Anon. (2003). Directive 2003/15/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 February 2003 amending Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European UnionL66, 26–35.
4.
KusuharaH., & SugiyamaY. (2001). Efflux transport systems for drugs at the blood–brain barrier and blood–cerebrospinal fluid barrier (part 1). Drug Discovery Today6, 150–156.
5.
FengM.R. (2002). Assessment of blood–brain barrier penetration: in silico, in vitro and in vivo.Current Drug Metabolism3, 647–657.
6.
NitzT., EisenblätterT., HaselbachM., & GallaH-J. (2001). Recent advances in the development of cell culture models for the blood–brain- and blood–CSF-barrier. In Blood–Brain Barrier Delivery and Brain Pathology (ed. KluwerJ.L.), pp. 45–62. New York, NJ, USA: Plenum Press.
7.
HaselbachM., WegenerJ., DeckerS., EngelbertzC., & GallaH-J. (2001). Porcine choroid plexus epithelial cells in culture: regulation of barrier properties and transport processes. Microscopy Research and Technique52, 137–152.
8.
StrazielleN., & Ghersi-EgeaJ-F. (1999). Demonstration of a couplet metabolism–efflux process at the choroid plexus as a mechanism of brain protection towards xenobiotics. Journal of Neuroscience19, 6275–6289.
9.
SavettieriG., Di LiegroI., CataniaC., LicataL., PitarresiG.L., D'AgostinoS., SchieraG., De CaroV., GiandaliaG., GiannolaL.I., & CestelliA. (2000). Neurons and ECM regulate occluding localization in brain endothelial cells. Molecular Neuroreceptors11, 1081–1084.
10.
BauerH.C., & BauerH. (2000). Neural induction of the blood–brain barrier: still an enigma. Cell and Molecular Neurobiology20, 13–28.
11.
de VriesH.E., KuiperJ., de BoerA.G., van BerkelJ.C., & BreimerD.D. (1997). The blood–brain barrier in neuroinflammatory diseases. Pharmacological Reviews49, 143–155.
12.
GrantG.A., AbbottN.J., & JanigroD. (1998). Understanding the physiology of the blood–brain barrier: in vitro models. News in Physiological Sciences13, 287–293.
13.
AndersenM.E. (1991). Physiological modelling of organic compounds. Annals of Occupational Hygiene35, 309–321.
14.
PoulinP., & KrishnanK. (1996). A tissue composition-based algorithm for predicting tissue: air partition coefficients of organic chemicals. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology136, 126–130.
15.
DeJonghJ., VerhaarH.J., & HermensJ.L. (1998). Role of kinetics in acute lethality of nonreactive volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Toxicological Sciences45, 26–32.
16.
MeulenbergC.J., & VijverbergH.P. (2000). Empirical relations predicting human and rat tissue: air partition coefficients of volatile organic compounds. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology165, 206–216.
17.
WorthA.P., & BallsM. eds (2002). Alternative (Nonanimal) Methods for Chemicals Testing: Current Status and Future Prospects. A report prepared by ECVAM and the ECVAM working group on chemicals. ATLA30, Suppl. 1, 1–125.
18.
ForsbyA., PilliF., BianchiV., & WalumE. (1995). Determination of critical cellular neurotoxic concentrations in human neuroblastoma (SH-SY5Y) cell cultures. ATLA23, 800–811.
19.
DeJonghJ., ForsbyA., HoustonJ.B., BeckmanM., CombesR., & BlaauboerB.J. (1999). An integrated approach to the prediction of systemic toxicity using computer-based biokinetic models and biological in vitro test methods: overview of a prevalidation study based on the ECITTS project. Toxicology in Vitro13, 549–554.
20.
RubinL.L., & StaddonJ.M. (1999). The cell biology of the blood–brain barrier. Annual Review of Neuroscience22, 11–23.
21.
GarbergP. (1998). In vitro models of the blood–brain barrier. ATLA26, 821–847.
22.
de BoerA.G., & GaillardP.J. (2002). In vitro models of the blood–brain barrier: when to use which?Current Medicinal Chemistry — Central Nervous System Agents2, 203–209.
23.
MéresseS., DehouckM.P., DelormeP., BensaidM., TauberJ.P., DelbartC., FruchartJ.C., & CecchelliR. (1989). Bovine brain endothelial cells express tight junctions and monoamine oxidase activity in long-term culture. Journal of Neurochemistry53, 1363–1371.
24.
