TrevanJ.W. (1927). The error of determination of toxicity. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, Series B101, 483–514.
3.
OECD (1987). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, No. 401: Acute Oral Toxicity, 7 pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
4.
DienerW., SicchaL., MischkeU., KayserD., & SchledeE. (1994). The biometric evaluation of the acute toxic class method (oral). Archives of Toxicology68, 599–610.
5.
SchledeE., MischkeU., DienerW., & KayserD. (1995). The international validation study of the acute toxic class method (oral). Archives of Toxicology69, 659–670.
6.
OECD (1996). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, No. 423: Acute Oral Toxicity — Acute Toxic Class Method, 14 pp. (Updated in 2001.) Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
7.
BruceR.D. (1985). An up-and-down procedure for acute toxicity testing. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology6, 151–157.
8.
LipnickR.L., CotruvoJ.A., HilN., BruceR.D., StitzelK.A., WalkerA.P., ChuI., GoddardM., SegalL., SpringerJ.A., & MyersR.C. (1995). Comparison of the up-and-down, conventional LD50, and fixed-dose acute toxicity procedures. Food and Chemical Toxicology33, 223–231.
9.
Van den HeuvelM.J., ClarkD.G., FielderR., KoundakjianP.P., OliverG.J.A., PellingD., TomlinsonN.J., & WalkerA.P. (1990). The international validation of a fixed-dose procedure as an alternative to the classical LD50 test. Food and Chemical Toxicology28, 469–482.
10.
OECD (1992). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, No. 420: Acute Oral Toxicity — Fixed Dose Method, 7 pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
11.
BallsM., & FentemJ.H. (1993). The on-going process to replace the LD50 test. Humane Innovations and Alternatives7, 544–547.
12.
EkwallB. (1983). Correlation between cytotoxicity in vitro and LD50 values. Acta Pharmacologica et Toxicologica52, Suppl. 2, 80–99.
13.
ClothierR.H., HulmeL.M., SmithM., & BallsM. (1987). Comparison of the in vitro toxicities of 59 chemicals. Molecular Toxicology1, 571–577.
14.
PhillipsJ.C., GibsonW.B., YamJ., AldenC.L., & HardG. (1990). Survey of the QSAR and in vitro approaches for developing non-animal methods to supersede the in vivo LD50 test. Food and Chemical Toxicology28, 375–394.
15.
FryJ.R., GarleM.J., HammondA.H., & HatfieldA. (1990). Correlation of acute lethal potency with in vitro cytotoxicity. Toxicology in Vitro4, 175–178.
16.
ShrivastavaR., DelomenieC., ChevalierA., JohnG., EkwallB., WalumE., & MassinghamR. (1992). Comparison of in vivo acute lethal potency and in vitro cytotoxicity of 48 chemicals. Cell Biology and Toxicology8, 157–170.
17.
GarleM.J., FentemJ.H., & FryJ.R. (1994). In vitro cytotoxicity tests for the prediction of acute toxicity in vivo.Toxicology in Vitro8, 1303–1313.
18.
BlaauboerB.J., BarrattM.D., & HoustonJ.B. (1999). The integrated use of alternative methods in toxicological risk evaluation. ATLA27, 229–237.
19.
ICCVAM (2001). Report of the International Workshop on In Vitro Methods for Assessing Acute Systemic Toxicity. ICCVAM–NICEATM workshop, Arlington, VA, USA, October 17–20, 2000. NIH Publication No. 01-4499, 370 pp. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: NIEHS. Website http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/ (Accessed 11.10.04).
20.
SeibertH., BallsM., FentemJ.H., BianchiV., ClothierR.H., DierickxP.J., EkwallB., GarleM.J., Gómez-LechónM.J., GribaldoL., GuldenM., LiebschM., RasmussenE., RoguetR., ShrivastavaR., & WalumE. (1996). Acute toxicity testing in vitro and the classification and labelling of chemicals. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 16. ATLA24, 499–510.
21.
Anon. (1967). Council Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. Official Journal of the European CommunitiesP196, 1–98.
22.
Anon. (1993). Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 of 23 March 1993 on the evaluation and control of the risks of existing substances. Official Journal of the European CommunitiesL84, 1–75.
23.
Anon. (1991). Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market. Official Journal of the European CommunitiesL230, 1–32.
24.
Anon. (1998). Council Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. Official Journal of the European CommunitiesL123, 1–63.
25.
Anon. (1992). Council Directive 92/32/EEC of 30 April 1992 amending for the seventh time Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. Official Journal of the European CommunitiesL154, 1–29.
