HartungT., & GstraunthalerG. (2000). The standardisation of cell culture procedures. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. BallsM., van ZellerA-M., & HalderM.E.), pp. 1655–1658. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
2.
HartungT., GstraunthalerG., & BallsM. (2000). Bologna Statement on Good Cell Culture Practice (GCCP). ALTEX17, 38–39.
OECD (2004). Draft Advisory Document of the OECD Working Group on GLP on the Application of GLP Principles to In Vitro Studies, 18 pp. Paris, France: OECD.
5.
SchaefferW.I. (1990). Terminology associated with cell, tissue and organ culture, molecular biology and molecular genetics. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology26, 97–101.
6.
FreshneyR.I. (2000). Culture of Animal Cells. A Manual of Basic Technique; 4th edn, 486 pp. New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Liss.
7.
Doblhoff-DierO., & StaceyG. (2000). Cell lines: applications and biosafety. In Biological Safety — Principles and Practices (ed. FlemingD.O., & HuntD.L.), 3rd edn, pp. 221–241. Washington, DC, USA: ASM Press.
8.
FrommerW., AgerB., ArcherL., BruniusG., CollinsC.H., DonikianR., FrontaliC., HampS., HouwinkE.H., KuenziM.T., KramerP., LagastH., LundS., MahlerJ.L., Normand-PlessierF., SargeantK., Tuijnenburg MuijsG., VranchS.P., & WernerR.G. (1993). Safe biotechnology recommendations for safe work with animal and human cell cultures concerning potential human pathogens. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology39, 141–147.
9.
Anon. (1980). Budapest Treaty on the International Recognition of the Deposit of Microorganisms for the Purposes of Patent Procedure of 28 April 1977, as amended on 26 September 1980. Geneva, Switzerland: World Intellectual Property Organisation. Website http://www.cnpat.com/worldlaw/treaty/budapest_en.htm.
10.
RussellW.M.S., & BurchR.L. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, 238 pp. London, UK: Methuen.
11.
van der ValkJ., MellorD., BrandsR., FischerR., GruberF., GstraunthalerG., HellebrekersL., HyllnerJ., JonkerF.H., PrietoP., ThalenM., & BaumansV. (2004). The humane collection of fetal bovine serum and possibilities for serum-free cell and tissue culture. Toxicology in Vitro18, 1–12.
12.
JochemsC.E.A., van der ValkJ.B.F., StafleuF.R., & BaumansV. (2002). The use of fetal bovine serum: ethical or scientific problem?ATLA30, 219–227.
13.
AndersonR., O'HareM., BallsM., BradyM., BrahamsD., BurtA., ChesnéC., CombesR.D., DennisonA., GarthoffB., HawskworthG., KalterE., LechatA., MayerD., RogiersV., SladowskiD., SoutheeJ., TraffordJ., van der ValkJ., & van ZellerA-M. (1998). The availability of human tissue for biomedical research. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 32. ATLA26, 763–777.
14.
Anon. (2004). Directive 2004/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells. Official Journal of the European UnionL102, 48–58.
15.
FlemingD.O., RichardsonJ.H., & TulisJ.I. (1995). Laboratory Safety: Principles and Practice, 420 pp. ASM Press.
16.
CaputoJ., CaronM., ChenT.R., CourI., HayR., MacyM., ReidY., & ThompsonA. (1992). ATCC Quality Control Methods for Cell Lines. 2nd edn, 132 pp. Manassas, VA, USA: American Type Culture Collection.
17.
CaputoJ.L. (1988). Biosafety procedures in cell culture. Journal of Tissue Culture Methods11, 223–227.
HayflickL. (1990). In the interest of clearer communication. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology26, 1–6.
27.
McKeehanW.L., BarnesD., ReidL., StanbridgeE., MurakamiH, & SatoG. (1990). Frontiers in mammalian cell culture. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology26, 9–23.
28.
NardoneR.M. (1987). Cell culture methodology from donor to cell lines. BioTechniques5, 122–127.
29.
SchaefferW.I. (1984). Usage of vertebrate, invertebrate and plant cell, tissue and organ culture terminology. In Vitro20, 19–24.
30.
SchaefferW.I. (1989). In the interest of clear communication. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology25, 389–390.
31.
StrehlR., SchumacherK., deVriesU., & MinuthW.W. (2002). Proliferating cells versus differentiated cells in tissue engineering. Tissue Engineering8, 37–42.
32.
VierckJ.L., & DodsonM.V. (2000). Interpretation of cell culture phenomena. Methods in Cell Science22, 79–81.
33.
VierckJ.L., ByrneK., MirP.S., & DodsonM.V. (2000). Ten commandments for preventing contamination of primary cell cultures. Methods in Cell Science22, 33–41.
BarnesD., McKeehanW.L., & SatoG.H. (1987). Cellular endocrinology: integrated physiology in vitro.In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology23, 659–662.
42.
