An approach for predicting acute aquatic toxicity, in the form of a quantitative structure–activity–activity relationship (QSAAR), is described. This study assessed relative toxic effects to a fish, Pimephales promelas, and a ciliate, Tetrahymena pyriformis, and attempted to form relationships between them. A good agreement between toxic potencies (R2 = 0.754) was found for a chemically diverse dataset of 364 compounds, when using toxicity to the ciliate as a surrogate to that for fish. This relationship was extended by adding three theoretical structural descriptors of the molecules. The inclusion of these descriptors improved the relationship further (R2 = 0.824). The structural features that were found to improve the extrapolation between the toxicity to the two different species were related to the electron distribution of the carbon skeleton of the toxicant, its hydrogen-bonding ability, and its relative nitrogen content. Such a QSAAR approach provides a potential tool for predicting the toxicities of chemicals for environmental risk assessment and thus for reducing animal tests.
ArcherG., BallsM., BrunerL.H., CurrenR.D., FentemJ.H., HolzhütterH-G., LiebschM., LovelD.P., & SoutheeJ.A. (1997). The validation of toxicological prediction models. ATLA25, 505–516.
3.
WorthA.P., & BallsM. (2001). The importance of the prediction model in the validation of alternative tests. ATLA29, 135–143.
4.
SchultzT.W., & CroninM.T.D. (2003). Essential and desirable characteristics of ecotoxicity quantitative structure–activity relationships. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry22, 599–607.
5.
SchultzT.W., CroninM.T.D., WalkerJ.D., & AptulaA.O. (2003). Quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSARs) in toxicology: a historical perspective. Journal of Molecular Structure (Theochem)622, 1–22.
6.
CroninM.T.D. (2005). Toxicological information for use in predictive modelling: quality, sources, and databases. In Predictive Toxicology (ed. HelmaC.), pp. 93–133. Boca Raton, FL, USA: Taylor and Francis.
7.
BradburyS.P., RussomC.L., AnkleyG.T., SchultzT.W., & WalkerJ.D. (2003). Overview of data and conceptual approaches for derivation of quantitative structure–activity relationships for ecotoxicological effects of organic chemicals. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry22, 1789–1798.
8.
SewardJ.R., HamblenE.L., & SchultzT.W. (2002). Regression comparisons of Tetrahymena pyriformis and Poecilia reticulata toxicity. Chemosphere47, 93–101.
9.
CroninM.T.D., & DeardenJ.C. (1995). QSAR in toxicology 2. Prediction of acute mammalian toxicity and interspecies relationships. Quantitative Structure– Activity Relationships14, 117–120.
10.
RosenkranzH.S., & CunninghamA.R. (2005). Lack of predictivity of the rat lethality (LD50) test for ecological and human health effects. ATLA33, 9–19.
11.
BeardenA.P., & SchultzT.W. (1998). Comparison of Tetrahymena and Pimephales toxicity based on mechanism of action. SARs and QSARs in Environmental Research9, 127–153.
12.
CroninM.T.D., DeardenJ.C., & DobbsA.J. (1991). QSAR studies of comparative toxicity in aquatic organisms. The Science of the Total Environment109/110, 431–439.
13.
van WezelA.P., & OpperhuizenA. (1995). Narcosis due to environmental pollutants in aquatic organisms: residue-based toxicity, mechanisms, and membrane burdens. Critical Reviews in Toxicology25, 255–279.
14.
BeardenA.P., SinksG.D., & SchultzT.W. (1999). Acclimation to sublethal exposures to a model nonpolar narcotic: population growth kinetics and membrane lipid alterations in Tetrahymena pyriformis.Aquatic Toxicology46, 11–21.
15.
DimitrovS.D., MekenyanO.G., SinksG.D., & SchultzT.W. (2000). Global modelling of narcotic chemicals: ciliate and fish toxicity. Journal of Molecular Structure (Theochem)622, 63–70.
16.