Anon. (1994). Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 of 28 June 1994 laying down the principles for the assessment of risks to man and the environment of existing substances in accordance with Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93. Official Journal of the European CommunitiesL161, 3–11.
28.
Anon. (2003). Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment in Support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for New Notified Substances, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for Existing Substances and Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Placing of Biocidal Products on the Market, EUR 20418 EN, 1008 pp. Website http://ecb.jrc.it (Accessed 20.10.04).
29.
European Commission (2003). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), Establishing a European Chemicals Agency and Amending Directive 1999/45/EC and Regulation (EC) {on Persistent Organic Pollutants} and Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Council Directive 67/548/EEC in Order to Adapt it to Regulation (EC) of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals, COM(2003) 644 final, 158 pp. Website http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/pdf/2003/com2003_0644en.html (Accessed 11.10.04).
30.
AllanouR., HansenB.G., & van der BiltY. (1999). Public Availability of Data on EU High Production Volume Chemicals, EUR 18996 EN, 21 pp. Website http://ecb.jrc.it (Accessed 11.10.04).
31.
PedersenF., de BruijnJ., MunnS., & van LeeuwenK. (2003). Assessment of Additional Testing Needs under REACH. Effects of (Q)SARS, Risk Based Testing and Voluntary Industry Initiatives, EUR 20863 EN, 36 pp. Website http://ihcp.jrc.cec.eu.int/ (Accessed 11.10.04).
32.
Anon. (2003). 40 CFR 152. 2003. Title 40: Protection of Environment Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. Part 152: Pesticide Registration and Classification Procedures21, 6–43. Washington, DC, USA: Government Printing Office.
33.
Anon. (2003). 40 CFR 156. 2003. Title 40: Protection of Environment Agency. Code of Federal Regulations. Part 156: Labeling Requirements for Pesticides and Devices21, 56–73. Washington, DC, USA: Government Printing Office.
34.
Anon. (2003). 49 CFR 173. 2003. Title 49: Department of Transportation. Code of Federal Regulations. Part 173: Shippers — General Requirements for Shipments and Packagings2, 404–638. Washington, DC, USA: Government Printing Office.
35.
Anon. (2003). Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), ST/SG/AC.10/30, 443 pp. New York, NY, USA and Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations. Website http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/officialtext.html (Accessed 11.10.04).
36.
HalleW. (2003). The Registry of Cytotoxicity: toxicity testing in cell cultures to predict acute toxicity (LD50) and to reduce animal testing. ATLA31, 89–198.
37.
ParchmentR. (2000). Oncology clinical trials and in vitro prediction models for xenobiotic toxicology. Developments in Animal and Veterinary Sciences A31, 693–708.
38.
ZbindenG., & Flury-RoversiM. (1981). Significance of the LD50-test for the toxicological evaluation of chemical substances. Archives of Toxicology47, 77–99.
39.
GribaldoL., BuerenJ., DeldarA., HoklandP., MeredithC., MonetaD., MosessoP., ParchmentR., Parent-MassinD., PessinaA., San RomanJ., & SchoetersG. (1996). The use of in vitro systems for evaluating haematotoxicity. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 14. ATLA24, 211–231.
40.
PessinaA., AlbellaB., BuerenJ., BrantomP., CasatiS., GribaldoL., CroeraC., GagliardiG., FotiP., ParchmentR., Parent-MassinD., SibirilY., & Van Den HeuvelR. (2001). Prevalidation of a model for predicting acute neutropenia by colony forming unit granulocyte/macrophage (CFU-GM) assay. Toxicology in Vitro15, 729–740.
41.
PessinaA., AlbellaB., BayoM., BuerenJ., BrantomP., CasatiS., CroeraC., GagliardiG., FotiP., ParchmentR., Parent-MassinD., SchoetersG., SibirilY., Van Den HeuvelR., & GribaldoL. (2003). Application of the CFU-GM assay to predict acute drug-induced neutropenia: an international blind trial to validate a prediction model for the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of myelosuppressive xenobiotics. Toxicological Sciences75, 355–367.
42.
ClemedsonC., Nordin-AnderssonM., BjerregaardH.F., ClausenJ., ForsbyA., GustafssonH., HanssonU., IsomaaB., JørgensenC., KolmanA., KotovaN., KrauseG., KristenU., KurppaK., RomertL., & ScheersE. (2002). Development of an in vitro test battery for the estimation of acute human systemic toxicity: an outline of the EDIT project. ATLA30, 313–321.
43.
