TwainM. (1981). Life on the Mississippi, 198 pp. Toronto: Bantam books.
2.
GarveyJ.B., & WidmerM.L. (1994). Beautiful Crescent: A History of New Orleans, 7th edition, chapters 3–5. New Orleans: Garmer Press.
3.
SouliéM. (1980). Le Régent, pp. 113, 326, quotation 17 (my translation). Paris: Payot.
4.
FerryL., & GerméC. (1994). Des Animaux et des Hommes, pp. 360–361. Paris, France: Librairie Générale Française.
5.
RussellW.M.S. (1995). Speech at the Awards Luncheon. In GoldbergA.M., van ZutphenL.F.M., & PrincipeM.L. (eds). The World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences: Education, Research, Testing, pp. 71–80. New York, USA: Mary Ann Liebert.
6.
Garvey & Widmer (note 2), 220, 223, 224; JarvisR., & TaverneC. (eds) (2000). Time Out Guide: New Orleans, 2nd edn, p. 39. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. 6A. After my lecture was written and recorded, I was sorry to learn that the account of Hellman's rescues was spurious. See the account of the genuine heroine Muriel Gardiner by Célia Bertin (herself a Resistance heroine) in her book La Femme à Vienne au Temps de Freud (Paris: Stock/Laurence Pernoud, 1989), 356–357.
7.
Goldberg, van Zutphen & Principe (note 5); van ZutphenL.F.M., & BallsM. (eds) (1997). Animal Alternatives, Welfare and Ethics.Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.: Balls, M., van Zeller, A-M. & Halder, M.E. (eds) (2000). Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.
8.
BakerR.M., JenkinG., & MellorD.J. (eds) (1994). Improving the Well-being of Animals in the Research Environment.Glen Osmond, Australia: ANZCCART.
9.
Červinka M., & Balls M. (eds) (1995). Alternatives to Animal Experimentation (in Czech, and English). Hradec Králové: Nucleus HK for Tempus (Hradec Králové); RussellW.M.S. (1995). The development of the Three Rs concept. ATLA23, 298–304 (Utrecht).
10.
BallsM., GoldbergA.M., FentemJ.H., BroadheadC.L., BurchR.L., FestingM.F.W., FrazierJ.M., HendriksenC.F.M., JenningsM., van der KampM.D.O., MortonD.B., RowanA.N., RussellC., RussellW.M.S., SpielmannH., StephensM.L., StokesW.S., StraughanD.W., YagerJ.D., ZurloJ., & van ZutphenB.F.M. (1995). The Three Rs: the way forward. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 11. ATLA23, 838–866.
11.
BrownF., HendriksenC., & SesardicD. (eds) (1999). Alternatives to Animals in the Development and Control of Biological Products for Human and Veterinary Use.Basel, Switzerland: Karger.
12.
ClarkD.G., LisanskyS.G., & MacmillanR. (eds) (1999). Alternatives to Animal Testing.Newbury, Berks, UK: CPL Press for COLIPA.
WorthA.P., & BallsM. (2001). The role of ECVAM in promoting the regulatory acceptance of alternative methods in the European Union. ATLA29, 525–535.
15.
StephensM.L., GoldbergA.M., & RowanA.N. (2001). The first forty years of the alternatives approach: Refining, reducing and replacing the use of laboratory animals. In The State of the Animals 2001 (ed. SalemD.J., & RowanA.N.), pp. 121–135. Washington, DC, USA: Humane Society Press.
16.
WickensS.M. (2001). Science in the Service of Animal Welfare.Wheathampstead, Herts, UK: UFAW.
17.
StevensC. (2001). Letter from the President. Animal Welfare Institute Quarterly Commemorative Issue, p. 2. Washington, DC, USA: Animal Welfare Institute.
18.
RussellW.M.S., & BurchR.L. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, p. xiii. London, UK: Methuen.
19.
StephensM.L., GoldbergA.M., & RowanA.N. (note 15), p. 124.
20.
StephensM.L., GoldbergA.M., & RowanA.N. (note 15), p. 126.