DimitrovS., KolevaY., SchultzT.W., WalkerJ.D., & MekenyanO.G. (2004). Interspecies quantitative structure–activity relationship model for aldehydes: aquatic toxicity. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry23, 463–470.
17.
SinksG.D., & SchultzT.W. (2001). Correlation of Tetrahymena and Pimephales toxicity: evaluation of 100 additional compounds. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry20, 917–921.
18.
NetzevaT.I., WorthA.P., AldenbergT., BenigniR., CroninM.T.D., GramaticaP., JaworskaJ.S., KlopmanG., MarchantC.A., MyattG., Nikolova-JeliazkovaN., PatlewiczG.Y., PerkinsR., RobertsD.W., SchultzT.W., StantonD.T., van de SandtJ.J.M., TongW., VeithG., & YangC. (2005). Current status of methods for defining the applicability domain of (quantitative) structure–activity relationships: The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 52. ATLA33, 155–173.
19.
CroninM.T.D., & SchultzT.W. (2003). Pitfalls in QSAR. Journal of Molecular Structure (Theochem)622, 39–51.
20.
BrookeL.T., CallD.J., GeigerD.L., & NorthcottC.E. eds. (1984). Acute Toxicity of Organic Chemicals to Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas), Vol. 1, 414 pp. Wisconsin, WI, USA: Center for Lake Superior Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin.
21.
GeigerD.L., NorthcottC.E., CallD.J., & BrookeL.T. eds. (1985). Acute Toxicity of Organic Chemicals to Fathead Minnow (Pimephales promelas), Vol. 2, 326 pp. Wisconsin, WI, USA: Center for Lake Superior Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin.
22.
RussomC.L., BradburyS.P., BroderiusS.J., HammermeisterD.E., & DrummondR.A. (1997). Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: acute toxicity in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry16, 948–967.
CroninM.T.D., GregoryB.W., & SchultzT.W. (1998). Quantitative structure–activity analyses of nitrobenzene toxicity to Tetrahymena pyriformis.Chemical Research in Toxicology11, 902–908.
25.
CroninM.T.D., MangaN., SewardR., SinksG.D., & SchultzT.W. (2001). Parametrization of electrophilicity for the prediction of toxicity of aromatic compounds. Chemical Research in Toxicology14, 1498–1505.
26.
SewardJ.R., CroninM.T.D., & SchultzT.W. (2001). Structure–toxicity analyses of Tetrahymena pyriformis exposed to pyridines — an examination into extension of surface-response domain. SARs and QSARs in Environmental Research11, 489–512.
27.
SchultzT.W. (1999). Structure–toxicity relationships for benzenes evaluated with Tetrahymena pyriformis.Chemical Research in Toxicology12, 1262–1267.
28.
SewardJ.R., & SchultzT.W. (1999). QSAR analyses of the toxicity of aliphatic carboxylic acids and salts to Tetrahymena pyriformis.SARs and QSARs in Environmental Research10, 557–567.
29.
SchultzT.W., CroninM.T.D., NetzevaT.I., & AptulaT.I. (2002). Structure–toxicity relationships for aliphatic chemicals evaluated with Tetrahymena pyriformis.Chemical Research in Toxicology15, 1602–1609.
30.
SchultzT.W. (1997). TETRATOX: Tetrahymena pyriformis population growth impairment endpoint — A surrogate for fish lethality. Toxicology Methods7, 289–309.
31.
HalgrenT.A. (1996). Merck Molecular Force Field. I.–V. Journal of Computational Chemistry17, 490–641.
32.
HalgrenT.A. (1999). MMFF VII. Characterization of MMFF94, MMFF94s, and other widely available force fields for conformational energies and for intermolecular-interaction energies and geometries. Journal of Computational Chemistry20, 730–748.
33.
ChangG., GuidaW.C., & StillW.C. (1989). An internal-coordinate Monte Carlo method for searching conformational space. Journal of American Chemical Society111, 4379–4386.
34.