BjareU. (1992). Serum-free cell culture. Pharmacology and Therapeutics53, 355–374.
43.
BottensteinJ., HayashiI., HutchingsS., MasuiH., MatherJ., McClureD.B., OhasaS., RizzinoA., SatoG., SerreroG., WolfeR., & WuR. (1979). The growth of cells in serum-free hormone-supplemented media. Methods in Enzymology58, 94–109.
44.
DefrancescoL. (1998). Serum-free cell culture: from art to science in 25 years. The Scientist12, 19–24.
45.
FroudS.J. (1999). The development, benefits and disadvantages of serum-free media. Developments in Biological Standardization99, 157–166.
46.
GstraunthalerG. (2003). Alternatives to the use of fetal bovine serum: serum-free cell culture. ALTEX20, 275–281.
47.
JaymeD.W. (1999). An animal origin perspective of common constituents of serum-free medium formulations. Developments in Biological Standardization99, 181–187.
PriceP.J., & GregoryE.A. (1982). Relationship between in vitro growth promotion and biophysical and biochemical properties of the serum supplement. In Vitro18, 576–584.
50.
ShailerC., & CorrinK. (1999). Serum supply: policies and controls operating in New Zealand. Developments in Biological Standardization99, 71–77.
51.
WessmanS.J., & LevingsR.L. (1999). Benefits and risks due to animal serum used in cell culture production. Developments in Biological Standardization99, 3–8.
52.
ZimmermannA.M., VierckJ.L., O'ReillyB.A., & DodsonM.V. (2000). Formulation of a defined medium to maintain cell health and viability in vitro.Methods in Cell Science22, 43–49.
53.
CorielL.L. (1979). Preservation, storage, and shipment. Methods in Enzymology58, 29–36.
DrexlerH.G., UphoffC.C., DirksW.G., & MacLeodR.A.F. (2002). Mix-ups and mycoplasma: the enemies within. Leukemia Research26, 329–333.
56.
FreshneyR.I. (2002). Cell line provenance. Cytotechnology39, 55–67.
57.
HayR.J. (1988). The seed stock concept and quality control for cell lines. Analytical Biochemistry171, 225–237.
58.
HayR.J., ReidY.A., McClintockP.R., ChenT.R., & MacyM.L. (1996). Cell line banks and their role in cancer research. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, Suppl. 24, 107–130.
MacLeodR.A.F., DirksW.G., MatsuoY., KaufmannM., MilchH., & DrexlerH.G. (1999). Widespread intra-species cross-contamination of human tumor cell lines arising at source. International Journal of Cancer83, 555–563.
61.
MarkovicO., & MarkovicN. (1998). Cell cross-contamination in cell cultures: the silent and neglected danger. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biolology34, 1–8.
62.
MastersJ.R.W. (2000). Human cancer cell lines: fact and fantasy. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology1, 233–236.
63.
MastersJ.R.W., TwentymanP., ArlettC., DaleyR., DavisJ., DoyleA., DyerS., FreshneyI., GalpineA., HarrisonM., HurstH., KellandL., StaceyG., StratfordI., & WardT.H. (2000). UKCCCR guidelines for the use of cell lines in cancer research. British Journal of Cancer82, 1495–1509.
64.
MastersJ.R. (2001). Short tandem repeat profiling provides an international reference standard for human cell lines. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA98, 8012–8017.
65.
MastersJ.R. (2002). HeLa cells 50 years on: the good, the bad and the ugly. Nature Reviews Cancer2, 315–319.
66.
MastersJ.R. (2002). False cell lines: the problem and a solution. Cytotechnology39, 69–74.
67.
MazurP. (1984). Freezing of living cells: mechanisms and implications. American Journal of Physiology247, C125–C142.
68.
McGarrityG.J. (1979). Detection of contamination. Methods in Enzymology58, 18–29.
69.
McGarrityG.J. (1982). Detection of mycoplasmal infection of cell cultures. Advances in Cell Culture2, 99–131.
70.
Nelson-ReesW.A., DanielsD.W., & FlandermeyerR.R. (1981). Cross-contamination of cells in culture. Science, New York212, 446–452.
71.
O'BrienS.J. (2001). Cell culture forensics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA98, 7656–7658.
72.
PetersonW.D.Jr., SimpsonW.F., & HukkuB. (1979). Cell culture characterization: monitoring for cell identification. Methods in Enzymology58, 164–178.
73.
StaceyG.N., BoltonB.J., & DoyleA. (1992). DNA fingerprinting transforms the art of cell authentication. Nature, London357, 261–262.
74.
StaceyG.N., MastersJ.R.W., HayR.J., DrexlerH.G., MacleodR.A.F., & FreshneyR.I. (2000). Cell contamination leads to inaccurate data: we must take action now. Nature, London403, 356.
75.
BarkleyW.E. (1979). Safety considerations in the cell culture laboratory. Methods in Enzymology58, 36–43.
76.
