SpielmannH., MüllerL., AverbeckD., BallsM., Brendler-SchwaabS., CastellJ.V., CurrenR., de SilvaO., GibbsN.K., LiebschM., LovellW.W., MerkH.F., NashJ.F., NeumannN.J., PapeW.J.W., UlrichP., & VohrH.-W. (2000). The second ECVAM workshop on phototoxicity testing. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 42. ATLA28, 777–814.
2.
BorenfreundE., & PuernerJ.A. (1985). Toxicity determined in vitro by morphological alterations and neutral red absorption. Toxicology Letters24, 119–124.
3.
SpielmannH., LovellW.W., HöelzleE., JohnsonB.E., MaurerT., & MirandaM. (1994). In vitro phototoxicity testing. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 2. ATLA22, 314–348.
4.
SpielmannH., LiebschM., DoeringB., & MoldenhauerF. (1996). First results of the EU/COLIPA validation trial “In vitro phototoxicity testing”. In vitro Toxicology9, 325–338.
5.
HolzhütterH.G. (1997). A general measure of in vitro phototoxicity derived from pairs of dose-response curves and its use for predicting the in vivo phototoxicity of chemicals. ATLA25, 445–462.
6.
PetersB., & HolzhütterH.G. (2002). In Vitro Phototoxicity Testing: Development and validation of a new concentration response analysis software and biostatistical analyses related to the use of various prediction models. ATLA30, 415–432.
7.
SpielmannH., BallsM., DupuisJ., PapeW.J.W., PechovitchG., De SilvaO., HolzhütterH.G., ClothierR., DesolleP., GerberickF., LiebschM., LovellW.W., MaurerT., PfannenbeckerU., PotthastJ.M., CsatoM., SladowskiD., SteilingW., & BrantomP. (1998). The international EU/COLIPA In vitro phototoxicity validation study: results of phase II (blind trial), part 1: the 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test. Toxicology in Vitro12, 305–327.
8.
OECD (2004). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 432: In Vitro 3T3 NRU Phototoxicity Test.15 pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
9.
SpielmannH., BallsM., BrandM., DöringB., HolzhütterH.G., KalweitS., KlecakG., L'EpattenierH., LiebschM., LovellW.W., MaurerT., MoldenhauerF., MooreL., PapeW.J.W., PfannenbeckerU., PotthastJ., De SilvaO., SteilingW., & WillshawA. (1994). EC/COLIPA project on in vitro phototoxicity testing: first results obtained with the Balb/c 3T3 cell phototoxicity assay. Toxicology in Vitro8, 793–796.
10.
MaierK., Schmitt-LandgrafR., & SiegemundB. (1991). Development of an in vitro test system with human skin cells for evaluation of phototoxicity. Toxicology in Vitro5, 457–461.
11.
SpielmannH., BallsM., DupuisJ., PapeW.J.W., de SilvaO., HolzhuetterH.G., GerberickF., LiebschM., LovellW.W., & PfannenbeckerU. (1998). A study on UV filter chemicals from Annex VII of EU Directive 76/768/EEC in the 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test. ATLA26, 679–708.
12.
EC (2000). Commission Directive 2000/33/EC of 25 April 2000 adapting to technical progress for the 27th time Council Directive 67/548/EC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. Annex V B.41 Phototoxicity - in vitro 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test. Official Journal of the European CommunitiesL136, 98–107.
13.
OECD (2002). Test Guidelines Programme Draft Proposal for a New Guideline 432 “In Vitro 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test”.15 pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
14.
EMEA (2002). Note for Guidance on Photosafety Testing (CPMP/SWP/398/01). 8 pp. London, UK: European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products. Website http://www.emea.eu.int (Accessed 31.08.04).
15.
US FDA (2003). Guidance for Industry - Photosafety Testing. 24 pp. Rockville, MD, USA: US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER).
16.
SCCNFP (2003). The Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products Intended for Consumers: Notes of Guidance for Testing of Cosmetic Ingredients for their Safety Evaluation. 5th Revision, adopted by the SCCNFP during the plenary meeting of 20 October 2003 (SCCNFP/0690/03 Final). 102 pp. Brussels, Belgium: DG SANCO/C/2, European Commission.
17.
ClothierR., WillshawA., CoxM., GarleM., BowlerH., & CombesR. (1999). The use of human keratinocytes in the EU/COLIPA international in vitro phototoxicity test validation study and the ECVAM/COLIPA study on UV filter chemicals. ATLA27, 247–259.
18.
JonesP.A., KingA.V., EarlL.K., & LawrenceR.S. (2003). An assessment of the phototoxic hazard of a personal product ingredient using in vitro assays. Toxicology in Vitro17, 471–480.
19.
