Animal Procedures Committee (1998). The review of the operation of the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986: the final report. In Report of the Animal Procedures Committee for 1997, pp. 28–35. London, UK: The Stationery Office.
2.
Animal Procedures Committee (2001). Animal Procedures Committee report on biotechnology. Website http//www.apc.gov.uk (23 July 2001).
3.
JenkinsE.S., & CombesR.D. (2000). FRAME's response to an APC questionnaire on emerging biotechnologies and The Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986.ATLA28, 333–338.
4.
MephamT.B., CombesR.D., BallsM., BarbieriO., BlokhuisH.J., CostaP., CrillyR.E., de Cock BuningT., DelpireV.C., O'HareM.J., HoudebineL-M., van KreijlC.F., van der MeerM., ReinhardtC.A., WolfE., & van ZellerA-M. (1998). The use of transgenic animals in the European Union. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 28. ATLA26, 21–43.
5.
HMSO (2001). Statistics of Scientific Procedures on Living Animals: Great Britain 2000, Cm 5244, 112 pp. London, UK: HMSO.
6.
BottrillK. (2001). ANDi: “Now, God help thee, poor monkey!”ATLA29, 1–2.
7.
JenkinsE.S., & FrancisR.F. (1999). New guidance notes for projects generating or maintaining genetically modified animals. ATLA27, 883–902.
8.
HMSO (2000). Statistics of Scientific Procedures on Living Animals: Great Britain 1999, Cm 4841, 109 pp. London, UK: HMSO.
9.
Royal Society (2001). The Use of Genetically Modified Animals.48 pp. London, UK: Royal Society.
10.
DelpireV.C., MephamT.B., & BallsM. (1999). A proposal for a new ethical scheme addressing the use of laboratory animals in biomedical purposes. ATLA27, 869–881.