DehouckM.P., MéresseS., DelormeP., FruchartJ-C., & CecchelliR. (1990). An easier, reproducible, and mass-production method to study the blood–brain barrier in vitro.Journal of Neurochemistry54, 1798–1801.
25.
DehouckM.P., DehouckB., SchluepC., FruchartJ.C., LemaireM., & CecchelliR. (1995). Drug transport to the brain: comparison between in vitro and in vivo models of the blood–brain barrier. European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences3, 357–365.
26.
FenartL., Buée-ScherrerV., DescampsL., DuhemC., PoullainM.G., CecchelliR., & DehouckM.P. (1998). Inhibition of P-glycoprotein at the blood–brain barrier level: in vitro studies of its implication in blood–brain barrier integrity and in drug transport to the brain by an in vitro model of the blood–brain barrier. Pharmaceutical Research15, 993–1000.
27.
DehouckM.P., VigneP., TorpierG., BreittmayerJ.P., CecchelliR., & FrelinC. (1997). Endothelin-I as a mediator of endothelial cell–pericyte interactions in bovine brain capillaries. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism17, 464–469.
28.
DescampsL., DehouckM.P., TorpierG., & CecchelliR. (1996). Receptor-mediated transcytosis of transferrin through blood–brain barrier endothelial cells. American Journal of Physiology–Heart and Circulatory Physiology270, 1149–1158.
29.
FillebeenC., DescampsL., DehouckM.P., FenartL., BenaissaM., SpickG., CecchelliR., & PierceA. (1999). Receptor mediated transcytosis of lactoferrin through the blood–brain barrier. Journal of Biological Chemistry274, 7011–7017.
30.
CecchelliR., DehouckB., DescampsL., FenartL., Buée-ScherrerV., DuhemC., LundquistS., RentfelM., TorpierG., & DehouckM.P. (1999). In vitro model for evaluating drug transport across the blood–brain barrier. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews36, 165–178.
31.
LundquistS., RenftelM., BrillaultJ., FenartL., CecchelliR., & DehouckM.P. (2002). Prediction of drug transport through the blood–brain barrier in vivo: a comparison between two in vitro cell models. Pharmaceutical Research7, 976–981.
32.
HoheiselD., NitzT., FrankeH., WegenerJ., HakvoortA., TillingT., & GallaH-J. (1998). Hydrocortisone reinforces the blood–brain barrier properties in a serum-free cell culture system. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications244, 231–316.
33.
LohmannC., HüwelS., & GallaH-J. (2002). Predicting blood–brain barrier permeability of drugs: evaluation of different in vitro assays. Journal of Drug Targeting10, 263–276.
34.
EisenblätterT., HüwelS., & GallaH-J. (2003). Characterisation of the brain multidrug resistance protein (BMDP/ABCG2/BCRP) expressed at the blood–brain barrier. Brain Research971, 221–231.
35.
NitzT., EisenblätterT., PsathakiK., & GallaH-J. (2003). Serum-derived factors weaken the barrier properties of cultured porcine brain capillary endothelial cells in vitro.Brain Research981, 30–40.
36.
GaillardP.J., van der MeideP.H., de BoerA.G., & BreimerD.D. (2001). Glucocorticoid and type I interferon interactions at the blood–brain barrier: relevance for drug therapies for multiple sclerosis. NeuroReport12, 2189–2193.
37.
UyttendaeleH., ClossonV., WuG., RouxF., WeinmasterG., & KitajewskiJ. (2000). Notch4 and Jagged-1 induce microvessel differentiation of rat brain endothelial cells. Microvascular Research60, 91–103.
38.
DrexlerH.G., QuentmeierH., DirksW.G., & MacLeodR.A. (2002). Bladder carcinoma cell line ECV304 is not a model system for endothelial cells. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology — Animal38, 185–186.
39.
DirksW.G., MacLeodR.A., & DrexlerH.G. (1999). ECV304 (endothelial) is really T24 (bladder carcinoma): cell line cross-contamination at source. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology — Animal35, 558–559.
40.
LundquistS., RenftelM., BrillaultJ., FenartL., CecchelliR., & DehouckM.P. (2002). Prediction of drug transport through the blood–brain barrier in vivo: a comparison between two in vitro cell models. Pharmaceutical Research19, 976–981.
41.