21.
Anon. (2001). ZEBET database on alternatives to animal experiments. ANZCCART News14 (2), 10.
22.
KurodaY.Development in alternatives and animal use in Japan. In van Zutphen & Balls (note 7), pp. 145–150.
23.
De GreeveP., & De LeeuwW.Developments in alternatives and animal use in Europe. In van Zutphen & Balls (note 7), pp. 127–136.
24.
Anon. (2000). Formation of the Spanish network for alternatives to animal experimentation (REMA). NCA Newsletter9, 8; Anon. (2000). Spanish network for alternatives to animal experimentation. FRAME News51, 9.
25.
Anon. (2000). Cuban visitors. FRAME News50, 6; Perez, L.U. & Murillo, G. Promotion of alternative methods in Latin America and the Caribbean: challenges and hopes. In Balls, van Zeller & Halder (note 7), pp. 1395–1400.
26.
ZhengmingH. (2001). The current status of alternatives to animal experiments in China. ANZCCART News14 (2), 5–6.
27.
RogiersV., De GreeveP., & GarthoffB.The role of national platforms. In Balls, van Zeller & Halder (note 7), pp. 1713–1718.
28.
Anon. (1999). Launching of the Belgian Platform for Alternative Methods (BPAM). NCA Newsletter7, 6–7; Beken, S. & Rogiers, V. The Belgian Platform for Alternative Methods (BPAM). In Clark, Lisansky & Macmillan (note 12), p. 266.
29.
LibowitzL.A. (1999). Letter from CAAT. ATLA27, 509–513.
30.
SchwindamanD. (1998). Animal Welfare Information Center: A historical survey of significant events (1986–present) and a glimpse of the future. In KregerM., JensenD., & AllenT. (eds) Animal Welfare Act 1966–1996: Historical Perspectives and Future Directions, pp. 49–58. Riverdale, MD, USA: WARDS.
31.
KregerM. (1997). Why conduct literature searches for alternatives?ASLAP Newsletter30 (3), 19–23.
32.
van ZutphenL.F.M. (1994). Animal use and alternatives: developments in the Netherlands. In ReinhardtC.A. (ed.) Alternatives to Animal Testing: New Ways in the Biomedical Sciences, Trends and Progress, pp. 57–65. Weinheim, Germany: VCH; van Zutphen, L.F.M. (1991). Education and animal experimentation. In Hendriksen, C.F.M. & Koëter, H.B.W.M. (eds) Replacement, Reduction and Refinement. Present Possibilities and Future Prospects, pp. 119–125. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.; van Zutphen, L.F.M. & van der Valk, J.B.F. (1995). Education and training: a basis for the introduction of the Three Rs alternatives into animal research. ATLA 23, 123–127.
33.
van ZutphenL.F.M., BaumansV., & BeynenA.C. (eds) (1993). Principles of Laboratory Animal Science: a Contribution to the Humane Use and Care of Animals and to the Quality of Experimental Results.Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V.
34.
Anon. (2000). Professor of alternatives appointed at the NCA. NCA Newsletter9, 7.
35.
The Three Rs Declaration of Bologna, and background to the Declaration (prepared by the Congress Executive Committee) (2000). In Balls, van Zeller & Halder (note 7), pp. 15–22, reprinted in ATLA28, 1–5, and as a separate pamphlet.
36.
Anon. (2000). European Science Foundation Policy Briefing: use of animals in research. ATLA28, 743–749.
37.
SmithR. (2001). Animal research: the need for a middle ground; let's promote the Three Rs of animal research: replacement, reduction and refinement (editorial). British Medical Journal322, 248–250.
38.
MenacheA. (2000). A Proposal to amend the Declaration of Helsinki. In Balls, van Zeller & Halder (note 7), pp. 23–24; Anon (2001). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: “Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects”, Revised. NCA Newsletter10, 11.
39.
RowanA.N.Looking back 33 years to Russell and Burch: the development of the concept of the Three Rs (Alternatives). In Reinhardt (note 32), pp. 1–11.
