The Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM): A Review of the ICCVAM Test Method Evaluation Process and Current International Collaborations with the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM)
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 2002
The Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM): A Review of the ICCVAM Test Method Evaluation Process and Current International Collaborations with the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM)
Over the last decade, national authorities in the USA and Europe have launched initiatives to validate new and improved toxicological test methods. In the USA, the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM), and its supporting National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM), were established by the Federal Government to work with test developers and Federal agencies to facilitate the validation, review, and adoption of new scientifically sound test methods, including alternatives that can reduce, refine, and replace animal use. In Europe, the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) was established to conduct validation studies on alternative test methods. Despite differences in organisational structure and processes, both organisations seek to achieve the adoption and use of alternative test methods. Accordingly, both have adopted similar validation and regulatory acceptance criteria. Collaborations and processes have also evolved to facilitate the international adoption of new test methods recommended by ECVAM and ICCVAM. These collaborations involve the sharing of expertise and data for test-method workshops and independent scientific peer reviews, and the adoption of processes to expedite the consideration of test methods already reviewed by the other organisation. More recently, NICEATM and ECVAM initiated a joint international validation study on in vitro methods for assessing acute systemic toxicity. These collaborations are expected to contribute to accelerated international adoption of harmonised new test methods that will support improved public health and provide for reduced and more-humane use of laboratory animals.
WorthA.P., & BallsM. (2001). The role of ECVAM in promoting the regulatory acceptance of alternative methods in the European Union. ATLA29, 525–535.
2.
PurchaseI.F.H., BothamP.A., BrunerL.H., FlintO.P., FrazierJ.M., & StokesW.S. (1998). Scientific and regulatory challenges for the reduction, refinement, and replacement of animals in toxicity testing. Toxicological Sciences43, 86–101.
3.
HillR., & StokesW.S. (1999). Validation and regulatory acceptance of alternatives. Cambridge Quarterly Healthcare Ethics8, 74–80.
4.
StokesW.S. (1997). Animal use alternatives in research and testing: obligation and opportunity. Laboratory Animals26, 28–32.
5.
StokesW.S., & MarafanteE. (1998). Alternative testing methodologies: the 13th meeting of the scientific group on methodologies for the safety evaluation of chemicals: introduction and summary. Environmental Health Perspectives106, 405–412.
6.
StokesW.S., & HillR. (2000). The Role of the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods in the evaluation of new toxicological testing methods. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement, and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. BallsM., van ZellerA-M., & HalderM.E.), pp. 385–394. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
United States Code (1993). National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act of 1993. Public Law 103–43. Washington, DC, USA: US Government Printing Office.
9.
NIEHS (1997). Validation and Regulatory Acceptance of Toxicological Test Methods: a Report of the Ad Hoc Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods. NIH Publication No. 97–3981. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: NIEHS. Web site http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/docs/guidelines/validate.pdf (Accessed 12.10.02).
10.
Anon. (2000). ICCVAM Authorization Act of 2000. Public Law No. 106-545, 114 Stat. 2721 (to be codified at 42 USC. Sec. 285l-2).
11.
NIEHS (1997). Notice of meeting to discuss the procedures and activities of the National Toxicology Program (NTP) Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM) and the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM). 62 FR 55649. October 27, 1997. Web site http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/docs/FR/6255649.pdf (Accessed 12.10.02).
12.
ICCVAM (2001). Annual progress report of the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: NIEHS. Web site http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov (Accessed 12.10.02).
13.
United States Code (1972). Federal Advisory Committee Act. Public Law 92-463. Washington, DC, USA: Government Printing Office.
14.
NIEHS (2002). Notice of Establishment: Scientific Advisory Committee on Alternative Toxicological Methods. 67 FR 11358. March 13, 2002. Web site http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/docs/FR/6711358.htm (Accessed 12.10.02).
15.
ICCVAM (1999). Evaluation of the validation status of toxicological methods: general guidelines for submissions to ICCVAM. NIH Publication No. 99-4496. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: NIEHS. Web site http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/doc1.htm (Accessed 12.10.02).
16.
StokesW.S., & JensenD.J. (1995). Guidelines for institutional animal care and use committees: consideration of alternatives. Contemporary Topics in Laboratory Animal Science34, 51–60.
17.
United States Code (1985). Animal Welfare Act Amendment. Public Law 99-198. Washington, DC, USA: Government Printing Office.
18.
US Department of Agriculture (1989). Animal Welfare. Final Rules: Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 1, 2, and 3. 54 FR 36112.Washington, DC, USA: Government Printing Office.
19.
United States Code (1985). Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Public Law 99-158. Washington, DC, USA: Government Printing Office.
20.
Public Health Service (1986). Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.Washington, DC, USA: Department of Health and Human Services.
21.
ICCVAM (1999). The Murine Local Lymph Node Assay: a Test Method for Assessing the Allergic Contact Dermatitis Potential of Chemical/ Compounds. NIH Publication No. 99-4494. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: NIEHS. Web site http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/methods/llnadocs/llnarep.htm (Accessed 12.10.02).
22.
SailstadD., HattanD., HillR., & StokesW. (2001). Evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA). I. The ICCVAM review process. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology34, 258–273.
23.
DeanJ., TwerdokL., TiceR., SailstadD., HattanD., & StokesW. (2001). Evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA). II. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology34, 274–286.
24.
HanekeK., TiceR., CarsonB., MargolinB., & StokesW. (2001). Evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA). III. Data analyses completed by the National Toxicology Program (NTP) Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology34, 287–291.
25.
OECD (2002). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, No. 429: Sensitization: Local Lymph Node Assay.Paris, France: OECD.
26.
