In July 2012 the Conservative–Liberal Democrat Coalition government introduced a new set of family migration rules. These rules set a sharp increase in the minimum income threshold for people sponsoring partners and children to join them in the UK. Consequently, there has been a significant reduction in the number of visas granted through the family migration route. This article explores the themes of class in connection to transnational relationships and citizenship in the formulation of the new family migration rules, in the justifications that have been made for the rules and in the impact of the rules on applicants. It is argued that in the context of international migration and transnational relationships, class-based moralism and regulation has been entwined with exclusionary discourses on ethnicity, national belonging and citizenship and has been extended beyond the nation-state border towards the governing of particular kinds of international family.
Benarieh RufferG (2011) ‘Pushed beyond Recognition? The Liberality of Family Reunification Policies in the EU’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies37(6): 935–951.
5.
BenhabibS (2004) The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents and Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6.
BilligM (1995) Banal Nationalism. London: SAGE.
7.
BlackstockC (2002) ‘Blunkett in Clash over Marriages’, The Guardian, 8February.
8.
BoccagniP (2014) ‘Caring about Migrant Workers? From Private Obligations to Transnational Social Welfare’, Critical Social Policy34(2): 221–240.
ChantlerKGangoliGHesterM (2009) ‘Forced Marriage in the UK: Religious, Cultural, Economic or State Violence?’, Critical Social Policy29(4): 587–612.
12.
ColdwellW (2013) ‘Families Being Torn Apart by Migration Rules that Set an Income Threshold for Spouse’s Visa Application’, The Independent, 8September.
13.
D’AoustA-M (2013) ‘In the Name of Love: Marriage Migration, Governmentality, and Technologies of Love’, International Journal of Political Sociology7(3): 258–274.
SalesR (2002) ‘The Deserving and the Undeserving? Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Welfare in Britain’, Critical Social Policy22(3): 456–478.
39.
ShamsieK (2014) ‘Kamila Shamsie on Applying for British Citizenship: I Never Felt Safe’, The Guardian, 4March.
40.
SirriyehA (2013a) ‘Burying Asylum under the Foundations of Home’, pp. 202–222 in KapoorNKalraVRhodesJ (eds) The State of Race. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
SirriyehA (2014) ‘Sanctuary or Sanctions: Children, Social Worth and Social Control in the UK Asylum Process’, pp. 71–86 in HarrisonMSandersT (eds) Social Policies and Social Control: New Perspectives on the ‘Not-So-Big Society’. Bristol: Policy Press.
43.
SkeggsB (1997) Formations of Class and Gender. London: SAGE.
44.
SpencerS (2011) The Migration Debate. Bristol: Policy Press.
45.
TonkensEGrootegoedEDuyvendakJW (2013) ‘Introduction: Welfare State Reform, Recognition and Emotional Labour’, Social Policy and Society12(3):407–413.
46.
TylerI (2013) Revolting Subjects: Social Abjection and Resistance in Neoliberal Britain. London: Zed Books.
VerhoevenITonkensE (2013) ‘Talking Active Citizenship: Framing Welfare State Reform in England and the Netherlands’, Social Policy and Society12(3): 415–426.
WigganJ (2012) ‘Telling Stories of 21st Century Welfare: The UK Coalition Government and the Neo-liberal Discourse of Worklessness and Dependency’, Critical Social Policy32(3): 383–405.
51.
WilliamsF (1989) Social Policy: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
52.
WilliamsF (2011) ‘Towards a Transnational Analysis of the Political Economy of Care’, pp. 21–38 in MahonRRobinsonF (eds) Feminist Ethics and Social Policy: Towards a New Global Political Economy of Care. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
53.
WilsonA (2007) ‘The Forced Marriage Debate and the British State’, Race and Class49(1): 25–29.
54.
WintourP (2013) ‘EU NationalsMaybe Banned from Benefits in UK under New Proposals’, The Guardian, 25March.
55.
WrayH (2011) Regulating Marriage Migration into the UK: A Stranger in the Home. Farnham: Ashgate.
