House of Lords (2002). Select Committee on Animals in Scientific Procedures, Volume I: Report. HL Paper 150-I, 82 pp. London, UK: The Stationery Office.
BoguskyM.S. (2002). The mouse that roared. Nature, London420, 515–518.
4.
Editorial (2002). Only as a last resort. New Scientist2370, 21 November 2002, 50.
5.
O'ConnorA.M. (1997). Barriers to regulatory acceptance. In Animal Alternatives, Welfare and Ethics (ed. van ZutphenL.F.M., & BallsM.), pp. 1173–1176. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
6.
FRAME (1999). Focus on FRAME: Transgenic Animals, 4 pp. Nottingham, UK: FRAME.
7.
FRAME (1997). Focus on FRAME: Food Additives Testing and Alternatives, 4 pp. Nottingham, UK: FRAME.
8.
RussellW.M.S., & BurchR.L. (1959). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique, 238 pp. London, UK: Methuen.
9.
Anon. (2002). Bad use of statistics adds up to “woeful” research standards. Biomedical News, November 2002, 1 (Croydon, UK: Laboratory News).
10.
BallsM., GoldbergA.M., FentemJ.H., BroadheadC.L., BurchR.L., FestingM.F.W., FrazierJ.M., HendriksenC.F.M., JenningsM., van der KampM.D.O., MortonD.B., RowanA.N., RussellC., RussellW.M.S., SpielmannH., StephensM.L., StokesW.S., StraughanD.W., YagerJ.D., ZurloJ., & van ZutphenB.F.M. (1995). The Three Rs: the way forward. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 11. ATLA23, 838–866.
11.
Anon. (1994). Animal Procedures Committee Report to the Home Secretary on Regulatory Toxicity, 20 pp. London, UK: Home Office Publications.
12.
Anon. (2001). Guidance on the Conduct of Regulatory Toxicology Safety Evaluation Studies, 14 pp. London, UK: Home Office Publications.
13.
CombesR.D., & BallsM. (2001). Ethical investment — what is it, and what are the implications for industry funding of research into alternatives?ATLA29, 55–62.
14.
Anon. (1994). Animal Procedures Committee Report to the Home Secretary on Openness, 44 pp. London, UK: Home Office Publications.
15.
van der ValkJ., DewhurstD., HughesI., AtkinsonJ., BalcombeJ., BraunH., GabrielsonK., GruberF., MilesJ., NabJ., NardiJ., van WilgenburgH., ZinkoU., & ZurloJ. (1999). Alternatives to the use of animals in higher education. Report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 33. ATLA27, 39–52.
Anon. (2001). Animals (Scientific Procedures) Inspectorate: Review of the “Ethical Review Process” in Establishments Designated Under the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, 32 pp. London, UK: Home Office Publications.
18.
CombesR.D. (1999). New measures on animal experimentation in the UK will improve animal welfare and scientific research. ATLA27, 309–316.
19.
ABPI (2002). Report by the House of Lords’ Animals in Scientific Procedures Committee, 13 pp. London, UK: The Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry.
20.
LangleyC.K. (2002). A National Centre for the Replacement of Animals in Experiments, 18 pp. London, UK: Lord Dowding Fund and Dr Hadwen Trust.
21.
MortonD.B. (1999). Humane endpoints in animal experimentation for biomedical research: ethical, legal and practical aspects. In Humane Endpoints in Animal Experiments for Biomedical Research (ed. HendriksenC.F.M., & MortonD.B.), pp. 5–12. London, UK: Royal Society of Medicine Press.
22.
House of Lords (2002). Select Committee on Animals in Scientific Procedures, Volume II: Oral Evidence. HL Paper 150-II, 411 pp. London, UK: The Stationery Office.