SaundersM., HoukK.N., WuY.D., StillW.C., LiptonM., ChangG., & GuidaW.C. (1990). Conformations of cycloheptadecane. A comparison of methods for conformational searching. Journal of American Chemical Society112, 1419–1427.
35.
MacroModel (2000). MacroModel version 7.0, Interactive Molecular Modelling System.Portland, OR, USA: Schrödinger, Inc.
36.
BakerJ. (1986). An algorithm for the location of transition states. Journal of Computational Chemistry7, 385–395.
37.
StewartJ.J.P. (1989). Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods. I & II. Method. Journal of Computational Chemistry10, 209–264.
38.
StewartJ.J.P. (1989). MOPAC 6.0 Program Package. QCPE, No 455.
39.
KatritzkyA.R., LobanovV.S., & KarelsonM. (1995). QSPR: The correlation and quantitative prediction of chemical and physical properties from structure. Chemical Society Reviews24, 279–287.
40.
KatritzkyA.R., LobanovV.S., & KarelsonM. (1994). CODESSA: Reference manual (version 2.0).27 pp. Gainesville, FL, USA: University of Florida.
41.
KarelsonM. (2000). Molecular Descriptors in QSAR/QSPR, 448 pp. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
42.
KarelsonM., LobanovV.S., & KatritzkyA.R. (1996). Quantum-chemical descriptors in QSAR/QSPR studies. Chemical Reviews96, 1027–1043.
43.
Anon. (2001). PALLAS version 3.0.107 pp. Sedona, AZ, USA: CompuDrug International, Inc.
44.
KatritzkyA.R., MuL., LobanovV.S., & KarelsonM. (1996). Correlation of boiling points with molecular structure. 1. A training set of 298 diverse organics and test set of 9 simple inorganics. Journal of Physical Chemistry100, 10400–10407.
45.
SchultzT.W., NetzevaT.I., RobertsD.W., & CroninM.T.D. (2005). Structure–toxicity relationships for the effects to Tetrahymena pyriformis of aliphatic, carbonyl-containing, αβ-unsaturated chemicals. Chemical Research in Toxicology18, 330–341.
46.
ZhaoY.H., JiG.D., CroninM.T.D., & DeardenJ.C. (1998). QSAR study of the toxicity of benzoic acids to Vibrio fischeri, Daphnia magna and carp. The Science of the Total Environment216, 205–215.
47.
ZefirovN.S., KirpichenokM.A., IsmailovF.F., & TrofimovM.I. (1987). Calculation schemes for atomic electronegativities in molecular graphs within the framework of Sanderson principle. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSR296, 883–887.
48.
WorthA.P., van LeeuwenC.J., & HartungT. (2004). The prospects for using (Q)SARs in a changing political environment — high expectations and a key role for the European Commission's Joint Research Centre. SARs and QSARs in Environmental Research15, 331–343.
49.
OECD (2004). Annexes to the Report on Principles for Establishing the Status of Development and Validation of (Quantitative) Structure–Activity Relationships [(Q)SARs]. ENV/JM/TG(2004)27/ANN. Final report. 206 pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
50.
CroninM.T.D., AptulaA.O., DuffyJ.C., NetzevaT.I., RoweP.H., ValkovaI.V., & SchultzT.W. (2002). Comparative assessment of methods to develop QSARs for the prediction of the toxicity of phenols to Tetrahymena pyriformis.Chemosphere49, 1201–1221.
51.
LeeY., BuchananB.G., MattisonD.M., KlopmanG., & RosenkranzH.S. (1995). Learning rules to predict rodent carcinogenicity of non-genotoxic chemicals. Mutation Research — Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis328, 127–149.
52.
ClemedsonC., DierickxP.J., & SjostromM. (2003). The prediction of human acute systemic toxicity by the EDIT/MEIC in vitro test battery: The importance of protein binding and of partitioning into lipids. ATLA31, 245–256.
53.
ClemedsonC., & EkwallB. (1999). Overview of the final MEIC results: I. The in vitro–in vivo evaluation. Toxicology in Vitro13, 657–663.