ClemedsonC., McFarlane-AbdullaE., AnderssonM., BarileF.A., CallejaM.C., ChesnéC., ClothierR., CottinM., CurrenR., Daniel-SzolgayE., DierickxP., FerroM., FiskesjöG., Garza-OcañasL., Gómez-LechónM.J., GüldenM., IsomaaB., JanusJ., JudgeP., KahruA., KempR.B., KerszmanG., KristenU., KunimotoM., KärenlampiS., LavrijsenK., LewanL., LiliusH., OhnoT., PersooneG., RoguetR., RomertL., SawyerT.W., SeibertH., ShrivastavaR., StammatiA., TanakaN., Torres-AlanisO., VossJ-U., WakuriS., WalumE., WangX., ZuccoF., & EkwallB. (1996). MEIC evaluation of acute systemic toxicity. Part I. Methodology of 68 in vitro toxicity assays used to test the first 30 reference chemicals. ATLA24, Suppl. 1, 251–272.
44.
ClemedsonC., McFarlane-AbdullaE., AnderssonM., BarileF.A., CallejaM.C., ChesnéC., ClothierR., CottinM., CurrenR., DierickxP., FerroM., FiskesjöG., Garza-OcañasL., Gómez-LechónM.J., GüldenM., IsomaaB., JanusJ., JudgeP., KahruA., KempR.B., KerszmanG., KristenU., KunimotoM., KärenlampiS., LavrijsenK., LewanL., LiliusH., MalmstenA., OhnoT., PersooneG., PetterssonR., RoguetR., RomertL., SandbergM., SawyerT.W., SeibertH., ShrivastavaR., SjöströmM., StammatiA., TanakaN., Torres-AlanisO., VossJ-U., WakuriS., WalumE., WangX., ZuccoF., & EkwallB. (1996). MEIC evaluation of acute systemic toxicity. Part II. In vitro results from 68 toxicity assays used to test the first 30 reference chemicals and a comparative cytotoxicity analysis. ATLA24, Suppl. 1, 273–311.
45.
ClemedsonC., BarileF.A., EkwallB., Gómez-LechónM.J., HallT., ImaiK., KahruA., LogemannP., MonacoF., OhnoT., SegnerH., SjöströmM., ValentinoM., WalumE., WangX., & EkwallB. (1998). MEIC evaluation of acute systemic toxicity. Part III. In vitro results from 16 additional methods used to test the first 30 reference chemicals and a comparative cytotoxicity analysis. ATLA26, Suppl. 1, 93–129.
46.
ClemedsonC., AnderssonM., AokiY., BarileF.A., BassiA.M., CallejaM.C., CastanoA., ClothierR.H., DierickxP., EkwallB., FerroM., FiskesjöG., Garza-OcañasL., Gómez-LechónM.J., GüldenM., HallT., ImaiK., IsomaaB., KahruA., KerszmanG., KjellstrandP., KristenU., KunimotoM., KärenlampiS., LewanL., LiliusH., LoukianovA., MonacoF., OhnoT., PersooneG., RomertL., SawyerT.W., SegnerH., SeibertH., ShrivastavaR., SjöströmM., StammatiA., TanakaN., ThuvanderA., Torres-AlanisO., ValentinoM., WakuriS., WalumE., WangX., WieslanderA., ZuccoF., & EkwallB. (1998). MEIC evaluation of acute systemic toxicity. Part IV. In vitro results from 67 toxicity assays used to test reference chemicals 31–50 and a comparative cytotoxicity analysis. ATLA26, Suppl. 1, 131–183.
47.
EkwallB., ClemedsonC., CrafoordB., EkwallB., HallanderS., WalumE., & BondessonI. (1998). MEIC evaluation of acute systemic toxicity. Part V. Rodent and human toxicity data for the 50 reference chemicals. ATLA26, Suppl. 2, 571–616.
48.
EkwallB., BarileF.A., CastanoA., ClemedsonC., ClothierR.H., DierickxP., EkwallB., FerroM., FiskesjöG., Garza-OcañasL., Gómez-LechónM.J., GüldenM., HallT., IsomaaB., KahruA., KerszmanG., KristenU., KunimotoM., KärenlampiS., LewanL., LoukianovA., OhnoT., PersooneG., RomertL., SawyerT.W., ShrivastavaR., SegnerH., StammatiA., TanakaN., ValentinoM., WalumE., & ZuccoF. (1998). MEIC evaluation of acute systemic toxicity. Part VI. The prediction of human toxicity by rodent LD50 values and results from 61 in vitro methods. ATLA26, Suppl. 2, 617–658.
49.