40.
Stephens, Goldberg & Rowan (note 15).
41.
McArdleJ. (2001). United States laboratory animal protection laws: an evolving process. NCA Newsletter11, 11–13; Combes, R. (2001). Why the US Department of Agriculture should be allowed to insist on inclusion of rodents and birds in the Animal Welfare Act. ATLA 29, 85–88. The song is based on Lord Tolloller's “Blue Blood” aria in the first Act of Iolanthe. The case of the dinosaurs is in dispute, but I claim poetic licence.
42.
Anon. (2001). Agony of animals at Amgen. Animal Welfare Institute Quarterly50, no. 3, 16.
43.
HarknessJ.E. (2000). Corners still unswept. In VaupelS.S. (ed.) Definition of Pain and Distress and Reporting Requirements for Laboratory Animals, pp. 71–76. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press.
44.
RussellW.M.S. (2002). Three wars that never happened. Medicine, Conflict and Survival18, 23–33. 44A. After my lecture was written and recorded, I was appalled to learn from Dr Andrew Rowan that Congress had very recently decided to continue withdrawing protection from rats, mice and birds, so from an estimated 95% of American laboratory animals. We can only hope that wise counsels will prevail, and that this decision, so harmful for animals and for American biomedical science (since it officially sanctions scientifically worthless experiments) will be reversed as soon as possible. I have let my original passage stand, not only for Sophoclean irony, but because I believe my remarks acquire greater force in these unhappy circumstances.
45.
Russell (note 5), pp. 73–74.
46.
RichmondC. (2002). Annual Meeting: Welfare and Science. Research Defence Society News, January, 8–9.
47.
OrreniusS. (1991). Molecular mechanisms of cell death. In JiS. (ed.) Molecular Theories of Cell Life and Death, pp. 373–383. New Brunswick, NJ, USA: Rutgers University Press; Castell, J.V. & Doehmer, J. Session summary: metabolism-mediated effects. In Balls, van Zeller & Halder (note 7), pp. 125–126; Gomez-Lechon, M.J., Ponsoda, X., Bort, R. & Castell, J.V. (2001). The use of cultured hepatocytes to investigate the metabolism of drugs and mechanisms of drug hepatotoxicity. ATLA 29, 251–257.
48.
OrreniusS. (1991). Molecular mechanisms of cell death. In JiS. (ed.) Molecular Theories of Cell Life and Death, p. 251.
49.
van GompelJ. (2000). Development of human renal and hepatic co-culture in vitro systems for immunotoxicity testing: an overview of available co-culture methods. In Balls, van Zeller & Halder (note 7), pp. 231–236.
50.
MaierP., MilosevicN., & BruininkA.Co-cultures: mimicry of cellular interactions within a tissue and between organs — consequences for toxicity testing. In Balls, van Zeller & Halder (note 7), pp. 249–256; Bruinink, A. & Maier, P. (2000). Identification of neurotoxic chemicals in cell cultures. 3R-Info-Bulletin 13.
51.
VreugdenhilE. (2001). Glucocorticoid-mediated cell death in neuronal cell lines: an alternative model system to study neurodegenerative processes. NCA Newsletter11, 4–6.
52.
PardoB., & HoneggerP.Evaluation of aggregating brain cell cultures as a model for studying ischaemia-related neurodegenerative processes. In Balls, van Zeller & Halder (note 7), pp. 241–247; Honegger, P. & Pardo, B. (2000). Aggregating brain cell cultures: investigation of stroke-related brain damage. 3R-Info-Bulletin 15.
53.
BuijsR.M., van der VlietJ., & DaiJ.P. (2001). In vitro tracing: a tool to study local interconnections in the rat and human brain. NCA Newsletter10, 6–7.
54.
GreenfieldR.E., KronmanC., & MooreD.H. (1997/1998). Reducing animal research at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Chemical Defense. Animal Welfare information Center Newsletter8 (3 & 4), 6–7.
55.
