BenfordD.J., & TennantD.R. (1997). Food chemical risk assessment. In Food Chemical Risk Analysis (ed. TennantD.R.), pp. 21–56. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
2.
BroadheadC.L., CombesR.D., & BallsM. (1997). Risk assessment: alternatives to animal testing. In Food Chemical Risk Analysis (ed. TennantD.R.), pp. 133–162. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
3.
Home Office (2000). Statistics of Scientific Procedures on Living Animals, Great Britain 1999.109 pp. Cm. 4841. London, UK: The Stationery Office.
4.
Commission of the European Communities (1994). First Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the Statistics on the Number of Animals Used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes, COM (1994), 195 final, 27 May.Brussels, Belgium: CEC.
5.
StraughanD.W. (1994). First European Commission report on statistics of animal use. ATLA22, 289–292.
6.
Commission of the European Communities (1999). Second Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the Statistics on the Number of Animals Used for Experimental and other Scientific Purposes, COM (1999), 191 final, 26 April.Brussels, Belgium: CEC.
7.
Commission of the European Communities (1980). Guidelines for the Safety Assessment of Food Additives. Reports of the Scientific Committee for Food (Tenth series) (EUR 6892), pp. 5–21. Luxembourg: CEC.
8.
Commission of the European Communities (2000). White Paper on Food Safety, COM (1999), 719 final, 12 January.Brussels, Belgium: CEC.
9.
BarrattM. D. (2000). Principles of toxicity prediction from chemical structure. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. BallsM., van ZellerA-M., & HalderM.E.), pp. 449–456. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
10.
JudsonP. (1997). Expert systems for hazard evaluation. In Food Chemical Risk Analysis (ed. TennantD.R.), pp. 109–132. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
11.
LongA., & CombesR.D. (1995). Using DEREK to predict the activity of some carcinogens/mutagens found in foods. Toxicology in Vitro9, 563–569.
12.
EkwallB. (1999). Overview of the final MEIC results. II. The in vitro – in vivo evaluation, including the selection of a practical battery of cell tests for prediction of acute lethal blood concentrations in humans. Toxicology in Vitro13, 665–673.
13.
Anon. (2000). National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Toxicology Program (NTP); notice of an international workshop on in vitro methods for assessing acute systemic toxicity, co-sponsored by NIEHS, NTP and the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): request for data and suggested expert scientists. Federal Register65, 37,400–37,403.
14.
DeJonghJ., ForsbyA., HoustonJ.B., BeckmanM., CombesR., & BlaauboerB.J. (1999). An integrated approach to the prediction of systemic toxicity using computer-based biokinetic models and biological in vitro test methods: overview of a prevalidation study based on the ECITTS project. Toxicology in Vitro13, 549–554.
15.
van VlietP. W., & DeJonghJ. (1996). Biokinetics and biokinetic models in risk assessment. Human and Experimental Toxicology15, 799–809.
16.
BlaauboerB.J., BarrattM.D., & HoustonJ.B. (1999). The integrated use of alternative methods in toxicological risk evaluation. ATLA27, 229–237.
17.
Department of Health (1989). Report on Health and Social Subjects, 35. Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals for Mutagenicity. Committee on Mutagenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment.London, UK: HMSO.
18.
Department of Health (2000). Guidance on a Strategy for Testing of Chemicals for Mutagenicity. Committee on Mutagenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and the Environment, 44 pp. London, UK: HMSO.
19.
CombesR.D. (2000). Endocrine disruptors: a critical review of in vitro and in vivo testing strategies for assessing their toxic hazard to humans. ATLA28, 81–118.
20.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1998). OECD Guideline 409 for the Testing of Chemicals. Repeated Dose 90-day Oral Toxicity Study in Non-Rodents, 9 pp. Paris, France: OECD.
21.
WilsonN.H., & HayesJ.R. (1994). Short-term repeated dosing and subchronic toxicity studies. In Principles and Methods of Toxicology, 3rd Edn (ed. HayesA.W.), pp. 649–672. New York, USA: Raven Press.
22.
LumleyC.E., & WalkerS.R. (1985). The value of chronic animal toxicology studies of pharmaceutical compounds: a retrospective analysis. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology5, 1007–1024.
23.
