ECETOC (2008). Triggering and Waiving Criteria for the Extended One-generation Reproduction Toxicity Study. Document No. 45, 51 pp. Brussels, Belgium: European Centre for Ecotoxicology & Toxicology of Chemicals. Available at: http://www.ecetoc.org/technical-documents (Accessed 10.03.09).
2.
ECETOC (2008). Workshop on Triggering and Waiving Criteria for the Extended One-generation Reproduction Toxicity Study: 14–15 April 2008, Barza d'Ispra. Workshop Report No. 12. 33 pp. Brussels, Belgium: European Centre for Ecotoxicology & Toxicology of Chemicals. Available at: http://www.ecetoc.org/workshop-reports (Accessed 10.03.09).
3.
OECD (2001). OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals. No. 416. Two-Generation Reproduction Toxicity, 13 pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
4.
European Union (2007). Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, L136, 3–280.
5.
OECD (1983). OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals. No. 415. One-generation Reproduction Toxicity, 8 pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
6.
JanerG., HakkertB.C., SlobW., VermeireT. & PiersmaA.H. (2007). A retrospective analysis of the two-generation study: What is the added value of the second generation? Reproductive Toxicology24, 97–102.
7.
MakrisS.L. (2004). Unpublished data. Washington, DC, USA: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Health Effects Division. Cited in (8).
8.
CooperR.L., LambJ.C.IV, BarlowS.M., BentleyK., BradyA.M., DoerrerN.G., EisenbrandtD.L., Fenner-CrispP.A., HinesR.N., IrvineL.F.H., KimmelC.A., KoeterH., LiA.A., MakrisS.L., SheetsL.P., SpeijersG.J.A. & WhitbyK.E. (2006). A tiered approach to life stages testing for agricultural chemical safety assessment. Critical Reviews in Toxicology36, 69–98.
9.
CarmichaelN.G., BartonH.A., BoobisA.R., CooperR.L., DellarcoV.L., DoerrerN.G., Fenner-CrispP.A., DoeJ.E., LambJ.C.IV & PastoorT.P. (2006). Agricultural chemical safety assessment: a multisector approach to the modernization of human safety requirements. Critical Reviews in Toxicology36, 1–7.
10.
BremerS., PellizzerC., HoffmannS., SeidleT. & HartungT. (2007). The development of new concepts for assessing reproductive toxicity applicable to large scale toxicological programs. Current Pharmaceutical Design13, 3047–3058.
11.
OECD (2007). OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals. No. 426. Developmental Neurotoxicity Study, 26 pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
12.
OECD (2001). OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals. No. 414. Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study, 11 pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
13.
European Union (1986). Council Directive of 24 November 1986 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European Communities, L358, 1–28.
14.
ICH (2005). Detection of Toxicity to Reproduction for Medicinal Products and Toxicity to Male Fertility S5 (R2). ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline, 24 pp. Geneva, Switzerland: International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registrations of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use.
15.
MyersD.P., WilloughbyC.R., BottomleyA.M. & BuschmannJ. (2008). An analysis of the results from two-generation reproduction toxicity studies to assess the value of mating animals of the second (F1) generation for the detection of adverse treatment-related effects on reproductive performance. Reproductive Toxicology26, 47–50.
16.
OECD (1995). OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals. No. 407. Repeated dose 28-day oral toxicity study in rodents, 8 pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
17.
OECD (1998). OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals. No. 408. Repeated dose 90-day oral toxicity study in rodents, 10 pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
18.
KlimischH.J., AndreaeM. & TillmannU. (1997). A systematic approach for evaluating the quality of experimental toxicological and ecotoxicological data. Regulatory Toxicology & Pharmacology25, 1–5.