BannonD.I., PortnoyM.E., LeesP.S.J., CulottaV.C., & BreslerJ.P. (2001). In vitro systems to study transport of lead. In LibowitzL., & HowardC.J. (eds) 20th Anniversary of CAAT, p. 9. Baltimore, MD, USA: CAAT.
56.
EllisC. (2002). Model behaviour. Drug Discovery (Nature Reviews)1, 6.
57.
BrazilM. (2002). And Fashionable Screening. Drug Discovery1, 6.
58.
HoltzmanS. (2000). In Silico Toxicology. In IsfortR.J., & LederbergJ. (eds) Toxicology for the Next Millennium, pp. 68–74. New York, USA: New York Academy of Sciences.
59.
Anon. (2001). Use your PC to beat cancer. Oxford Today13 (3), 4.
60.
ZhangJ.Y. (2002). Apoptosis-based anti-cancer drugs. Drug Discovery1, 101.
61.
ČervinkaM., & PůžaV. (1995). Apoptosis and necrosis: dynamics of structural changes in cells cultivated in vitro after treatment with xenobiotics. Toxicology in Vitro9, 387–396.
62.
van der ValkJ. (1997). NCA symposium on the use of human material as an alternative to animal experiments. ATLA25, 589–593.
63.
Anon. (2000). The Peterborough Hospital Human Tissue Bank. FRAME News49, 7.
64.
Anon. (2000). Three replacement alternative methods accepted by the European Union. ATLA28, 237; Anon. (2000). Three replacement alterative methods accepted by the European Union. FRAME News49, 1–2.
65.
Anon. (2000). EPA, OSHA and CPSC accept non-animal system for screening chemicals: skin corrosiveness. NCA Newsletter9, 9; Anon. (2000). Suffering to be reduced. FRAME News49, 2.
66.
RichmondJ. (2000). The Three Rs: a journey or a destination?ATLA28, 761–773.
67.
SpielmannH. (2001). International cooperation: an essential requirement for replacing animal toxicity tests. ATLA29, 637–646.
68.
FestingM.F.W. (2001). Guidelines for the design and statistical analysis of experiments in papers submitted to ATLA.ATLA29, 427–433.
69.
RussellW.M.S. (1995). The development of the Three Rs concept. ATLA23, 298–304.
70.
Anon. (2002). The FRAME Reduction Committee. FRAME News54, 12–13.
71.
FestingM.F.W.Reduction in animal use in the production and testing of biologicals. In Brown, Hendriksen & Sesardic (note 11), pp. 195–200; Reduction, model development and efficient experimental design. In Balls, van Zeller & Halder (note 7), pp. 721–727; Common errors in the statistical analysis of experimental data. In Brown, Hendriksen & Sesardic (note 11). pp. 753–758; Genetically and microbiologically defined laboratory animals (2001). Reduction (Third Special Report), FRAME News, 9–10.
72.
Russell & Burch (note 18), pp. 111–112, 221.
73.
FestingM.F.W.Reduction, model development and efficient experimental design. In Balls, van Zeller & Halder (note 7), pp. 721–727; Waterton, J.C., Middleton, B.J., Pickford, R., Allot, C.P., Checkley, D. & Keith, R.A. Reduced animal use in efficacy testing in disease models with use of sequential experimental designs. In Balls, van Zeller & Halder (note 7), pp. 737–745.
74.
ChanceM.R.A., & RussellW.M.S. (1997). The benefits of giving experimental animals the best possible environment. In ReinhardtV. (ed.) Comfortable Quarters for Laboratory Animals (eighth edition), pp. 12–14. Washington, DC, USA: Animal Welfare Institute.
75.
PooleT., & EnglishP. (eds) (1999). The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals (seventh edition). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science (2 volumes).
76.
ReinhardtV., & ReinhardtA. (eds) (2000). Comfortable Quarters for Laboratory Animals (ninth edition). Washington, DC, USA: Animal Welfare Institute.
77.
RussellW.M.S.The ill effects of uncomfortable quarters. In Reinhardt & Reinhardt (note 76), pp. 18–26.