EC (1986). Council Directive 86/609/EEC of 24 November 1986 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European CommunitiesL358, 18.12.86.
20.
EU (2003). Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products. Official Journal of the European UnionL66, 11.03.04, 26–35.
21.
BallsM., & CorcelleG. (1998). ECVAM news and views: Statement on the scientific validity of the 3T3 NRU PT test (an in vitro test for phototoxic potential). ATLA26, 7–8.
22.
LiebschM., SpielmannH., BallsM., BrandM., DöringB., DupuisJ., HolzhütterH.G., KlecakG., L'EplattenierH., LovellW.W., MaurerT., MoldenhauerF., MooreL., PapeW.J.W., PfannenbeckerU., PotthastJ., De SilvaO., SteilingW., & WillshawA. (1994). First results of the EC/COLIPA validation project “in vitro phototoxicity testing”. In Alternative Methods in Toxicology (ed. RougierA., GoldbergA., & MaibachH.), vol. 10: In Vitro Skin Toxicology — Irritation, Phototoxicity, Sensitization, pp. 243–254. New York, USA: Mary Ann Liebert.
PapeW.J.W., BrandtM., & PfannenbeckerU. (1994). Combined in vitro assay for photohaemolysis and haemoglobin oxidation as part of a phototoxicity test system assessed with various phototoxic substances. Toxicology in Vitro8, 755–757.
28.
PapeW.J.W., MaurerT., PfannenbeckerU., & SteilingW. (2001). The Red Blood Cell Phototoxicity Test (Photohaemolysis and Haemoglobin Oxidation). EU/COLIPA Validation Programme on Phototoxicity (Phase II). ATLA29, 145–162.
JohnsonB.E., WalkerE.M., & HetheringtonA.M. (1986). In vitro models for cutaneous phototoxicity. In Skin Models, Models to Study Function and Disease of Skin (ed. MarksR., & Plewig), pp. 264–281. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
31.
KahnG., & FleischakerB.I. (1971). Red blood cell haemolysis by photosensitizing compounds. Journal of Investigative Dermatology56, 85–90.
32.
TraynorN.J., JohnsonB.E., & GibbsN.K. (1996). Photohaemolysis assay for drug phototoxicity complicated by “bleaching of released haemoglobin”. Toxicology in Vitro10, 619–624.
33.
OkamotoY., RyuA., & OhkoshiK. (1999). In vitro alternatives and phototoxicity testing. I. Evaluation of in vitro phototoxicity assays. ATLA27, 639–644.
34.
WinterbournC.C. (1986). Free-radical production and oxidative reactions of haemoglobin. Environmental Health Perspectives64, 321–330.
35.
EdwardsS.M., DonnellyT.A., SayreR.M., RheinsL.A., SpielmannH., & LiebschM. (1994). Quantitative in vitro assessment of phototoxicity using a human skin model: Skin2. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine10, 111–117.
36.
LiebschM., DöringB., DonellyT.A., LogemannP., RheinsL.A., & SpielmannH. (1995). Application of the human dermal model Skin2 ZK 1350 to phototoxicity and skin corrosivity testing. Toxicology in Vitro9, 557–562.
37.
RoguetR., CohenC., & RougierA. (1994). A reconstituted human epidermis to assess cutaneous irritation, photoirritation and photoprotection in vitro. In Alternative Methods in Toxicology, 10: In Vitro Skin Toxicology — Irritation, Phototoxicity, Sensitization (eds. RougierA., GoldbergA., & MaibachH.), pp. 141–149. New York, USA: Mary Ann Libert.
38.
LiebschM., BarrabasC., TraueT., & SpielmannH. (1997). Entwicklung eines in vitro Tests auf dermale Phototoxizität in einem Modell menschlicher Epidermis (EpiDerm™). ALTEX14, 165–174.
39.
LiebschM., TraueD., BarrabasC., SpielmannH., GerberickG.F., CruseL., DiembeckW., PfannenbeckerU., SpiekerJ., HolzhütterH.G., BrantomP., AspinP., & SoutheeJ. (1999). Prevalidation of the EpiDerm phototoxicity test. In Alternatives to Animal Testing II: Proceedings of the second international scientific conference organised by the European Cosmetic Industry, Brussels, Belgium (ed. ClarkD., LisanskyS., & MacmillanR.), pp. 160–166. Newbury, UK: CPL Press.
40.
JonesP., KingA., LovellW., & EarlL. (1999). Phototoxicity testing using 3-D reconstructed human skin models. In Alternatives to Animal Testing II: Proceedings of the second international scientific conference organised by the European Cosmetic Industry, Brussels, Belgium (ed. ClarkD., LisanskyS., & MacmillanR.), pp. 138–141. Newbury, UK: CPL Press.
41.
