A critical insight into practitioners’ lived experience of payment by results in the alcohol and drug treatment sector

Abstract

Since former Chancellor George Osborne described reducing public spending as ‘the great national challenge of our generation’ (Her Majesty’s Treasury, 2010: 12) the UK Government have demonstrated a profound interest in Payment by Results (PbR) as a mechanism to improve service quality, value for money and innovation (Audit Commission, 2012). Although PbR is not a new initiative, it has been rebranded and sold as a vehicle that can steer ongoing strategies for reform, particularly in the field of criminal justice and drug/alcohol treatment (Her Majesty’s Government, 2010; Ministry of Justice 2013). Despite such assertions, the initiative has become synonymous with budget cuts (Community Links, 2015), the privatisation of public services (Policy Exchange, 2013) and controversy. Drawing upon the findings of a focus group with staff who work in a Therapeutic Community, this article highlights the lived experience of practitioners as PbR takes hold of the alcohol and drug treatment sector. The findings suggest that outcome-orientated incentives, such as PbR, hold the potential to transform welfare-orientated sectors into a financial, market-focused milieu.

Keywords

outcome-based commissioning Payment by Results Therapeutic Community

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Annison

Burke

Senior

(2014) Transforming rehabilitation: Another example of English ‘exceptionalism’ or a blueprint for the rest of Europe? European Journal of Probation 6: 6–23.

Audit Commission (2012) Local Payment by Results. London: Audit Commission.

Best

Lubman

(2012) The Recovery Paradigm: A model of hope and change for alcohol and drug addiction. Australian Family Physician 41(8): 593–597.

Best

Albertson

Irving

et al (2015) The UK Life in Recovery Survey 2015: The first national UK survey of addiction recovery experiences. Project Report. Sheffield, Helena Kennedy Centre for International Justice, Sheffield Hallam University. Available at: http://shura.shu.ac.uk/12200/ (accessed 19 July 2016).

Borkman

Kaskutas

Room

et al . (1998) An historical and developmental analysis of social model programs. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 27: 123–134.

Chandler

Munday

(2016) A Dictionary of Media and Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Community Links (2015) The Troubled Families Programme: The Perfect Social Policy? Centre for Better Outcomes. London: Collaborate at London South Bank University.

DeLeon

(2000) The Therapeutic Community. Theory, Model and Method. New York: Springer.

Department for International Development (2014) Payment by Results strategy: Sharpening incentives to perform. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/dfids-strategy-for-payment-by-results-sharpening-incentives-to-perform/payment-by-results-strategy-sharpening-incentives-to-perform (accessed 19 July 2016).

10.

Department of Health (2012) Equality Analysis: Payment by Results Pilot Programme for Drug and Alcohol Recovery. Available at: www.gpcwm.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/PAYMENT%20BY%RESULTS%20(PBR)Payment_By_Results_Pilot_Programme_for_Drug_&_Alcohol_Recovery_Equality_Analysis_Aug_2012.pdf (accessed 21 July 2013).

11.

Department of Health (2013) Improving Outcomes and Supporting Transparency. Part 1: A Public Health Outcomes Framework for England 2013–2016. Available at: http://www.rcpsych.ac.uk/pdf/The%20Public%20Health%20Outcomes%20Framework.pdf (accessed 4 December 2013).

12.

DrugScope (2013) The Public Health Reforms. What They Mean For Drug and Alcohol Services. Available at: http://www.drugscope.org.uk/Resources/Drugscope/Documents/PDF/Policy/PublicHealthReform.pdf (accessed 4 December 2013).

13.

Flynn

Joe

Broome

Simpson

(2003) Looking back on cocaine dependence: Reasons for recovery. American Journal on Addictions 12: 398–411.

14.

Gibbs

(1997) Focus groups. Social Research Update (19). Available at: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU19.html (accessed 19 July 2016).

15.

Gosling

(2015) An invitation to change? An ethnographic study of a residential Therapeutic Community for substance use. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Liverpool John Moores University.

16.

Gosling

(2016) ‘All this is about is money and making sure that heads are on beds’: Perceptions of Payment by Results in a Therapeutic Community. Probation Journal. The Journal of Community and Criminal Justice 63(2): 144–152. Available at: http://prb.sagepub.com/content/63/2/144?etoc (accessed 14 February 2017).

17.

Her Majesty’s Government. (2010) Reducing Demand, Restricting Supply, Building Recovery: Supporting people to live a drug free life. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/98026/drug-strategy-2010.pdf (accessed 28 November 2013).

