Anon. (2007). Fifth Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the Statistics on the number of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes in the member states of the European Union COM/2007/675 final. Brussels, Belgium:EC. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/chemicals/lab_animals/reports_en.htm (Accessed 11.06.08).
3.
RussellW.M.S. & BurchR.L. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, 238pp. London, UK:Methuen.
4.
HartungT., BremerS., CasatiS., CoeckeS., CorviR., FortanerS., GribaldoL., HalderM., RoiA.J., PrietoP., SabbioniE., WorthA. & ZuangV. (2003). ECVAM's response to the changing political environment for alternatives: Consequences of the European Union chemicals and cosmetics policy. ATLA31, 473–481.
5.
Anon. (1986). Council Directive 86/609/EEC of 24 November 1986 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European CommunitiesL358, 1–28.
6.
Anon. (1991). Establishment of a European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (CEVMA). Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, SEC(91) 1794 final, 6pp. Brussels, Belgium:EC. (See Annex 1.)
7.
HartungT. (2006). ECVAM's progress in implementing the 3Rs in Europe. ALTEX23, Suppl., 21–28.
8.
LahlU. (2006). Strategy for Minimising the Use of Animal Testing as Part of REACH, 12pp. Berlin, German: Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety. Available at: http://www.bmu.de/English/chemicalsafety/doc/35887.php (Accessed 11.06.08).
9.
SchiffelersM-J., HagelsteinG., HarremanA., & van der SpekM. (2005). Regulatory Animal Testing — A Survey of the Factors Influencing the Use of Animal Testing to Meet Regulatory Requirements, 80pp. Utrecht, The Netherlands: University of Utrecht. Available at: http://www.bio.uu.nl/wetenschapswinkel/content/publicaties/pub-dierenwelz.html (Accessed 11.06.08).
10.
BottiniA.A., AmcoffP. & HartungT. (2007). Food for thought… on globalization of alternative methods. ALTEX24, 255–261.
11.
HartungT. (2007). Food for thought… on validation. ALTEX24, 67–72.
12.
HartungT., BremerS., CasatiS., CoeckeS., CorviR., FortanerS., GribaldoL., HalderM., HoffmannS., RoiA.J., PrietoP., SabbioniE., ScottL., WorthA. & ZuangV. (2004). A modular approach to the ECVAM principles on test validity. ATLA32, 467–472.
13.
BallsM., AmcoffP., BremerS., CasatiS., CoeckeS., ClothierR., CombesR., CorviR., CurrenR., EskesC., FentemJ., GribaldoL., HalderM., HartungT., HoffmannS., SchechtmanL., ScottL., SpielmannH., StokesW., TiceR., WagnerD. & ZuangV. (2006). The principles of weight of evidence validation of test methods and testing strategies. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 58. ATLA34, 603–620.
14.
HoffmannS. & HartungT. (2005). Diagnosis: Toxic! — Trying to apply approaches of clinical diagnostics and prevalence in toxicology considerations. Toxicological Sciences85, 422–428.
15.
HoffmannS. & HartungT. (2006). Towards an evidence-based toxicology. Human & Experimental Toxicology25, 497–513.