78.
CarltonD.L., & RichardsW. (2002). Affordable noise control in a laboratory animal facility. Lab Animal31, 47–48.
79.
InhelderE. (1962). Skizzen zu einer Verhaltenspathologie reaktiver Störungen bei Tieren. Schweizer Archiv für Neurologie, Neurochirurgie und Psychiatrie.89, 276–326.
80.
e.g. Mice: van de WeerdH.A. (1996). Environmental Enrichment for Laboratory Mice: Preferences and Consequences. Doctoral Thesis, University of Utrecht; Jennings, M. et al. (1998). Refining rodent husbandry: the mouse. Laboratory Animals32, 233–259; van de Weerd, H.A. & Baumans, V. (1999). Evaluation of environmental enrichment for laboratory mice. Animal Welfare Information Center Bulletin 9 (3 & 4), 1-2, 18–19. Gerbils: Waiblinger, E. & Konig, B. (2001). Housing and husbandry conditions affect stereotypic behaviour in laboratory gerbils. 3R-Info-Bulletin16. Rabbits: Morton, D.B. et al. (1993). Refinements in rabbit husbandry. Laboratory Animals27, 301–329. Cats: Loveridge, G.G. Comfortable environmentally enriched housing for domestic cats. In Reinhardt (note 74), pp. 55–62; Gray, S. (2001). Environmental enrichment for cats. ATLA 29, 3. Primates: D.H.R. Harris (1989). Environmental enrichment and its effects on the individual. In UFAW (ed.) Laboratory Animal Welfare Research: Primates, pp. 15–16. Potters Bar, Herts, UK: UFAW; Scott, L. Environmental enrichment for marmosets and rhesus monkeys. Laboratory Animal Welfare Research: Primates, pp. 26–30; Reinhardt, V. (1996/1997). The Wisconsin Gnawing Stick. Animal Welfare Information Center Newsletter 7 (3 & 4), 11; Reinhardt, V. & Reinhardt, A. (2001). Environmental Enrichment for Caged Rhesus Macaques: a Photographic Documentation and Literature Review (second edition). Washington, DC, USA: Animal Welfare Institute.
81.
RussellC., & RussellW.M.S. (1985). Conflict activities in monkeys. Social Biology and Human Affairs50, 26–48.
82.
van LooP.L.P., Male Management: Coping with Aggression Problems in Male Laboratory Mice (Doctoral thesis, University of Utrecht, 2001).
83.
There are references to eight publications of Phyllis Croft in Russell & Burch (note 18), p. 203.
84.
FlecknellP.A. (1987). Laboratory Animal Anaesthesia: an Introduction for Research Workers and Technicians.London, UK: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
85.
e.g. FlecknellP. (1997/1998). Assessment and alleviation of post-operative pain. Animal Welfare Information Center Newsletter8 (3 & 4), 8–14; Pain assessment, alleviation and avoidance in laboratory animals. ANZCCART News12 (4), Facts Sheet Insert, 1–8.
86.
Baker, Jenkin & Mellor (note 8); Vaupel (note 43); FlecknellP., & Waterman-PearsonA. (eds) (2000). Pain Management in Animals.London, UK: W.B. Saunders; Lord Soulsby & Morton (eds) (2001). Pain: its Nature and Management in Man and Animals. London, UK: Royal Society of Medicine Press.
87.
JonesR. (2002). Orphan's pain. Drug Discovery1, 255.
88.
DeHavenW.R.Pain and distress: USDA perspective. In Vaupel (note 43), pp. 3–8.
89.
MenchJ. (1999). Defining endpoints: the role of the animal care committee. In HendriksenC.F.M., & MortonD.B. (eds) Humane Endpoints in Animal Experiments for Biomedical Research, pp. 133–138. London, UK: Royal Society of Medicine Press.
90.
Hendriksen & Morton (note 89).
91.
Based on Sir Joseph Porter's aria in the First Act of H.M.S. Pinafore by W.S. Gilbert & A. Sullivan.