GaillardP.J., VoorwindenL.H., NielsenJ.L., IvanovA., AtsumiR., EngmanH., RingbomC., de BoerA.G., & BreimerD.D. (2001). Establishment and functional characterizarion of an in vitro model of the blood–brain barrier, comprising a co-culture of brain capillary endothelial cells and astrocytes. European Journal of Pharmacuetical Sciences12, 215–222.
42.
KramerS.D., SchutzY.B., Wunderli-AllenspachH., AbbottN.J., & BegleyD.J. (2002). Lipids in blood–brain barrier models in vitro. II. Influence of glial cells on lipid classes and lipid fatty acids. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology — Animal38, 566–571.
43.
TillingT.H., EngelbertzC.H., DeckerS.T., KorteD., HüwelS., & GallaH-J. (2002). Expression and adhesive properties of basement membrane proteins in cerebral capillary endothelial cell cultures. Cell and Tissue Research310, 19–29.
44.
LohmannC., KrischkeM., WegenerJ., & GallaH-J. (2004). Tyrosine phosphatase inhibition induces loss of blood–brain barrier integrity by matrix metalloproteinase-dependent and independent pathways. Brain Research995, 184–196.
45.
TähtiH., NevalaH., & ToimelaT. (2003). Refining in vitro neurotoxicity testing — the development of blood–brain barrier models. ATLA31, 273–276.
46.
ToimelaT., MäenpääH., MannerströmM., & TähtiH. (2004). Development of an in vitro blood–brain barrier model — cytotoxicity of mercury and aluminum. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology195, 73–82.
47.
BlaauboerB.J. (2003). Biokinetic and toxicodynamic modelling and its role in toxicological research and risk assessment. ATLA31, 277–281.
48.
DeJonghJ., Nordin-AnderssonM., PloegerB., & ForsbyA. (1999). Estimation of systemic toxicity of acrylamide by integration of in vitro toxicity data with kinetic simulations. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology158, 261–268.
49.
PoulinP., & KrishnanK. (1996). A tissue composition-based algorithm for predicting tissue: air partition coefficients of organic chemicals. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology136, 126–130.
50.
DeJonghJ., VerhaarH.J., & HermensJ.L.M. (1997). A quantitative property–property relationship (QPPR) approach to estimate in vitro tissue-blood partition coefficients of organic chemicals in rats and humans. Archives of Toxicology72, 17–25.
51.
LeeG., DallasS., HongM., & BendayanR. (2001). Drug transporters in the central nervous system: brain barriers and brain parenchyma considerations. Pharmacological Reviews53, 569–596.
52.
SunH., DaiH., ShaikN., & ElmquistW.F. (2003). Drug efflux transporters in the CNS. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews55, 83–105.
53.
GaillardP.J., de BoerA.G., & BreimerD.D. (2003). Pharmacological investigations on lipopolysaccharide-induced permeability changes in the blood–brain barrier in vitro.Microvascular Research65, 24–31.
54.
Ghersi-EgeaJ.F., & StrazielleN. (2002). Choroid plexus transporters for drugs and other xenobiotics. Journal of Drug Targeting10, 353–357.
55.
RouxF., Durieu-TrautmannO., ChaverotN., ClaireM., MaillyP., BourreJ.M., StrosbergA.D., & CouraudP.O. (1994). Regulation of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase and alkaline phosphatase activities in immortalized rat brain microvessel endothelial cells. Journal of Cellular Physiology159, 101–113.
56.
GreenwoodJ., PryceG., DevineL., MaleD.K., dos SantosW.L., CalderV.L., & AdamsonP. (1996). SV40 large T immortalised cell lines of the rat blood–brain and blood–retinal barriers retain their phenotypic and immunological characteristics. Journal of Neuroimmunology71, 51–63.
57.
TerasakiT., & HosoyaK. (2001). Conditionally immortalized cell lines as a new in vitro model for the study of barrier functions. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin24, 111–118.
58.
BlasigI.E., GieseH., SchroeterM.L., SporbertA., UtepbergenovD.I., BuchwalowI.B., NeubertK., SchonfelderG., FreyerD., SchimkeI., SiemsW.E., PaulM., HaseloffR.F., & BlasigR. (2001). NO and oxyradical metabolism in new cell lines of rat brain capillary endothelial cells forming the blood–brain barrier. Microvascular Research62, 114–127.
59.
LechardeurD., SchwartzB., PaulinD., & SchermanD. (1995). Induction of blood–brain barrier differentiation in a rat brain-derived endothelial cell line. Experimental Cell Research220, 161–170.