OECD (2001). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, No. 425: Acute Oral Toxicity — Up-and-Down Procedures.Paris, France: OECD.
27.
OECD (2001). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, No. 423: Acute Oral Toxicity — Acute Toxic Class Method.Paris, France: OECD.
28.
OECD (2001). OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, No. 420: Acute Oral Toxicity — Fixed Dose Method.Paris, France: OECD.
29.
ICCVAM (1999). Report of the International Workshop on In Vitro Methods for Assessing Acute Systemic Toxicity. Results of an International Workshop Organized by the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) and the National Toxicology Program (NTP) Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM). NIH Publication No. 01-4499. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: NIEHS. Web site http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/methods/invidocs/finalrpt/finalcov.htm (Accessed 12.10.02)
30.
ICCVAM (2001). Guidance Document on Using In Vitro Data to Estimate In Vivo Starting Doses for Acute Toxicity. Based on Recommendations from an International Workshop Organized by the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods and the National Toxicology Program (NTP) Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM). NIH Publication No. 01-4500. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: NIEHS. Web site http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/methods/invidocs/guidance/iv_guide.pdf (Web site 12.10.02).
31.
BradlawJ.A., & WilcoxN.L. (1997). Executive summary: workshop on eye irritation testing: practical applications of non-whole animal alternatives. Food and Chemical Toxicology35, 1–11.
32.
van ZutphenL.F.M., & GoldbergA.M. eds (1995). Alternative Methods in Toxicology, Vol. 11, The World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences: Education, Research, Testing.738 pp. New York, NY, USA: Mary Ann Liebert.
33.
ICCVAM (1999). CORROSITEX®: An In Vitro Test Method for Assessing Dermal Corrosivity Potential of Chemicals. NIH Publication No. 99-4495. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: NIEHS. Web site http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/docs/reports/corprrep.htm (Accessed 12.10.02).
34.
ICCVAM (2001). The Revised Up-and-Down Procedure: a Test Method for Determining the Acute Oral Toxicity of Chemicals. NIH Publication No. 02-4501. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: NIEHS. Web site http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/methods/udpdocs/udpfin/vol_1.pdf (Accessed 12.10.02).
35.
BallsM., GoldbergA.M., FentemJ.H., BroadheadC.L., BurchR.L., FestingM.F.W., FrazierJ.M., HendriksenC.F.M., JenningsM., van der KampM.D.O., MortonD.B., RowanA.M., RussellC., RussellW.M.S., SpielmannH., StephensM.L., StokesW.S., StraughanD.W., YagerJ.D., Zurlo, & van ZutphenB.F.M. (1995). The Three Rs: the way forward. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 11. ATLA23, 838–866.
36.
NIEHS (2001). EPISKIN™, EpiDerm™, and Rat Skin Transcutaneous Electrical Resistance Methods: In Vitro Test Methods Proposed for Assessing the Dermal Corrosivity Potential of Chemicals: Notice of Availability of a Background Review Document and Proposed ICCVAM Test Method Recommendations and Request for Public Comment. 66 FR 49685, September 28, 2001. Web site http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/docs/FR/6649685.pdf (Accessed 12.10.02).
37.
ICCVAM (2002). ICCVAM evaluation of EPISKIN™, EpiDerm™ (EPI-200), and the Rat Skin Transcutaneous Electrical Resistance (TER) Assay: In Vitro Test Methods for Assessing Dermal Corrosivity Potential of Chemicals. NIH Publication No. 02-4502. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: NIEHS. Web site http://iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/methods/epiddocs/cwgfinal/cwgfinal.pdf (Accessed 12.10.02).
38.
EC (2000). EU Commission Directive 2000/33/EC of 25 April 2000 on the skin corrosion, rat skin TER and human skin model assays. Official Journal of the European Communities136, 90–95.
39.
ECVAM (2000). Statement on the validity of the local lymph node assay for skin sensitisation testing. ATLA28, 366–367.
40.
ECVAM (2001). Statement on the application of the CORROSITEX® assay for skin corrosivity testing. ATLA29, 96–97.
41.
EkwallB., BarileF.A., CastanoA., ClemedsonC., ClothierR.H., DierickxP., EkwallBa., FerroM., FiskesjoG., Garza-OcanasL., Gomez-LechonM.J., GuldenM., HallT., IsomaaB., KahruA., KerszmanG., KristenU., KunimotoM., KarenlampiS., LewanL., LoukianovA., OhnoT., PersooneG., RomertL., SawyerT.W., SegnerH., ShrivastavaR., StammatiA., TanakaN., ValentinoM., WalumE., & ZuccoF. (1998). MEIC evaluation of acute systemic toxicity. Part VI. Prediction of human toxicity by rodent LD50 values and results from 61 in vitro tests. ATLA26, Suppl. 2, 617–658.
42.
HalleW. (1998). Toxixitatsprufungen in Zellkulturen fur eine Vorhersage der akuten Toxizitat (LD50) zur Einsparung von Tierversuchen. Life Sciences/Lebenswissenschaften, Volume 1, 94 pp. Jülich, Germany: Forschungszentrum Jülich.
43.
SpielmannH., GenschowE., LiebschM., & HalleW. (1999). Determination of the starting dose for acute oral toxicity (LD50) testing in the up-and-down procedure (UDP) from cytotoxicity data. ATLA27, 957–966.
44.
OECD (2001). Harmonized Integrated Classification System for Human Health and Environmental Hazards of Chemical Substances and Mixtures.247 pp. Paris, France: OECD.
45.
StricklandJ.A., ParisM.W., TiceR.R., & StokesW.S. (2002). Selection of reference chemicals to validate in vitro cytotoxicity assays for estimating in vivo starting doses for acute oral toxicity. Toxicological Sciences66, 249.