DormontD. (1999). Transmissible spongiform encephalopathy agents and animal sera. Developments in Biological Standardization99, 25–34.
77.
EliotM. (1999). Risks of virus transmission associated with animal sera or substitutes and methods of control. Developments in Biological Standardization99, 9–16.
MertenO-W. (1999). Safety issues of animal products used in serum-free media. Developments in Biological Standardization99, 167–180.
80.
MertenO-W. (2002). Virus contaminations of cell cultures: a biotechnological view. Cytotechnology39, 91–116.
81.
PetriccianiJ.C. (1998). An overview of viral and viral-like agents in cell culture systems. Cytotechnology28, 49–52.
82.
StaceyG., DoyleA., & HambletonP. (1998). Safety in Cell and Tissue Culture, 248 pp. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
83.
Anon. (1997). Information Resources for Adjuvants and Antibody Production: Comparisons and Alternative Technologies. Animal Welfare Information Centre Resource Series No. 3. Beltsville, MD, USA: Animal Welfare Information Centre, National Agricultural Library, US Department of Agriculture. Website http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/pubs/antibody.
84.
Anon. (1994). Production and Quality Control of Monoclonal Antibodies. Guideline 3AB4a, revised and adopted December 1994. 25 pp. London, UK: Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), European Medicines Evaluation Agency. (See also Concept on the Need to Revise the Guideline on Production and Quality Control of Monoclonal Antibodies (3AB4a December 1994), Reference CHMP/BWP/6404, 3 pp. London, UK: CHMP, EMEA.)
85.
AmyxH. (1987). Control of animal pain and distress in antibody production and infectious disease studies. Journal of the American Veterinary Association191, 1287–1289.1
ClarkA., BefusD., O'HashiP., HartF., SchunkM., FletchA., & GriffinG. (2002). Canadian Council on Animal Care Guidelines: Antibody Production, 43 pp. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: CCAC. Website http://www.ccac.ca1
88.
DeTollaL., & SmithJ. (2000). Guidance Document for IACUC Evaluation of Monoclonal Antibody Production Protocols, 8 pp. Jenkintown, PA, USA: Alternatives Research and Development Foundation. Website http://altweb.jhsph.edu/topics/mabs/ardf/guidance.htm1
89.
Grumstrup-ScottJ., & GreenhouseD.D. (1988). NIH intramural recommendations for the research use of complete Freund's adjuvant. ILAR News30, 9.1
90.
HanlyW.C., Taylor BennettB., & ArtwohlJ.E. (1997). Overview of Adjuvants, 5 pp. Beltsville, MD, USA: Animal Welfare Information Centre, National Agricultural Library, US Department of Agriculture. Website http://www.nal.usda.gov/awic/pubs/antibody/overview.htm1
91.
HendriksenC.F.M. (1998). A call for a European prohibition of monoclonal antibody production by the ascites procedure in laboratory animals. ATLA26, 523–540.1
92.
JacksonL.R., & FoxJ.G. (1995). Institutional policies and guidelines on adjuvants and antibody production. ILAR Journal37, 141–152.1
93.
JacksonL.R., TrudelL.J., FoxJ.G., & LipmanN.S. (1996). Evaluation of hollow fiber bioreactors as an alternative to murine ascites production for small scale monoclonal antibody production. Journal of Immunological Methods189, 217–231.1
94.
JenningsV.M. (1995). Review of selected adjuvants used in antibody production. ILAR Journal37, 119–125.1
95.
LeenarsM., ClaassenE., & HendriksenC.F.M. (1996). Considering the side-effects of adjuvant products in immunization procedures. Lab Animal25, 40–43.1
96.
MarxU., EmbletonM.J., FischerR., GruberF.P., HanssonU., HeuerJ., de LeeuwW.A., LogtenbergT., MerzW., PortetelleD., RometteJ-L., & StraughanD.W. (1997). Monoclonal antibody production. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 23. ATLA25, 121–135.1
97.
McGillM.W., & RowanA.N. (1989). Refinement of monoclonal antibody production and animal well-being. ILAR News31, 7–11.
WorkmanP., TwentymanP., BalkwillF., BalmainA., ChaplinD., DoubleJ., EmbletonJ., NewellD., RaymondR., StablesJ., StephensT, & WallaceJ. (1997). UKCCCR Guidelines for the Welfare of Animals in Experimental Neoplasia, 2nd edn, 29 pp. London, UK: UKCCCR.1
100.
Anon. (1997). Proceedings for Alternatives and Monoclonal Antibody Production, a workshop of The John Hopkins Centre and The Office for Protection from research Riaks, National Institutes for Health, 3 pp. Baltimore, MD, USA: CAAT. Website http://altweb.jhsph.edu/meetings/mab/proceedings.htm1
101.
Anon. (2002). A Code of Practice for the Production of Human-derived Therapeutic Products. Originally produced by the Medical Devices Agency, 34 pp. London, UK: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency.
102.
Cell banks, cell line authentication and identification
103.
DSMZ – German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures: