Two new Korean laws regulating animal welfare and the humane use of animals in science came into effect in 2008 and 2009. Both these laws impose ethical committee review prior to the performance of animal experiments in research, testing and education. This study briefly summarises the new Korean laws, and investigates the current status regarding the numbers of animals used, the alternatives to animals which are used, the curricula relating to the humane use of animals, and ethical review practices in Korean veterinary education. Approximately 4,845 animals, representing 20 different species, were used in veterinary medical education in Korea in 2007. Korea has begun to introduce formal courses on animal welfare for the humane treatment of animals used in experiments, and an ethical protocol review system prior to animal use in education. Korea is moving toward better animal welfare, by incorporating practices consistent with international standards. The information presented represents the first such data gathered in Korea, which should prove useful for monitoring the implementation of replacement, reduction, and refinement measures in animal use for education purposes.
RussellW.M.S. & BurchR.L. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, 238pp. London, UK: Methuen.
4.
BroomD.M. (2005). Animal welfare education: Development and prospects. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education32, 438–441.
5.
OrlansF.B. (2000). An ethical rationale for why students should not be permitted to harm or kill animals. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experiments (ed. BallsM., van ZellerAM. & HalderM.E.), pp. 1323–1331. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science BV.
WillemsR.A. (2007). Animals in veterinary medical teaching: Compliance and regulatory issues, the US perspective. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education34, 615–619.
8.
De BooJ. & KnightA. (2005). Educating the veterinary professional about animal welfare. [Proceedings 5th World Congress 2005, Alternatives to Animal Experimentation], ALTEX23, Special Issue, 71–74.
9.
De BooJ. & KnightA. (2005). “Concepts in animal welfare”: a syllabus in animal welfare science and ethics for veterinary schools. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education32, 451–453.
10.
Laboratory Animal Resources Team (2008). Handbook of the Laboratory Animal Care and Management Course, pp. 207–212. Seoul, Korea: Korean Food and Drug Safety Administration, Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs.
11.
Animal Welfare Divison (2008). Handbook of Training for Animal Facilities, p. 15. Seoul, Korea: The National Veterinary Research & Science Quarantine Service.
12.
Animal Welfare Divison (2009). Handbook of the Training Course for IACUC, p. 36. Seoul, Korea: The National Veterinary Research & Science Quarantine Service.
Van ZutphenB.F.M. (2004). The European Science Foundation: Three Rs policy and education. ATLA32, 533–537.
15.
NevalainenT., BlomH.J.M., GuaitaniA., HardyP.B., HowardR. & VergaraP. (2002). FELASA recommendations for the accreditation of laboratory animal science education and training. Laboratory Animals36, 373–377.
16.
BalcombeJ., HughesI.E. & DaviesA. (2000). Session summary: The use of animals in education and training. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. BallsM., van ZellerA-M. & HalderM.E.), pp. 1321–1322. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science BV.
17.
Van ZutphenB. & BlomH.J.M. (2000). Education and training on the Three Rs: requirements and implementation. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. BallsM., van ZellerA-M. & HalderM.E.), pp. 1375–1382. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science BV.
18.
BalcombeJ. (2000). A global overview of law and policy concerning animal use in education. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. BallsM., van ZellerA-M. & HalderM.E.), pp. 1343–1350. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science BV.
van der ValkJ.C. (2006). Animal use and alternatives in education. AATEX12, 1–6.
21.
CervinkaM., RudolfE., & CervinkovaZ. (2005). Alternatives to animal experimentation in undergraduate curricula at medical schools — analysis of current trends in the Czech Republic. [Proceedings 5th World Congress 2005, Alternatives to Animal Experimentation], ALTEX23, Special Issue, 46–50.
22.
JukesN. & MartinsenS. (2006). The InterNICHE policy on the use of animals and alternatives in education. [Proceedings 5th World Congress 2005, Alternatives to Animal Experimentation], ALTEX23, Special Issue, 58–62.
23.
KumarA.M., MurtaughR., BrownD., BallasT., ClancyE., & PatronekG. (2001). Client donation program for acquiring dogs and cats to teach veterinary gross anatomy. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education28, 73–77.
24.
MillmanS.T., AdamasC.L. & TurnerP.V. (2005). Animal welfare training at the Ontario Veterinary College. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education32, 447–450.