60.
KidoY., TamaiI., OkamotoM., SuzukiF., & TsujiA. (2000). Functional clarification of MCT1-mediated transport of monocarboxylic acids at the blood–brain barrier using in vitro cultured cells and in vivo BUI studies. Pharmaceutical Research17, 55–62.
61.
MooradianD.L., & DiglioC.A. (1991). Production of a transforming growth factor-beta-like growth factor by RSV-transformed rat cerebral microvascular endothelial cells. Tumour Biology12, 171–183.
62.
XuJ., QuZ.X., MooreS.A., HsuC.Y., & HoganE.L. (1992). Receptor-linked hydrolysis of phosphoinositides and production of prostacyclin in cerebral endothelial cells. Journal of Neurochemistry58, 1930–1935.
63.
AsabaH., HosoyaK., TakanagaH., OhtsukiS., TamuraE., TakizawaT., & TerasakiT. (2000). Blood–brain barrier is involved in the efflux transport of a neuroactive steroid, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, via organic anion transporting polypeptide 2. Journal of Neurochemistry75, 1907–1916.
64.
WijsmanJ.A., & ShiversR.R. (1998). Immortalized mouse brain endothelial cells are ultrastructurally similar to endothelial cells and respond to astrocyteconditioned medium. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology — Animal34, 777–784.
65.
TatsutaT., NaitoM., Oh-haraT., SugawaraI., & TsuruoT. (1992). Functional involvement of P-glycoprotein in blood–brain barrier. Journal of Biological Chemistry267, 20383–20391.
66.
SobueK., YamamotoN., YonedaK., HodgsonM.E., YamashiroK., TsuruokaN., TsudaT., KatsuyaH., MiuraY., AsaiK., & KatoT. (1999). Induction of blood–brain barrier properties in immortalized bovine brain endothelial cells by astrocytic factors. Neuroscience Research35, 155–164.
67.
Durieu-TrautmannO., Foignant-ChaverotN., PerdomoJ., GounonP., StrosbergA.D., & CouraudP.O. (1991). Immortalization of brain capillary endothelial cells with maintenance of structural characteristics of the blood–brain barrier endothelium. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology — Animal27, 771–778.
68.
StinsM.F., PrasadaraoN.V., ZhouJ., ArditiM., & KimK.S. (1997). Bovine brain microvascular endothelial cells transfected with SV40-large T antigen: development of an immortalized cell line to study pathophysiology of CNS disease. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology — Animal33, 243–247.
69.
TeifelM., & FriedlP. (1996). Establishment of the permanent microvascular endothelial cell line PBMEC/C1-2 from porcine brains. Experimental Cell Research228, 50–57.
70.
MuruganandamA., HerxL.M., MonetteR., DurkinJ.P., & StanimirovicD.B. (1997). Development of immortalized cerebromicrovascular endothelial cell line as an in vitro model of the human blood–brain barrier. FASEB Journal11, 1187–1197.
71.
XiaoL., YangC., Dorovini-ZisK., TandonN.N., AdesE., LalA.A., & UdhayakumarV. (1996). Plasmodium falciparum: involvement of additional receptors in the cytoadherence of infected erythrocytes to microvascular endothelial cells. Experimental Parasitology84, 42–55.
72.
PrudhommeJ.G., ShermanI.W., LandK.M., MosesA.V., StengleinS., & NelsonJ.A. (1996). Studies of Plasmodium falciparum cytoadherence using immortalized human brain capillary endothelial cells. International Journal of Parasitology26, 647–655.
DrexlerH.G., QuentmeierH., DirksW.G., & MacLeodR.A. (2002). Bladder carcinoma cell line ECV304 is not a model system for endothelial cells. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology — Animal38, 185–186.
75.
VeronesiB. (1996). Characterization of the MDCK cell line for screening neurotoxicants. Neurotoxicology17, 433–443.
76.
SmithB.J., DoranA.C., McLeanS., TingleyF.D.III, O'NeillB.T., & KajijiS.M. (2001). P-glycoprotein efflux at the blood–brain barrier mediates differences in brain disposition and pharmacodynamics between two structurally related neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics298, 1252–1259.
77.
BatrakovaE.V., MillerD.W., LiS., AlakhovV.Y., KabanovA.V., & ElmquistW.F. (2001). Pluronic P85 enhances the delivery of digoxin to the brain: in vitro and in vivo studies. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics296, 551–557.