Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article examines the relationship of new right ideology to the attack on welfare. It asks why it is so hard to defend the welfare state in its present form. Central to new right ideology is a methodological individualism rooted in biological determinism, sociobiology, which replaces a collective by an individual view of human need. Neo-marxist writings on the welfare state emphasise the state, but neglect the second (private) and third, (domestic) systems of welfare pointed to by the new feminist critique. This critique, which derives from an analysis of gender divisions and the nature of reproductive labour within all three welfare systems, is contrasted with the masculine, productionist tradition. This new understanding can form the basis of an enriched theory of human need, integrating biological and social, which offers a restatement of the goals of collective welfare.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

I Jacques, M. (1979), 'Thatcherism — the impasse broken', Marxism Today, October, pp.6-14; Hall, S. (1980), 'Thatcherism, a new stage' , Marxism Today, February, pp.26-28; Gough, I. (1980), 'Thatcherism and the welfare state', Marxism Today, July, pp.7-12.

Rose, H. (1981),'RereadingTitmuss: the sexual division of welfare ', Journal ofsocial Policy, 10, pp.477-501; Hartman, H. (1981),'The family as locus of gender, class and political struggle', Signs, Spring.

See for example, the National Front pamphlet, How to Combat Red Teachers, (1979); also Billig, M. (1978), Fascists, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

O'Connor, J. (1973), The Fiscal Crisis of the State, St. James Press.

Gough, I. (1979), The Political Economy of Welfare, Macmillan.

Macpherson, C.B. (1962), The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism, Oxford University Press.

Ryan, A. (1974), 'Social Darwinism and English thought', in The Limits of Human Nature, Benthall, J. (ed).

Wilson, E.O. (1975), Sociobiology: The New Synthesis , Harvard University Press.

Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene, Oxford University Press.

10.

Engels, F. (1875), Letters to Lavrov, 12-17 November.

11.

Wilson, E.O. (1979), On Human Nature, Harvard University Press.

12.

Herrnstein, R. (1973), I.Q.in the Meritocracy , Atlantic & Little, Brown & Company, p.221.

13.

Lewontin, R.C. (1977), 'Biological determinism as a social weapon', in Biology as a Social Weapon, Science for the People , Burgess, pp.6-20.

14.

Maynard Smith, J. and Price, G.R. (1973), 'The logic of animal conflict', Nature, 246, pp.15-18.

15.

Hirschleider, J. (1977), 'Economics from a biological viewpoint', J. Law Econ. 20 (1), pp.1-52.

16.

Goldberg, S. (1975), The Inevitability of Patriarchy , Temple Smith.

17.

Verrall, R. (1980), New Nation, 1, Summer.

18.

Brunn, J. ( 1978), La Nouvelle Droite, Oswald .

19.

Barker, M. (1981), The New Racism, Junction Books .

20.

Land, H. (1980), 'The family wage', Feminist Review , 6, pp.55-78.

21.

Jacobs, S. (1981), 'The sale of council houses: does it matter?', Critical Social Policy, 1, 2, pp.35-53.

22.

Rose, H. (1973), 'Up against the welfare state: the Claimant Unions' , Socialist Register, pp.179-204, eds Miliband, R and Saville, J. Merlin Press.

23.

Rose, H. ( 1978), 'In practice supported, in theory denied: an account of an invisible social movement', International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Winter, pp.521-537.

24.

See Mollie in London and Edinburgh Weekend Return Group (1980), In and Against the State.

25.

Taylor-Gooby, P. (1981), 'The empiricist tradition in social administration', Critical Social Policy, 1, 2, pp.6-21.

26.

Heller, A. (1977), The Theory of Need in Marx, Allison & Busby.

27.

ibid. pp.94-95.

Moving Right Out of Welfare - and the Way Back

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References