BernardF.X., BarraultC., DegueryA., de WeverB., & RosdyM. (1999). Development of a highly sensitive phototoxicity assay using the reconstructed human epidermis SkinEthik. In Alternatives to Animal Testing II: Proceedings of the second international scientific conference organised by the European Cosmetic Industry, Brussels, Belgium (ed. ClarkD., LisanskyS., & MacmillanR.), pp. 133–137. Newbury, UK: CPL Press.
42.
ApiA.M. (1997). In vitro assessment of phototoxicity. In Vitro Toxicology10, 339–350.
43.
AugustinC., CollombelC., & DamourO. (1997). Use of dermal equivalent and skin equivalent models for identifying phototoxic compounds in vitro.Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine13, 27–36.
44.
Holzhütter (1998). Annex 4 (Biostatistical Analysis) to Final Report of the ECVAM Prevalidation Project: “Prevalidation of the EpiDerm Phototoxicity Test”.11 pp. European Commission contract number 11279-95-10-F1ELD ISP GB.
45.
GorelickN.J. (1996). Validation issues for the use of transgenic mouse mutation assays in risk assessment. Progress in Clinical and Biological Research395, 81–108.
46.
NishikawaT., HaresakuM., AdachiK., MasudaM., & HayashiM. (1999). Study of rat skin in vivo micronucleus test: data generated by mitomycin C and methyl methanesulfonate. Mutation Research444, 159–166.
47.
NishikawaT., HaresakuM., FukushimaA., NakamuraT., AdachiK., MasudaM., & HayashiM. (2002). Further evaluation of an in vivo micronucleus test on rat and mouse skin: results of five skin carcinogens. Mutation Research513, 93–102.
48.
ItohS., KatohM., & FuruhamaK. (2002). In vivo photochemical micronucleus induction due to certain quinolone antimicrobial agents in the skin of hairless mice. Mutation Research520, 133–139.
49.
BuleraS.J., TheissJ.C., FesterlingT.A., & de la IglesiaF.A. (1999). In vitro photogenotoxic activity of clinafloxacin: A paradigm predicting photocarcinogenicity. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology156, 222–230.
50.
LoprienoN. (1991). In vitro assay systems for testing photomutagenic chemicals. Mutagenesis6, 331–333.
51.
GockeE., MüllerL., GuzzieP.J., Brendler-SchwaabS., BuleraS., ChignellC.F., HendersonL.M., JacobsA., MurliH., SnyderR.D., & TanakaN. (2000). Considerations on photochemical genotoxicity: Report of the IWGPT Working Group. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis35, 173–184.
52.
Brendler-SchwaabS., CzichA., EpeB., GockeE., KainaB., MüllerL., PolletD., & UteschD. (2004). Photochemical genotoxicity: principles and test methods. Report of a GUM task force. Mutation Research566, 65–91.
53.
JoseJ.G. (1979). Photomutagenesis by chlorinated phenothiazine tranquilizers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA76, 469–72.
54.
COLIPA (1995). Photomutagenicity Task Force, Final report.Brussels, Belgium: COLIPA.
55.
DeanS.W., LaneM., DunmoreR.H., RuddockS.P., MartinC.N., KirklandD.J., & LoprienoN. (1991). Development of assays for the detection of photomutagenicity of chemicals during exposure to UV light. I. Assay development. Mutagenesis6, 335–341.
56.
DeanS.W., DunmoreR.H., RuddockS.P., DeanJ.C., MartinC.N., & KirklandD.J. (1992). Development of assays for the detection of photomutagenicity of chemicals during exposure to UV light. II. Results of testing three sunscreen ingredients. Mutagenesis7, 179–182.
57.
ChételatA., AlbertiniS., DrespJ.H., StrobelR., & GockeE. (1999). Photomutagenesis test development. I. 8-Methoxypsoralen, chlorpromazine and sunscreen compounds in bacterial and yeast assays. Mutation Research292, 241–250.
58.
HendersonL., FedykJ., BournerC., WindebankS., FletcherS., & LovellW. (1994). Photomutagenicity assays in bacteria: factors affecting assay design and assessment of photomutagenic potential of para-aminobenzoic acid. Mutagenesis9, 459–465.
59.
NestmannE.R., BrillingerR.L., GilmanJ.P., RuddC.J., & SwierengaS.H. (1991). Recommended protocols based on a survey of current practice in genotoxicity testing laboratories. II. Mutation in Chinese hamster ovary, V79 Chinese hamster lung and L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells. Mutation Research246, 255–284.
60.
NakagawaY., WakuriS., SakamotoK., & TanakaN. (1997). The photogenotoxicity of titanium dioxide particles. Mutation Research394, 125–132.
61.
