This essay summarises the author's thoughts on the current paradigm change in toxicology. The driving factors and mechanisms of this change, and obstacles to it, are discussed. Current developments are discussed on the basis of some key assumptions in Thomas Kuhn's famous book, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. The author's personal view is that there is clear evidence that revolutionary changes in regulatory toxicology are emerging.
KuhnT.S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd edn, 212pp. Chicago, IL, USA:University of Chicago Press.
3.
PajaresF. (Undated). Outline and Study Guide to The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. Kuhn. Atlanta, GA, USA: Emory University. Available at: http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp/Kuhn.html (Accessed 15.10.08).
4.
GehringW.J. (1998). Master Control Genes in Development and Evolution: The Homeobox Story, 254pp. Yale, CT, USA:Yale University Press.
5.
BozellecaJ.F. (2001). The art, the science and the seduction of toxicology: an evolution. In Principles and Methods of Toxicology (ed. A.W. Hayes) 4th edn, pp. 1–22. Philadelphia, PA, USA:Taylor & Francis.
6.
HartungT. (2008). Food for thought… on animal tests. ALTEX25, 3–9.
7.
HoffmannS. & HartungT. (2005). Diagnosis: Toxic! — Trying to apply approaches of clinical diagnostics and prevalence in toxicology considerations. Toxicological Science85, 422–428.
8.
HoffmannS. & HartungT. (2006). Towards an evidence-based toxicology. Human & Experimental Toxicology25, 497–513.
9.
HartungT. (2007). Food for thought… on cell culture. ALTEX24, 143–147.
10.
HartungT. (2008). Thoughts on limitations of animal models. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders14, S81–83.
11.
HartungT. & LeistM. (2008). Food for thought… on the evolution of toxicology and phasing out of animal testing. ALTEX25, 91–96.
12.
LeistM., HartungT. & NicoteraP. (2008). The dawning of a new age of toxicology. ALTEX25, 103–114.
13.
HartungT. (2009). Toxicology kissed awake. Nature, London (in press).
14.
DoullJ. (2001). Toxicology comes of age. Annual Reviews of Pharmacology & Toxicology41, 1–21.
HöferT., GernerI., Gundert-RemyV., LiebschM., SchulteA., SpielmannH., VogelR. & WettigK. (2004). Animal testing and alternative approaches for the human health risk assessment under the proposed new European chemicals regulation. Archives of Toxicology78, 549–564.
19.
European Commission (2006). Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/ EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/ 67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC.Official Journal of the European UnionL396/1 (30.12.06), 1–849.
20.
SchaeferC., SpielmannH. & VetterK. (2006). Arzneiverordnung in Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit, 781pp. Jena, Germany:Urban & Fischer.
21.
BremerS., PellizzerC., HoffmannS., SeidleT. & HartungT. (2007). The development of new concepts for assessing reproductive toxicity applicable to large scale toxicological programs. Current Pharmaceutical Design13, 3047–3058.
22.
HartungT. (2008). Food for thought… on alternative methods for cosmetics safety testing. ALTEX25, 147–162.
23.
FriedmanT.L. (2005). The World is Flat. A Brief History of the 21st Century, 496pp. New York, NY, USA:Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
European Commission (2001). White Paper —Strategy for a Future Chemicals Policy. COM(2001) 88 Final, 321pp. Brussels, Belgium:Commission of the European Communities.
27.
National Research Council (2007). Toxicity Testing in the 21st Century: A Vision and a Strategy.National Research Council Committee on Toxicity Testing and Assessment of Environmental Agents, 196pp. Washington, DC, USA:The National Academies Press. Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11970 (Accessed 15.10.08).
28.
CollinsF.S., GrayG.M. & BucherJ.R. (2008). Toxicology: transforming environmental health protection. Science, New York319, 906–907.