ClemedsonC., BarileF.A., ChesnéC., CottinM., CurrenR., EkwallB., FerroM., Gómez-LechónM.J., ImaiK., JanusJ., KempR.B., KerszmanG., KjellstrandP., LavrijsenK., LogemannP., McFarlane-AbdullaE., RoguetR., SegnerH., ThuvanderA., WalumE., & EkwallB. (2000). MEIC evaluation of acute systemic toxicity. Part VII. Prediction of human toxicity by results from testing of the first 30 reference chemicals with 27 further in vitro assays. ATLA28, Suppl. 1, 161–200.
50.
EkwallB., EkwallB., & SjöströmM. (2000). MEIC evaluation of acute systemic toxicity. Part VIII. Multivariate partial least squares evaluation, including the selection of a battery of cell line tests with a good prediction of human acute lethal peak blood concentrations for 50 chemicals. ATLA28, Suppl. 1, 201–234.
51.
HalleW., & SpielmannS. (1992). Two procedures for the prediction of acute toxicity (LD50) from cytotoxicity data. ATLA20, 40–49.
52.
ICCVAM (2001). Guidance Document on Using In Vitro Data to Estimate In Vivo Starting Dose for Acute Toxicity. NIH Publication No. 01-4500, 102 pp. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: NIEHS. Website http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/ (Accessed 11.10.04).
53.
BorenfreundE., & PuernerJ. (1984). A simple quantitative procedure using monolayer cultures for cytotoxicity assays (HTD/NR-90). Journal of Tissue Culture Methods9, 7–9.
54.
BoisonS., & EggumB.O. (1991). Critical evaluation of in vitro methods for estimating digestibility in simple-stomach animals. Nutrition Research Reviews4, 141–162.
55.
KrulC., Luiten-SchuiteA., BaandaggerR., VerhagenH., MohnG., FeronV., & HavenaarR. (2000). Application of a dynamic in vitro gastrointestinal model to study the availability of food mutagens, using heterocyclic aromatic amines as model compounds. Food and Chemical Toxicology38, 783–792.
56.
VerweiM., ArkbageK., HavenaarR., van den BergH., WitthoftC., & SchaafsmaG. (2003). Folic acid and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate in fortified milk are bioaccessible as determined in a dynamic in vitro gastrointestinal model. Journal of Nutrition133, 2377–2383.
57.
ArturssonP., & KarlssonJ. (1991). Correlation between oral drug absorption in humans and apparent drug permeability coefficients in human intestinal epithelial (Caco-2) cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications175, 880–885.
58.
VersantvoortC.H.M., OnderwaterR.C.A., DuizerE., van de SandtJ.J.M., GildeA.J., & GrotenJ.P. (2002). Monolayers of IEC-18 cells as an in vitro model for screening the passive transcellular and paracellular transport across the intestinal barrier: composition of active and passive transport with the human colon carcinoma Caco-2 cell line. Journal of Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology11, 335–344.
59.
HeringaM.B., PastorD., AlgraJ., VaesW.H.J., & HermensJ.L.M. (2002). Negligible depletion solid-phase microextraction with radio-labeled analytes to study free concentrations and protein binding: an example with [3H]estradiol. Analytical Chemistry74, 5993–5997.
60.
HermensJ.L.M., & VaesW.H.J. (2002). Characterization of analyte binding and freely dissolved concentrations in environmental and biological materials. In Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 37 (ed. PawliszynJ.), pp. 241–252. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
61.
BlaauboerB.J., BaylissM.K., CastellJ.V., EveloC.T.A., FrazierJ.M., GroenK., GüldenM., GuillouzoA., HissinkA.M., HoustonJ.B., JohansonG., de JonghJ., KedderisG.L., ReinhardtC.A., van de SandtJ.J.M., & SeminoG. (1996). The use of biokinetics and in vitro methods in toxicological risk evaluation. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 15. ATLA24, 473–497.
62.
BlaauboerB.J. (2001). Toxicodynamic modelling and the interpretation of in vitro toxicity data. Toxicology Letters120, 111–123.
63.
BogaardsJ.J.P., FreidigA.P., & van BladerenP.J. (2001). Prediction of isoprene diepoxide levels in vivo in mouse, rat and man using enzyme kinetic data in vitro and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling. Chemico-Biological Interactions138, 247–265.
64.
Van OmmenB., de JonghJ., van de SandtJ., BlaauboerB., HissinkE., BogaardsJ., & van BladerenP. (1995). Computer-aided biokinetic modelling combined with in vitro data. Toxicology in Vitro9, 537–542.
65.
SweetmanS.C. ed. (2004). Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference, 34th edn, 2768 pp. London, UK: Pharmaceutical Press.