MüllerL., & KasperP. (1998). The relevance of photomutagenicity testing as a predictor of photocarcinogenicity. International Journal of Toxicology17, 551–558.
62.
GibsonN.W., HartleyJ.A., LaFranceR.J., & VaughanK. (1986). Differential cytotoxicity and DNA-damaging effects produced in human cells of the Mer+ and Mer- phenotypes by a series of 1-aryl-3-alkyltriazenes. Cancer Research46, 4999–5003.
63.
MurliH., AardemaM., LawlorT., & SpicerC. (2002). Photoclastogenicity — an improved protocol, its validation, and investigation of the photogenotoxicity of DMBA. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis40, 41–49.
64.
KalweitS., UteschD., von der HudeW., & MadleS. (1999). Chemically induced micronucleus formation in V79 cells — comparison of three different test approaches. Mutation Research439, 183–190.
65.
von der HudeW., KalweitS., EngelhardtG., McKiernanS., KasperP., Slacik-ErbenR., MiltenburgerH.G., HonarvarN., FahrigR., GorlitzB., AlbertiniS., KirchnerS., UteschD., Potter-LocherF., StopperH., & MadleS. (2000). In vitro micronucleus assay with Chinese hamster V79 cells — Results of a collaborative study with in situ exposure to 26 chemical substances. Mutation Research468, 137–163.
66.
KerstenB., ZhangJ., Brendler-SchwaabS.Y., KasperP., & MüllerL. (1999). The application of the in vitro micronucleus test in Chinese hamster V79 cells to detect drug-induced photogenotoxicity. Mutation Research445, 55–71.
67.
KerstenB., KasperP., Brendler-SchwaabS.Y., & MüllerL. (2002). Use of the photo-micronucleus assay in Chinese hamster V79 cells to study photochemical genotoxicity. Mutation Research519, 49–66.
68.
SnyderR.D., & CooperC.S. (1999). Photogenotoxicity of fluoroquinolones in Chinese hamster V79 cells: dependency on active topoisomerase II. Photochemistry and Photobiology69, 288–293.
69.
OstlingO., & JohansonK.J. (1984). Microelectrophoretic study of radiation-induced DNA damages in individual mammalian cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications123, 291–298.
70.
SinghN.P., McCoyM.T., TiceR.R., & SchneiderE.L. (1988). A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Experimental Cell Research175, 184–191.
71.
ChetelatA-A., AlbertiniS., & GockeE. (1996). The photomutagenicity of fluoroquinolones in tests for gene mutation, chromosomal aberration, gene conversion and DNA breakage (Comet assay). Mutagenesis11, 497–504.
72.
MarrotL., BelaidiJ.P., ChauboC., MeunierJ.R., PerezP., & Agapakis-CausseC. (2001). Fluoro-quinolones as chemical tools to define a strategy for photogenotoxicity in vitro assessment. Toxicology in Vitro15, 131–142.
73.
ReavyH.J., TraynorN.J., & GibbsN.K. (1997). Photogenotoxicity of skin phototumorigenic fluoro-quinolone antibiotics detected using the comet assay. Photochemistry and Photobiology66, 368–373.
74.
SelvaagE., PetersenA.B., GniadeckiR., ThornT., & WulfH-C. (2002). Phototoxicity to diuretics and antidiabetics in the cultured keratinocyte cell line HaCaT: evaluation by clonogenic assay and single cell gel electrophoresis Comet assay. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine18, 90–95.
75.
GuillotJ.P., & MartiniM.C. (1985). A new method for the assessment of phototoxic and photoallergic potentials by topical applications in the albino guinea pig. Journal of Toxicology/Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology4, 117–133.
76.
BarrattM.D., & BrownK.R. (1985). Photochemical binding of photoallergens to human serum albumin: a simple in vitro method for screening potential photoallergens. Toxicology Letters24, 1–6.
77.
LovellW.W. (1993). A scheme for in vitro screening of substances for photoallergenic potential. Toxicology in Vitro7, 95–102.
78.
UlrichP., HomeyB., & VohrH.W. (1998). A modified local lymph node assay for the differentiation of contact photoallergy from phototoxicity by analysis of cytokine expression in skin-draining lymph node cells. Toxicology125, 149–168.
79.
HomeyB., von SchillingC., BluemelJ., SchuppeH.C., RuzickaT., AhrH.J., LehmannP., & VohrH.W. (1998). An integrated model for the differentiation of chemical-induced allergic and irritant skin reactions. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology153, 83–94.
80.
VohrH-W., BlümelJ., BlotzA., HomeyB., & AhrH.J. (2000). An intra-laboratory validation of the Integrated Model for the Differentiation of Skin Reactions (IMDS): discrimination between (photo) allergic and (photo)irritant skin reactions in mice. Archives of Toxicology73, 501–509.