18.

Her Majesty’s Treasury (2010) Spending review. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/203826/Spending_review_2010.pdf (accessed 19 July 2016).

19.

Hunter

Breidenbach-Roe

(2013) Payment by Results Contracts: A legal analysis of terms and processes. London: BWB/NCVO.

20.

Lagarde

Wright

Nossiter

et al . (2013) Challenges of Payment for Performance in Health Care and Other Public Services – design, implementation and evaluation. London: Policy Research Unit in Policy Innovation Research.

21.

McLellan

Kemp

Brooks

et al . (2008) Improving public addiction treatment through performance contracting: The Delaware experiment. Health Policy 87: 296–308.

22.

McNeil

Hunter

(2015) Breaking Boundaries: Towards a Troubled Lives’ Programme for people facing multiple and complex needs. London: Institute for Public Policy Research.

23.

McGrain

(2010) An Examination of Therapeutic Engagement: An examination of therapeutic engagement in a prison-based drug treatment therapeutic community. Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing.

24.

McLellan

(2010) What is recovery? Revisiting the Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel definition. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 38(2): 200–201.

25.

Meier

Barrowclough

Donmall

(2005) The role of the therapeutic alliance in the treatment of substance misuse: A critical review of the literature. Addiction 100(3): 304–316.

26.

Ministry of Justice (2013) Transforming Rehabilitation: A strategy for reform. Available at: https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/transforming-rehabilitation/results/transforming-rehabilitation-response.pdf (accessed 28 December 2015).

27.

Morgan

(1988) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

28.

Mulgan

Reeder

Aylott

et al . (2010) Social Impact Investment: The challenge and opportunity of social impact bonds. London: The Young Foundation.

29.

National Audit Office (2015) Outcome-based Payment Schemes: Government’s use of payment by results. Available at: https://www.nao.org.uk/press-releases/outcome-based-payment-schemes-governments-use-of-payment-by-results-2/ (accessed 31 July 2015).

30.

National Audit Office (2016) Assessing Value for Money. Available at: https://www.nao.org.uk/successful-commissioning/general-principles/value-for-money/assessing-value-for-money/ (accessed 20 July 2016).

31.

National Council for Voluntary Organisations (2013) Payment by Results (Public Services). Available at: http://www.ncvo-vol.org.uk/commissioning/paymentbyresults (accessed 4 July 2013).

32.

Policy Exchange (2013) Expanding Payment-by-Results: Strategic choices and recommendations. London: Policy Exchange.

33.

Powell

Single

Lloyd

(1996) Focus groups in mental health research: enhancing the validity of user and provider questionnaires. International Journal of Social Psychology 42(3): 193–206.

34.

Prison Reform Trust (2005) Private Punishment: Who profits? Available at: http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/portals/0/documents/private%20punishment%20who%20profits.pdf (accessed 19 July 2016).

35.

Rabiee

(2004) Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 63: 655–660.

36.

Ryan

Ramon

Greacen

(2012) Introduction. In: Ryan

Ramon

Greacen

(eds.) Empowerment, Lifelong Learning and Recovery in Mental Health: Towards a new paradigm. Basingstoke: MacMillan, 1–12.

37.

Scott

Gosling

(2015) Before prison, instead of prison, better than prison: Therapeutic Communities as an abolitionist real utopia. International Journal of Crime, Justice and Social Democracy 5(1): 52–66.

38.

Strauss

Corbin

(1990) Basics of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.

39.

The Betty Ford Institute Consensus Panel (2007) What is recovery? A working definition from The Betty Ford Institute. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 33: 221–228.

40.

The Scottish Government (2008) The Road to Recovery: A new approach for tackling Scotland’s drug problem. Available at: http://www.gov.scot/Resource/Doc/224480/0060586.pdf (accessed 20 July 2016).

41.

Webster

(2015) Payment by Results: Lessons from the literature. Available at: http://russellwebster.com/documents/Lessons%20from%20the%20Payment%20by%20Results%20literature%20Russell%20Webster%202016.pdf (accessed 20 July 2016).

42.

White

(2004) Transformational change and addiction recovery. Counselor 5(4): 30–32.

43.

Whitfield

(2015) Alternatives to Private Finance of the Welfare State: The global analysis of social impact bonds, pay-for-success and development impact bond projects. Adelaide: Australian Workplace Innovation and Social Research Centre and European Services Strategy Unit.