LumleyC.E., & WalkerS.R. (1986). A critical appraisal of the duration of chronic animal toxicity studies. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology6, 66–72.
24.
IgarashiT. (1993). A review of the Japanese Pharmaceutical Manufacturers’ Association database currently established to examine retrospectively the value of long-term animal toxicity studies. Adverse Drug Reaction Toxicology Reviews12, 35–52.
25.
ContreraJ.F., AubD., BarbehennE., BelairE., ChenC., EvoniukG., MainigiK., MielachF., & SancilioL. (1993). A retrospective comparison of the results of 6 and 12 month non-rodent toxicity studies. Adverse Drug Reactions and Toxicology Reviews12, 63–76.
26.
BroadheadC.L., JenningsM., & CombesR.D. (1999). A Critical Evaluation of the Use of Dogs in the Regulatory Toxicity Testing of Pharmaceuticals, 106 pp. Nottingham, UK: FRAME.
27.
Anon. (1998). International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Duration of Chronic Toxicity Testing in Animals (Rodent and Non Rodent Toxicity Testing), 2 pp. Geneva, Switzerland: ICH.
28.
GerbrachtU., & SpielmannH. (1998). The use of dogs as a second species in regulatory testing of pesticides. I. Interspecies comparison. Archives of Toxicology72, 319–329.
29.
GerbrachtU., & SpielmannH. (2001). The use of dogs as second species in regulatory testing of pesticides. II. Subacute, subchronic and chronic studies in the dog. Archives of Toxicology, in press.
30.
van ZellerA-M., & CombesR.D. (1999). Transgenic mouse bioassays for carcinogenicity testing: a step in the right direction?ATLA27, 839–846.
31.
VericatJ-A., & HanleyA.B. (2000). Chronic toxicity testing in vitro. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (ed. BallsM., van ZellerA-M., & HalderM.), pp. 1631–1638. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
32.
ClemedsonC., BarileF.A., ChesnéC., CottinM., CurrenR., EkwallB., FerroM., Gómez-LechónM.J., ImaiK., JanusJ., KempR.B., KerszmanG., KjellstrandP., LavrijsenK., Loge-mannP., McFarlane-AbdullaE., RoguetR., SegnerH., ThuvanderA., WalumE., & EkwallB. (2000). MEIC evaluation of acute systemic toxicity. Part VII. Prediction of human toxicity by results from testing of the first 30 reference chemicals with 27 further in vitro assays. ATLA28, 161–200.
33.
PfallerW., BallsM., ClothierR., CoeckeS., DierickxP., EkwallB., HanleyB.A., HartungT., PrietoP., RyanM.P., SchmuckG., ŠladowskiD., VericatJ-A., WendelA., WolfA., & ZimmerJ. (2001). Novel advanced in vitro methods for long-term toxicity testing. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 45. ATLA29, 393–426.
34.
HanleyA.B., McBrideJ., OehlschlagerS., & OparaE. (1999). Use of a flow cell bioreactor as a chronic toxicity model system. Toxicology in Vitro13, 847–851.
35.
McBrideM., PrietoP., SladowskiD., OehlschlagerS., & HanleyB. (1999). The prevalidation of a flow cell bioreactor for chronic toxicity testing. ATLA27, Special Issue, 416 (poster abstract).
36.
CartwrightT. (1994). Animal Cells as Bioreactors, 184 pp. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
37.
BrunerL.H., de SilvaO., EarlL.K., EastyD.L., PapeW., & SpielmannH. (1998). Report on the COLIPA workshop on mechanisms of eye irritation. ATLA26, 811–820.
38.
BallsM., BergN., BrunerL.H., CurrenR.D., de SilvaO., EarlL.K., EsdaileD.J., FentemJ.H., LiebschM., OhnoY., PrinsenM.K., SpielmannH., & WorthA. (1999). Eye irritation testing: the way forward. The report and recommendations of ECVAM Workshop 34. ATLA27, 53–77.
39.
CombesR.D. (1999). Summary of discussion: in vitro models for investigation of chronic toxicity and reversibility. Toxicology in Vitro13, 853–857.
40.
ClothierR.H., & SansomR. (1996). Effects of surfactant retreatment in vitro: a method to evaluate changes in cell junctions and in cell viability. ATLA24, 859–865.
41.
