Cooper-HannanR., HarbellJ.W., CoeckeS., BallsM., BoweG., CervinkaM., ClothierR., HermannF., KlahmL.K., de LangeJ., LiebschM., & VanparysP. (1999). The principles of Good Laboratory Practice: application to in vitro toxicology studies. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop report 37. ATLA27, 539–577.
2.
GstraunthalerG., & HartungT. (1999). Bologna Declaration toward Good Cell Culture Practice. Third World Congress on Alternatives and Animal Use in the Life Sciences, Bologna, Italy. ATLA27, 206.
3.
HartungT., GstraunthalerG., & BallsM. (2000). Bologna Statement on Good Cell Culture Practice (GCCP). ALTEX17, 38–39.
4.
AndersonR., O'HareM., BallsM., BradyM., BrahamsD., BurtA., ChesneC., CombesR., DennisonA., GarthoffB., HawksworthG., KalterE., LechatA., MayerD., RogiersV., SladowskiD., SoutheeJ., TraffordJ., van der ValkJ., & van ZellerA.M. (1998). The availability of human tissue for biomedical research. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop report 32. ATLA26, 763–777.
5.
AndersonR., BallsM., BurkeM.D., CumminsM., FehilyD., GrayN., de GrootM.G., HelinH., HuntC., JonesD., PriceD., RichertL., RavidR., ShuteD., SladowskiD., StoneH., ThaslerW., TraffordJ., van der ValkJ., WeissT., WomackC., & YlikomiT. (2001). The establishment of human research tissue banking in the UK and several western European countries. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop report 44. ATLA29, 125–134.
6.
ArlettC.F. (2001). Increased use of human cell lines: yet more skeletons in the cupboard?ATLA29, 513–515.
7.
ArlettC.F. (2001). The use of dubious cell lines in research: is trust enough?Lancet Oncology2, 467.
8.
BardouilleC. (2001). Maintenance of Cell Cultures —with special emphasis on eukaryotic cells. In Biotechnology (ed. RehmH-J., & ReedG.), pp. 28–40. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
9.
CartwrightT., & ShahG.P. (1994). Culture media. In Basic Cell Culture: A Practical Approach (ed. DavisJ.M.), pp. 57–91. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.
DarlingD.C., & MorganS.J. (1994). Animal Cells: Culture and Media, Essential Data, 151 pp. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
11.
DoyleA., & GriffithsJ.B. (1997). Mammalian Cell Culture: Essential Techniques, 174 pp. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
12.
DoyleA., GriffithsJ.B., & NewellD.G. (1998). Cell and Tissue Culture: Laboratory Procedures, Vol. 3.New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
FreshneyR.I. (2000). Culture of Animal Cells: A Manual of Basic Techniques, 4th edn, 486 pp. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley & Sons.
15.
FroudS.J., & LukerJ. (1994). Good laboratory practice in the cell culture laboratory. In Basic Cell Culture: A Practical Approach (ed. DavisJ.M.), pp. 273–286. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
GstraunthalerG. (2000). Standardisierung in der Zellkultur: wo fangen wir an? In Forschung ohne Tierversuche 2000 (ed. SchöfflH., SpielmannH., GruberF.P., ApplH., HarrerF., PfallerW., & TritthartH.A.), pp. 40–49. Vienna, Austria: Springer.
17.
GstraunthalerG., SeppiT., & PfallerW. (1999). Impact of culture conditions, culture media volumes, and glucose content on metabolic properties of renal epithelial cell cultures. Are renal cells in tissue culture hypoxic?Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry9, 150–172.
18.
HartungT., & GstraunthalerG. (2000). The standardisation of cell culture procedures. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. BallsM., van ZellerA-M., & HalderM.E.), pp. 1655–1658. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
19.
HartungT., GstraunthalerG., CoeckeS., LewisD., BlanckO., & BallsM. (2001). Good Cell Culture Practice (GCCP): eine Initiative zur Standardisierung und Qualitätssicherung von in vitro Arbeiten. Die Etablierung einer ECVAM Task Force on GCCP. ALTEX18, 75–78.
20.
HayR.J. (1998). The seed stock concept and quality control for cell lines. Analytical Biochemistry171, 225–237.
21.
HayR.J., ReidY.A., McClintockP.R., ChenT.R., & MacyM.L. (1996). Cell line banks and their role in cancer research. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry24, Suppl., 107–130.
22.
HayR.J. (1988). The seed stock concept and quality control for cell lines. Analytical Biochemistry171, 225–237.
23.
HayR.J. (2000). Cell line authentication and the seed stock concept. In Forschung ohne Tierversuche 2000 (ed. SchöfflH., SpielmannH., GruberF.P., ApplH., HarrerF., PfallerW., & TritthartH.A.), pp. 275–281. Vienna, Austria: Springer.
24.
HayflickL. (1990). In the interest of clearer communication. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology26, 1–6.
McAteerJ.A., & DavisJ. (1994). Basic cell culture technique and the maintenance of cell lines. In Basic Cell Culture: A Practical Approach (ed. DavisJ.M.), pp. 93–148, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
27.
MarkovicO., & MarkovicN. (1998). Cell cross-contamination in cell cultures: the silent and neglected danger. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology34, 1–8.
28.
MastersJ.R.W., TwentymanP., ArlettC., DaleyR., DavisJ., DoyleA., DyerS, FreshneyI., GalpineA., HarrisonM., HurstH., KellandL., StaceyG., StratfordI., & WardT.H. (1999). UKCCCR Guidelines for the Use of Cell Lines in Cancer Research, 52 pp. London, UK: United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research.
29.
Anon. (1988). Chancen und Risiken durch Säugerzellkulturen. Forum Mikrobiologie11, 359–367.
30.
Anon. (1991). Gefährdungspotential durch Retroviren beim Umgang mit tierischen Zellkulturen. BIOforum11, 428–436.
31.
Nelson-ReesW.A., DanielsD.W., & FlandermeyerR.R. (1981). Cross-contamination of cells in culture. Science212, 446–452.
32.
PetriccianiJ.C. (1998). An overview of viral and viral-like agents in cell culture systems. Cytotechnology28, 49–52.
33.
SchaefferW.I. (1984). Usage of vertebrate, invertebrate and plant cell, tissue and organ culture terminology. In Vitro20, 19–24.
34.
SchaefferW.I. (1989). In the interest of clear communication. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology25, 389–390.
35.
SchaefferW.I. (1990). Terminology associated with cell, tissue and organ culture, molecular biology and molecular genetics. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology26, 97–101.
36.
SpierR.E. (1998). Animal and plant cell technology: a critical evaluation of the technology/society interface. Journal of Biotechnology65, 111–125.
37.
StaceyG., DoyleA., & HambletonP. eds (1998). Safety in Cell and Tissue Culture (ed. StaceyG., DoyleA., & HambletonP.), 248 pp. Dordrecht, Germany: Kluwer.
38.
TaubM. (1990). The use of defined media in cell and tissue culture. Toxicology in Vitro4, 213–225.
39.
WiebelF.J., AnderssonT.B., CascianoD.A., DickinsM., FischerV., GlattH., HorbachJ., LangenbachR.J., LuytenW., TurchiG., & VandewalleA. (1997). Genetically engineered cell lines: characterisation and applications in toxicity testing. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 26. ATLA25, 625–639.