also determined the association between these perceptions and the socio-demographic characteristics of the participants. Pharmacology faculty members in 15 medical colleges located in southern India answered a 27-statement, 5-domain questionnaire with a total score of 108. The means of the total, domain and statement scores were analysed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The mean total score obtained for faculty members (n = 52) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) for PGME (61.2/108) than that for UGME (51.9/108). Significant differences were observed in the mean total and in the domain scores for PGME when compared to UGME in all of the socio-demographic groups, except for male faculty members and those without an MD or doctoral degree. The mean individual statement scores also indicated that there is more support for animal use in PGME. Overall, it was apparent that pharmacology faculty members in southern Indian medical colleges support animal use in PGME more than in UGME. Increased awareness is required among faculty members concerning alternatives to animal experiments in medical education, especially in PGME.
DikshitR.K. (2007). Postgraduate education in medical pharmacology. Indian Journal of Pharmacology39, 171.
2.
GitanjaliB. (2001). Animal experimentation in teaching: Time to sing a swan song. Indian Journal of Pharmacology33, 71.
3.
HariharanT.S. (2004). Need for changes in the practical pharmacology curriculum of medical undergraduates. Indian Journal of Pharmacology36, 181.
4.
SolankiD. (2010). Unnecessary and cruel use of animals for medical undergraduate training in India. Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics1, 59.
5.
KnightA. (2007). Systematic reviews of animal experiments demonstrate poor human clinical and toxicological utility. ATLA35, 641–659.
6.
LindlT., & VoelkelM. (2011). No clinical relevance of approved animal experiments after seventeen years. ALTEX28, 242–243.
7.
GruberF.P., & HartungT. (2004). Alternatives to animal experimentation in basic research. ALTEX21, S1, 3–31.
8.
MurthyK.R. (2000). Animal experimentation and research in India. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine46, 251.
9.
RoyV., & TekurU. (2001). Animal experiments in medical undergraduate curriculum: A teacher–student perspective. Indian Journal of Pharmacology33, 104–107.
10.
AroraR., & BerryV. (2005). Animal experiments in medical undergraduate curriculum — assessment of students’ views. Health Administrator17, 63–67.
11.
DhingraM.S., SinghA., & SinghJ. (2006). Animal experiments and pharmacology teaching at medical schools in India: A student's eye view. AATEX11, 185–191.
12.
VasundaraK., KanchanP., PundarikakshaH.P., GirishK., PrassanaS., & JyothiR. (2010). An imperative need to change pharmacology curriculum: A pilot survey. Indian Journal of Pharmacology42, 420.
13.
DewhurstD. (2004). Computer-based alternatives to using animals in teaching physiology and pharmacology to undergraduate students. ATLA32, 517–520.
14.
GruberF.P., & DewhurstD.G. (2004). Alternatives to animal experimentation in biomedical education, ALTEX21, 33–48.
15.
GhoshR.K., GhoshS.M., & DattaS. (2010). Training of postgraduate pharmacologists in India — the need for alignment with the emerging roles in the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine56, 168–169.
16.
DasB.P., SethiA., RauniarG.P., & SangarulaH. (2006). Students’ critical appraisal on the evaluation of analgesics in laboratory animal versus simulated clinical trial. Nepal Medical College Journal8, 234–237.
17.
ShehnazS.I., SreedharanJ., MathewE., GomathiK.G., & Sami KhanN. (2011). Willingness to spare animals in undergraduate medical education in southern India: A preliminary questionnaire-based investigation. ATLA39, 557–566.
18.
KuruvillaA., RamalingamS., BoseA.C., ShastriG.V., BhuvaneshwariK., & AmudhaG. (2001). Use of computer assisted learning as an adjuvant to practical pharmacology teaching: advantages and limitation. Indian Journal of Pharmacology33, 272–275.
19.
WangL. (2001). Computer-simulated pharmacology experiments for undergraduate pharmacy students: Experience from an Australian University. Indian Journal of Pharmacology33, 280–282.
20.
KnightA. (2007). The effectiveness of humane teaching methods in veterinary education. ALTEX24, 91–109.
21.
BadyalD.K., ModgillV., & KaurJ. (2009). Computer simulation models are implementable as replacements for animal experiments. ATLA37, 191–195.
Anon. (2012). Government calls to stop animal experiments in medical, pharmacy, and other life sciences education. [ALTEX News, February 2012]. Available at: http://www.altex.ch/en/index.html?id=17&ncat=1&nid=223 (Accessed 18.07.12).
24.
RaiJ., & SinghA. (2006). A study of trend of animal experimentation in medical education in India. JK Science8, 92–94.
25.
AkbarshaM.A., ZeeshanM., & PereiraS. (2011). CPCSEA National Conference, India. ALTEX28, 153–155.
26.
AkbarshaM.A., & PereiraS. (2010). Mahatma Gandhi-Doerenkamp Center for Alternatives to Use of Animals in Life Science Education. Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics1, 108–110.
HakkinenP.J., & GreenD.K. (2002). Alternatives to animal testing: Information resources via the Internet and World Wide Web. Toxicology173, 3–11.
29.
DucceschiL., GreenN., & Miller-SpiegelC. (2010). Dying to learn: The supply and use of companion animals in US colleges and universities. ALTEX27, 304–308.
30.
JukesN. (2004). Replacement of harmful animal use in life science education: The approach and activities of InterNICHE. ATLA32, 511–515.
31.
SauerU.G., WächterT., GruneB., DomsA., AlversM.R., SpielmannH., & SchroederM. (2009). Go3R — semantic Internet search engine for alternative methods to animal testing. ALTEX26, 17–31.
32.
SinghJ. (2012). The national centre for the replacement, refinement, and reduction of animals in research. Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics3, 87–89.
33.
Van der ValkJ. (2006). Animal use and alternatives in education. AATEX12, 1–6.
34.
HowardB., HudsonM., & PreziosiR. (2009). More is less: Reducing animal use by raising awareness of the principles of efficient study design and analysis. ATLA37, 33–42.
35.
ShehnazS.I., & AgarwalA.K. (2012). A structured course in laboratory animal science for postgraduates: Is it a necessity?Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics. [In press.]
36.
Shivprakash (2007). Pharmacology: Take it forward. Indian Journal of Pharmacology39, 3–4.
37.
DangA., GargA., & RataboliP.V. (2009). Current perspectives of medical pharmacology postgraduates in India: Need to commute the system. Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research3, 1601–1602.
38.
ChakrabortyA. (2010). A survey on postgraduate pharmacology education in India. Indian Journal of Pharmacology42, 253–254.
