Commodification and care: An exploration of workforces’ experiences of care in private and public childcare systems from a feminist political theory of care perspective
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2022
Commodification and care: An exploration of workforces’ experiences of care in private and public childcare systems from a feminist political theory of care perspective
Drawing on feminist care ethics and political theory (Engster and Hamington, 2015; Held, 2006; Noddings, 2015; Tronto, 2013), this paper examines how educators working in private (Ontario) and public (Denmark) childcare systems think about and practice care. Through interviews with pedagogues (Denmark) and early childhood educators (Ontario), linkages between the public/private positioning of care and the care experiences of educators are explored. The findings reveal differences in how educators think about and practice care in public and private systems. At the same time, notable similarities emerged in how educators resisted neoliberal system requirements. The findings illustrate the complexities of connecting good care practices to the systemic level without diminishing the importance of individual human agency in experiencing/practicing good care in Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC). Findings suggest that good care and commodification are both theoretically and practically at odds with each other, though neither absolutely precludes the other. Implications for policy makers, particularly relevant in the contemporary COVID context, are discussed.
BarnesM (2012) Care in Everyday Life: An Ethic of Care in Practice. Bristol: Bristol University Press.
3.
BezansonKLuxtonM (2006) Introduction: Social reproduction and feminist political economy. In: BezansonKLuxtonM (eds) Social Reproduction Feminist Political Economy Challenges Neo-Liberalism.. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, pp. 3–10.
4.
BraedleySLuxtonM (2010) Neoliberalism and Everyday Life. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
ConradiE (2019) Theorising care: Attentive interaction or distributive justice. International Journal of Care and Caring. DOI:10.1332/239788219X15633663863542
8.
EngsterDHamingtonM (eds) (2015) Care Ethics and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9.
FischerMTrontoJ (1990) Toward a feminist theory of caring. In: AbelEKNelsonM (eds) Circiles of Care. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, pp. 36–54.
HeldV (2006) The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political and Global. New York: Oxford University Press.
15.
LangfordRPrenticeSAlbanesePSummersBMessina-GoertzenBRichardsonB (2013) Professionalization as an advocacy strategy: A content analysis of Canadian child care social movement organizations’ 2008 discursive resources. Early Years33(3): 302–317. DOI: 10.1080/09575146.2013.789489
16.
LangfordRRichardsonB (2020) Ethics of care in practice: An observational study of interactions and power relations between children and educators in urban Ontario early childhood settings. Journal for Childhood Studies45(1): 33–47. DOI: 10.18357/jcs00019398
17.
LangfordRBezansonKAlbanesePPrenticeSPowellABanksM (2020) Caring about care. Available at: https://careinece.ca
18.
LaslettBBrennerJ (1989) Gender and social reproduction: Historical perspectives. Annual Review of Sociology15: 381–404.
19.
LuxtonM (2006) Feminist political economy in Canada and the politics of social reproduction. In: LuxtonMBezansonK (eds) Social Reproduction: Feminist Political Economy Challenges Neo-Liberalism. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press, pp. 11–44.
MossP (2013) The relationship between early childhood and compulsory education: A properly political question. In: MossP (ed.) Early Childhood Education and Compulsory Education: Reconceptualizing the Relationship. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–49.
23.
NoddingsN (2015) Care ethics and ’caring’ organizations. In: EngsterDHamingtonM (eds) Care Ethics and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 72–84.
PrenticeS (2009) High Stakes the “investable” child and the economic reframing of childcare. Journal of Women in Culture and Society34(3): 687–710. DOI: 10.1086/593711
27.
RichardsonB (2017) Taking stock of childcare in Canada. In: LangfordRPrenticeSAlbaneseP (eds) Caring for Children: Social Movements and Public Policy in Canada. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press, pp. 119–140.
28.
RichardsonBLangfordR (2020) Citizen engagement in child care policy: Examining child care policy problematisations in Canadian newspaper articles from 2008 to 2015. In: GarvisSPhillipsonS (eds) Policification of Early Childhood Education and Care: Early Childhood Education in the 21st Century. Volume III. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 23–36.
29.
SevenhuijsenS (1998) Citizenship and the Ethics of Care: Feminist Considerations on Justice, Morality and Politics. Abington: Routledge.
30.
SevenhuijsenS (2003) The place of care: The relevance of the feminist ethic of care for social policy. Feminist Theory42(2): 179–197. DOI:10.1177/14647001030042006
SloteM (2015) Care ethics and liberalism. In: EngsterDHamingtonM (eds) Care Ethics and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 37–50.
33.
TrontoJ (2003) Times place. Feminst Theory4(2): 119–138.
34.
TrontoJ (2013) Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality, and Justice. New York: New York University Press.
35.
TrontoJ (2016) Can caring democracy be a political concept for transformation?Arguments58(6): 839–848.
36.
Waag VilladsenJHviidP (2017) The history of children’s engagements in Danish child care. In: RingsmoseCKragh-MüllerG (eds) Nordic Social Pedagogical Appraoch to Early Years. Volume 15. London: Springer.