ClothierR.H., BeedM., SamsonR., & WardR. (1997). An in vitro approach to the evaluation of repeat exposure in the prediction of toxicity. Toxicology in Vitro11, 679–682.
42.
ClothierR., StarzecG., StiphoS., & KwongY.C. (1999). Assessment of initial damage and recovery following exposure of MDCK cells to an irritant. Toxicology in Vitro13, 713–717.
43.
CombesR., BallsM., CurrenR., FischbachM., FusenigN., KirklandD., LasneC., LandolphJ., LeBoeufR., MarquardtH., McCormickJ., MüllerL, RivedalE., SabbioniE., TanakaN., VasseurP., & YamasakiH. (1999). Cell transformation assays as predictors of human carcinogenicity. ATLA27, 745–767.
44.
Scientific Committee for Food (1996). Opinion on Response to Request from the Commission for SCF Opinion on the Scientific Basis of the Concept of Threshold of Regulation in Relation to Food Contact Materials. Annex VII to Document III/5557/96.Brussels, Belgium: CEC, SCF.
45.
CombesR.D. (1997). Defining a “threshold of regulation”: the ultimate alternative for safety assessment?ATLA25, 187–191.
46.
KroesR., GalliC., MunroI., SchilterB., TranL-A., WalkerR., & WürtzenG. (2000). Threshold of toxicological concern for chemical substances present in the diet: a practical tool for assessing the need for toxicity testing. Food and Chemical Toxicology38, 255–312.
47.
CheesemanM.A., MachugaE.J., & BaileyA.B. (1999). A tiered approach to threshold of regulation. Food and Chemical Toxicology37, 387–412.
48.
van PoppelG., VerhagenH., & HeinzowB. (1997). Biomarkers in epidemiological and toxicological nutrition research. In Food Chemical Risk Analysis (ed. TennantD.R.), pp. 87–108. London, UK: Chapman & Hall.
49.
BenfordD.J., HanleyA.B., BottrillK., OehlschlagerS., BallsM., BrancaF., CastegnaroJ.J., DescotesJ., HemminikiK., LindsayD., & SchilterB. (2000). Biomarkers as predictive tools in toxicity testing. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 40. ATLA28, 119–131.
50.
BottrillK. (1998). The use of biomarkers as alternatives to current animal tests on food chemicals. ATLA26, 421–480.
51.
CraigA., HolmesE., NicholsonJ.K., & OrtonT. (2000). NMR-based metabonomic “studies” on the hepatotoxicity of methapyrilene and the detection of novel biomarkers of effect. Toxicology Letters116, Suppl. 1, 102–103 (abstract).
52.
NicholsonJ.K., LindonJ.C., & HolmesE. (1999). “Metabonomics”: understanding the metabolic responses of living systems to pathophysiological stimuli via multivariate statistical analysis of biological NMR spectroscopic data. Xenobiotica29, 1181–1189.
53.
RobertsonD.G., ReilyM.D., SiglerR.E., WellsD.F., PatersonD.A., & BradenT.K. (2000). Metabonomics: evaluation of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and pattern recognition technology for rapid in vivo screening of liver and kidney toxicants. Toxicological Sciences57, 326–337.
54.
StanleyE.G., NichollsA.W., WaterfieldC.J., HaseldenJ.N., & NicholsonJ.K. (2000). NMR spectroscopic studies of acetazolamide-induced metabolic acidosis in the rat. Toxicology Letters116, Suppl. 1, 116–117 (abstract).
AtterwillC.K., GoldfarbP., & PurcellW. eds (2000). Approaches to High Throughput Toxicity Screening, 200 pp. London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
57.
PennieW.D., TugwoodJ.D., OliverG.J., & KimberI. (2000). The principles and practice of toxicogenomics: applications and opportunities. Toxicological Sciences54, 277–283.
58.
KimberI., & PennieW.D. (2000). Toxicogenomics: application of genomics to toxicological sciences. In Progress in the Reduction, Refinement and Replacement of Animal Experimentation (eds. BallsM., van ZellerA-M., & HalderM.), pp. 177–183. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
59.
FieldenM.R., & ZacharewskiT.R. (2001). Challenges and limitations of gene expression profiling in mechanistic and predictive toxicology. Toxicological Sciences60, 6–10.